On Mon, Feb 08, 2021 at 05:15:55PM +0100, Halil Pasic wrote:
> On Mon, 8 Feb 2021 07:15:57 -0500 > "Michael S. Tsirkin" <> wrote: > >
> we are adding new device types all the time. >
> no point in trying to list them all in the charter. > > >
> Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <> >
> Reviewed-by: Cornelia Huck <> > > --- >
> charter.html
17 +
----------------
>
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 16 deletions(-) > > >
> diff --git a/charter.html b/charter.html >
> index 38cad98..82fb981 100644 > > --- a/charter.html > > +++ b/charter.html > > @@ -80,22 +80,7 @@ >
>
Specification of device-specific configuration. > >
<ol class="vanilla-lower-alpha"> > >
<li> > > -
For network devices. > > -
</li> > > -
<li> > > -
For block storage devices. > > -
</li> > > -
<li> > > -
For entropy devices. > > -
</li> > > -
<li> > > -
For console devices. > > -
</li> > > -
<li> > > -
For memory ballooning devices. > > -
</li> > > -
<li> > > -
For SCSI endpoint devices. > > +
Normative requirements for specified device types. > >
</li> >
> Does it make sense to keep the list with only a single element? > > >
<li> >
>
Non-normative advice for designing new device types. >
> I believe the the rest of the items starting with the one immediately
> above should be moved up one level higher. These don't seem to be sub
> deliverables of 'device-specific configuration' but top level
> deliverables... Well if you look at the spec they are all under section 5 Device Types. The only exception is Appendix B. Creating New Device Types. I will move that one out.
> Regards,
> Halil