Re: [ubl-ndrsc] Re: [ubl-lcsc] CCT, RT, DT Files with fixed Major:Minor numbering

MHonArc v2.5.0b2 -->

















ubl-ndrsc message






[Date Prev]
 | [Thread Prev]
 | [Thread Next]
 | [Date Next]

--

[Date Index]
 | [Thread Index]
 | [List Home]








Subject: Re: [ubl-ndrsc] Re: [ubl-lcsc] CCT, RT, DT Files with fixed Major:Minor numbering




From: Tim McGrath <>
To: "Stuhec, Gunther" <>
Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2003 22:38:38 +0800










i am less concerned about file names and more concerned with architecture.
 apart from the file naming, does it fit with the way we are doing other
code lists?


Stuhec, Gunther wrote:

 
 
  
  
   
  
 
  Hello  Tim,
 
   
 
  I'm  answering your other questions, now:
  
  

a. Does this code set implementation conform to that used for other  code
sets in the Library?  for example, these should be 'standard' code  sets
using the mechanisms of our code catalogue.   
 
   
 
  <GS>This is not agreed with the NDRSC, now.
And the file name is a  part of the NDRSC</GS> 
   
  

b. Where we re-use these codes in the Library BIEs, do they/can they  share
a common source?  for example, will your 'currencyID' reference our  'UBL-CodeList-CurrencyCode-Use-1.0-???????.xsd'? 
 
   
   
  <GS>This is not agreed with the NDRSC, now.
And the file name is a  part of the NDRSC</GS> 
   
  


Of course, none of this is an NDR issue - although we did spend  time talking
about this on the Joint NDR/LC call 3 weeks ago and no-one at NDR  mentioned
you were planning to do this.   
 
   
 
  <GS>I guess, this is a NDRSC  issue</GS> 


Bear in mind, the code working group  and LC have spent several weeks working
on a code set implementation mechanism  and don't want to inherit any orphans
at this late stage. 
 
   
 
  <GS>I do not know the latest decisions of
the code working group.  Does this decisions impacts the xml schema? I mean
the xml schema  definitions and declarations and not the part within  annotation.</GS> 


Also, we shall be building the  final 1.0 schemas following the Friday teleconference.
 We need to receive  the final CCT, RT and DT schemas before then if we are
to use them for UBL  1.0 
 
   
 
  <GS>I hope the sent version is stable,  now!!!</GS>
 
   
 
  Kind  regards,
 
   
 
      Gunther 

  


-- 
regards
tim mcgrath
phone: +618 93352228  
postal: po box 1289   fremantle    western australia 6160