Kelly, it would be great if you could follow up on these additional checks
in Xerces. Is there anyone willing to try out XML Authority and/or XML Spy
on the same (modified) test file?
Eve
At 01:23 PM 11/6/01 -0800, Dave Carlson wrote:
>Kelly,
>I'd like to add a few other variations to the test example that may be
>more likely to cause conformance problems:
>
>1) elementFormDefault = unqualified
>
>2) global and local elements of the same name (i.e. add a global
>element called "loc" in your example).
>
>Dave
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Schwarzhoff, Kelly" <>
>To: <>
>Sent: Tuesday, November 06, 2001 11:35 AM
>Subject: [ubl-ndrsc] Results of local elements
>
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > One of the action items for UBL was to review support of local
>elements in
> > tools. I volunteered to test Xerces (I tested version 1.4.3
>specifically),
> > and it passed. The following sample tests it, note it tests same
>local name
> > used multiple places with different types:
> >
> > <<a.xml>> <<a.xsd>>
> > Cheers,
> >
> > Kelly
> >
>
>
>----------------------------------------------------------------
>To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription
>manager: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl>
--
Eve Maler +1 781 442 3190
Sun Microsystems XML Technology Center eve.maler @ sun.com
