On Wed, 12 Jul 2017 10:35:20 +0100
Stefan Hajnoczi <> wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 01:51:29PM +0200, Cornelia Huck wrote:
>
> receiveq(n) is at position 2(n-1)+1. Same error for transmitq(n)
>
> and controlq.
> >
>
> VIRTIO-161
> >
>
> Signed-off-by: Cornelia Huck <>
> > ---
>
> content.tex | 6 +++---
>
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
>
> diff --git a/content.tex b/content.tex
>
> index d8bde3a..2319729 100644
> > --- a/content.tex
> > +++ b/content.tex
> > @@ -3064,9 +3064,9 @@ features.
> > \item[0] receiveq1
> > \item[1] transmitq1
> > \item[\ldots]
> > -\item[2N] receiveqN
> > -\item[2N+1] transmitqN
> > -\item[2N+2] controlq
> > +\item[2(N-1)] receiveqN
> > +\item[2(N-1)+1] transmitqN
> > +\item[2(N-1)+2] controlq
>
> There is still only one controlq overall. Therefore I suggest:
>
>
\item[2N] controlq
>
> This seems clearer to me since "\item[2(N-1)+2] controlq" makes it look
> like the controlq is repeated along with rx and tx queues.
Indeed, that is easier to parse. Will update.
