Re: [uiml] Final version of the UIML 4.0 specification - reformatted to match the OASIS template.

From
Robbie Schaefer <>
Date
2007-10-01T13:01:09+00:00
ID
006201c8042b$270939c0$
Thread
Re: [uiml] Final version of the UIML 4.0 specification - reformatted to match the OASIS template.
Hi all,

 

Attached is a new version with the inconsistencies 
between the DTD and the element introductions removed.

I did not turn on track-changes, so here is a list 
of changes I applied:

 

- the alias element changed according to the 
DTD

- the logic element had some spelling mistakes in 
its attributes (now fixed)

- the d-component element changed according to the 
DTD and spelling mistakes in attributes fixed

- the d-param element changed according to the 
DTD

- the script element changed according to the 
DTD

- added ATTLIST to the repeat element in 
DTD

- the iterator element changed according to the 
DTD

- the param element changed according to the 
DTD

- the variable element changed according 
to the DTD

- the peers element changed according to the 
DTD

- added ATTLIST to the d-template-param element in 
DTD

- the template-param element changed according to 
the DTD

 

Best Regards,

Robbie.

--
   _/ Dr. Robbie 
Schaefer        _/ Phone: +49 5251 
60-6107  _/
  _/ Visual Interactive Systems _/ Fax: +49 5251 
60-6065    _/
 _/ C-LAB Fuerstenallee 
11     
_/                          
_/
_/ D-33102 Paderborn          
_/ URL: http://www.c-lab.de _/

  
----- Original Message ----- 

  
From: 
  James Helms 
  

  
To:  

  
Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2007 8:32 
  PM

  
Subject: [uiml] Final version of the UIML 
  4.0 specification - reformatted to match the OASIS template.

  

  
Hello 
  all,

  
 

  
Thanks to everyone 
  who took a look at the UIML 4.0 specification and provided feedback!  
  Attached is the latest version that addresses everyone's comments and adheres 
  to the current OASIS Specification template.  

  
 

  
To answer Kris's 
  question, I have done an informal appraisal of the specification features and 
  have concluded that all of the additions to the language have (to the best of 
  my knowledge) been implemented somewhere (either in Harmonia's tools, 
  uiml.net, DSL,...).   Perhaps a more formal examination could be 
  performed during the public review.

  
 

  
At this point I 
  would like to have this version of the specification approved by the committee 
  as a Committee Draft.  To this end, what is your availability over the 
  next couple of weeks?  I would like to meet via phone to hold the vote 
  and then submit it for Public Review!

  
 

  
Regards,

  
James Helms

Director of 
  Research and Development
Harmonia, Inc. 
P.O. Box 11282
Blacksburg, 
  VA 24062

Office: (540) 951-5900 x 205
Cell: (540) 
  558-9722

  
 

uiml-core-4.0-draft_RS011007.doc