On Tue, 24 Jul 2018 11:27:33 -0700
"Samudrala, Sridhar" <> wrote:
> On 7/24/2018 5:43 AM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> > I still think we need a more detailed description of how this is
> > supposed to work elsewhere (i.e., outside of the normative section).
> > But we can probably merge an updated version of this patch to get at
> > least the feature bit reserved and documented. Thoughts?
>
> Sure. I can submit a v3 version with the minor changes you suggested.
> The detailed description of the failover mechanism can be added once qemu
> patch to handle the standby feature bit is submitted and reviewed.
> I am assuming someone in RH is looking into the qemu enablement patch.
Sounds reasonable to me.
Michael, what do you think?