All of this work is done by "just us chickens", so I don't want to stand on
ceremony too much. I agree that it's a good idea to ensure that the
context work get general agreement by the full NDR group, but I would have
assumed that to be a good idea anyway, even for the stuff that's
uncontroversially 100% in the CMSC bailiwick anyway.
Let's definitely consider the December 19 meeting a joint SC meeting, but
we've only got 60 minutes, so let's be careful how we spend it.
Eve
At 10:14 AM 12/6/01 -0800, Gregory, Arofan wrote:
>Matt:
>
>I'm a little concerned that we get concensus from the design team on this,
>since it drives so many other decisions about modularity, which features
>of schema are to be used, namespaces & versioning, etc. I think we have
>too many teams working on the same thing at the same time to be splitting
>work up in an uncoordinated fashion, so we need to be really careful to
>stay aligned, even with the overlap in membership. Perhaps after the
>discussion next week - assuming we get agreement within the design team -
>we could then pass it off, but I do think we want to be careful about this.
--
Eve Maler
+1 781 442 3190
Sun Microsystems XML Technology Center
eve.maler @ sun.com
