Please go ahead and include the text. Please also update
the URLs in the text to include "http://" which is currently missing (as pointed
out by Pete on the list).
BTW, this issue was included in the group of editorial
issues that we agreed to include in the next CD4 rev on yesterday's
call. So technically, this was discussed!
- Sanjay
From: Doug Davis [mailto:]
Sent: Friday, Aug 11, 2006 9:42 AM
To: Patil,
Sanjay
Cc:
Subject: Re: [ws-rx]
FW: [Fwd: WS-RX Public Review]
As I'm updating the spec should I
include this? We didn't talk about it on the call yesterday.
If I don't hear back I'll assume
'yes'.
-Doug
"Patil, Sanjay"
<>
08/09/2006 08:02 PM
To
<>
cc
Subject
[ws-rx] FW: [Fwd: WS-RX Public
Review]
In preparation for the PR, the OASIS staff has suggested the
following
update to our specifications. This is a boiler-plate, pro forma
change
and I would not expect any objections to this as such.
Nevertheless, we
could talk about this on tomorrow's call and decide
to apply this change
for the next revision (due after tomorrow's call),
which would be a PR
candidate as per our current plans.
Marc, could
you please include Mary's suggestion in your list of
new
issues.
Kudos to our editors team that the OASIS staff could not
raise any major
red flags.
-- Sanjay
-----Original
Message-----
From: Mary McRae [mailto:]
Sent:
Wednesday, Aug 09, 2006 16:19 PM
To: Patil, Sanjay;
; 'Paul Fremantle'
Subject: RE: [Fwd: WS-RX Public
Review]
Hi Patil,
It looks fine, except for the status
section. Please update the text
to match
the template - particularly
noting how to submit comments - as
shown
below:
------------
This document was last revised or
approved by the [TC name] on the
above date.
The level of approval is
also listed above. Check the current location
noted
above for possible
later revisions of this document. This document is
updated
periodically
on no particular schedule.
Technical Committee members should send
comments on this specification
to the
Technical Committee's email list.
Others should send comments to the
Technical
Committee by using the
"Send A Comment" button on the Technical
Committee's web
page at
www.oasis-open.org/committees/[specific-location].
For information on
whether any patents have been disclosed that may be
essential
to
implementing this specification, and any offers of patent
licensing
terms,
please refer to the Intellectual Property Rights
section of the
Technical
Committee web page (
www.oasis-open.org/committees/[specific-location]/
ipr.php.
The
non-normative errata page for this specification is located
at
www.oasis-open.org/committees/[specific-location].
------------
Other than that it looks good to go. The good news
is that both comment
lists
and the members announce list appear to be
functioning properly (other
than
archives) so I can actually make the
announcement once the documents are
approved and
submitted.
Regards,
Mary
> -----Original
Message-----
> From: Patil, Sanjay [mailto:]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 09, 2006 6:09 PM
> To:
; Paul Fremantle
> Subject: RE: [Fwd: WS-RX
Public Review]
>
>
> Hi Mary,
>
> The
candidate PR drafts are at
>
http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/19583/WSRM-CD4.zip.
>
This package does not yet include an HTML version and our
> editors
team is currently working on it. Meanwhile, could you
> please take a
look at the other formats (PDF, ODT) and let us
> know if they look
alright. It will be great to get your
> feedback by tomorrow (8/10)
before 1 PM Pacific, since that's
> when our TC meets and we plan to
finalize the content of PR
> drafts during this meeting. Sorry for the
short notice.
>
> -- Sanjay
>
> > -----Original
Message-----
> > From: Mary McRae
[mailto:]
> > Sent: Thursday, Aug 03, 2006
14:06 PM
> > To: 'Paul Fremantle'; Patil, Sanjay
> >
Subject: RE: [Fwd: WS-RX Public Review]
> >
> > Hi
Paul,
> >
> > Hopefully the comment lists will be
functional in the next day or
> > two; there's no need to *set up*
anything as this was done
> for all TCs
> > at the same time.
The most important thing is to make sure the
> > specification is in
the proper format - please check the
> templates at
> >
docs.oasis-open.org/templates/ and make sure that you have the
> >
appropriate cover page boilerplate text, notice, etc.
> >
>
> When you're ready to make the formal submission, note
>
that I'll need
> > the spec in three formats: editable source, HTML,
and PDF.
> >
> > That should be it, but please feel
free to send me a
> pointer to the
> > spec and I'll do a
quick check before you produce all of
> the versions
> > and
point out anything that should be changed.
> >
> >
Mary
> >
> >
> > >
> > > --------
Original Message --------
> > > Subject:
WS-RX Public Review
> > >
Date: Mon, 31
Jul 2006 23:05:45 +0100
> > > From:
Paul Fremantle <>
>
> > To:
Mary McRae <>, "Patil, Sanjay"
>
> > <>
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Mary
> > >
> >
> The WS-RX TC has now closed all substantive issues, and we are
>
> > aiming to have a vote for CD and PR on the call 8/17. We
>
would like
> > > to be ahead of the game in terms of
getting
> > ready for that.
> > >
> > > Our
issues editor is starting to prepare for capturing any raised
> >
> issues. I believe we need to setup the comments list
> using the
new
> > > comments facility. And we need to inform you.
>
> > Have I missed anything?
> > >
> > > What
else can we do to be aforehand in our preparations?
> > >
>
> > Yours,
> > > Paul
> > >
> > >
--
> > >
> > > Paul Fremantle
> > >
VP/Technology, WSO2 and OASIS WS-RX TC Co-chair
> > >
>
> > http://feeds.feedburner.com/bloglines/pzf
> > >
> > >
> > > "Oxygenating the Web
Service Platform", www.wso2.com
> > >
> > >
>
> >
> > >
> > > --
> > >
>
> > Paul Fremantle
> > > VP/Technology, WSO2 and OASIS WS-RX
TC Co-chair
> > >
> > >
http://feeds.feedburner.com/bloglines/pzf
> > >
> > >
> > > "Oxygenating the Web
Service Platform", www.wso2.com
> > >
> >
> >
