Mark, to answer your question/comment:
The corrupted URL was supposed to be removed. The element in the SOAP
example should be:
<soap:Header =
mustUnderstand="1">
Whether you want to add a type that is a string for the
CompletionStatus is fine. Or the text needs to change to lower case the
CompletionStatus to completion-status or completion status string
Greg Pavlik wrote:
Is it
correct to say that Eric holds the change token against Mark's latest?
After Eric's changes come in today, how do we proceed to a TC release?
Greg
Greg Pavlik wrote:
If the activity is the execution, then no, we
don't manage it. On the other hand, what is this context thingy before
we start to do any operations?
Newcomer, Eric wrote:
I had started making a few changes also.
Perhaps the best thing for me to do is start over with this version.
Everything I spotted was editorial except for one thing, which was a
statement that we were managing activities. I have seen this also in
Microsoft material. The difficulty is that we are calling activity an
abstract notion for which we are managing context. I do not think we
create or manage the activity itself, do we?
I'll get the rest input as soon as I can.
-----Original Message-----
From: Mark Little [mailto:]
Sent: Monday, June 14, 2004 7:27 AM
To: Greg Pavlik; ws-caf-editors
Subject: Re: [ws-caf-editors] Latest (final?) WS-Context
Comments in line. I accepted all of the changes and then made some
more.
Mark.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Greg Pavlik" <>
To: "ws-caf-editors" <>
Sent: Friday, June 11, 2004 10:36 PM
Subject: [ws-caf-editors] Latest (final?) WS-Context
Gentlemen,
This is the latest revision for the proposed committee draft. I urge
you
to read it carefully with the change bars turned off; please be
especially diligent in looking for errors.
Mark, WSDL+Schema on the way for packaging things up for the TC to
review.
We're getting close. Thanks to everyone for their hard work.
Greg
