All,
My apologies for missing the call yesterday due to the holiday.
Did the group agree to Mark's proposed resolution for issue 7 without
modification? That is, are we going with "Respondant"? Agreement on
this issue implies the group is not paying attention because
"respondant" is not in the dictionaries I have checked, even as a
British spelling. "Respondent" seems to be the correct word though its
meaning involves a legal nuance (being a defendant) irrelevant to our usage.
thanx,
doug
On 20-Jan-04 07:01, Guy Pardon wrote:
> Below are the meetings I recorded. Due to the interference on the line I
> am not sure if I got everything right.
> Please send your comments to me if you have any.
>
> Guy
...
> Next item: issues resolution
> Martin: The only way to make progress is by going over issues and
> resolve them before moving on.
> Did everyone get a chance to read the issues? Silence. Any motions?
> Remark: In most cases they appear typos or editorial fixes.
>
> Motion to adopt them (issues 1-11) by Greg. Anybody seconding? Yes: Simeon.
> Any discussions? No. Objections? No. Motion approved.
>
> Simeon still has to do an update.
...
