Given what was decided yesterday, it seems like
issue 16 should be closed as it is covered by issue 45.
Mark.
----- Original Message -----
From:
Mark
Little
To:
Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2004 4:02
PM
Subject: [ws-caf] next set of
issues
Concentrating on general and WS-Context issues
for now, I want to propose we try to tidy up the following
issues:
12
nor
P2
All
NEW
clarify reply-to address in schema (and possibly the text)
13
maj
P2
All
NEW
UserActivityServicePortType the "completionStatus" operat...
14
nor
P2
All
NEW
StatusType is a restriction but is extended in WS-TXM. Is...
15
cri
P2
All
NEW
CompleteWithStatus has the wrong type
16
nor
P2
All
NEW
None of the WS-CAF schemas are WSI BP compliant.
17
nor
P2
All
NEW
wsc4c is referenced in parts of WS-CF schema. Is it elsew...
18
maj
P2
All
NEW
Incorrect WSDL import statement.
19
cri
P2
All
NEW
No "part" attribute.
20
nor
P2
All
NEW
Missing portType operations
In line with something Alastair (I think)
mentioned yesterday about possible sharing implications of context, this came
up at the face-to-face and is
46
nor
P2
All
NEW
Context sharing
So maybe we want to discuss it too, though I
suspect it won't be resolved quickly.
Mark.
