MHonArc v2.5.0b2 -->
ubl-ndrsc message
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]
Subject: RE: [ubl-ndrsc] Re: [ubl-lcsc] CCT, RT, DT Files with fixed Major:Minor numbering
From: "Stuhec, Gunther" <>
To: "'Tim McGrath'" <>
Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2003 14:02:05 +0200
Title: Message
Hello
Tim,
I'm
answering your other questions, now:
a. Does this code set implementation conform to that used for other
code sets in the Library? for example, these should be 'standard' code
sets using the mechanisms of our code catalogue.
<GS>This is not agreed with the NDRSC, now. And the file name is a
part of the NDRSC</GS>
b. Where we re-use these codes in the Library BIEs, do they/can they
share a common source? for example, will your 'currencyID' reference our
'UBL-CodeList-CurrencyCode-Use-1.0-???????.xsd'?
<GS>This is not agreed with the NDRSC, now. And the file name is a
part of the NDRSC</GS>
Of course, none of this is an NDR issue - although we did spend
time talking about this on the Joint NDR/LC call 3 weeks ago and no-one at NDR
mentioned you were planning to do this.
<GS>I guess, this is a NDRSC
issue</GS>
Bear in mind, the code working group
and LC have spent several weeks working on a code set implementation mechanism
and don't want to inherit any orphans at this late stage.
<GS>I do not know the latest decisions of the code working group.
Does this decisions impacts the xml schema? I mean the xml schema
definitions and declarations and not the part within
annotation.</GS>
Also, we shall be building the
final 1.0 schemas following the Friday teleconference. We need to receive
the final CCT, RT and DT schemas before then if we are to use them for UBL
1.0
<GS>I hope the sent version is stable,
now!!!</GS>
Kind
regards,
Gunther
Follow-Ups:
Re: [ubl-ndrsc] Re: [ubl-lcsc] CCT, RT, DT Files with fixed Major:Minor numbering
From: Tim McGrath <>
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]
