Re: [ubl-payfin] updated payment means working draft doc

Hi Levine


  Well done!! I ve made some minor suggestions and comments (see attached), mainly editorial (use of RFC keywords and avoiding hanging paragraphs).


  The only thing I stumbled upon (and sorry for not picking up on this before) is the section on
  payment via credit or debit card  (2.3.3). In the opening text you say that  the use of CardAccount under PaymentMandate  is not currently supported and  will be supported in future versions , and then the example shows how this would
  hypothetically work in future versions of UBL. However, the committee note references UBL 2.2, and how something might be used or included in future versions is speculation at this point. But why do you want to have the CardAccount ASBIE inside a PaymentMandate
  in the first place? Couldn t it be directly inside the PaymentMeans as it is in UBL 2.2?


  Could you update the date (frontpage, footer and revision history) to be the date where we will vote on the public review? So if we have it for this week then the date of the document would be Wednesday June 12.


  /Kenneth
From:
<> on behalf of Levine Naidoo <>
Date:  Thursday, June 6, 2019 at 7:51 PM
To:  "" <>
Subject:  [ubl-payfin] updated payment means working draft doc



Hi All

  kindly find attached

  regards
  Levine
  (See attached file: UBL-Payment-v1.0-wd03.docx)

Attachment:
UBL-Payment-v1.0-wd03 - KB comments.docx
Description:  UBL-Payment-v1.0-wd03 - KB comments.docx