Next in thread →
Next in month →
RE: [ws-rx] FW: [Fwd: WS-RX Public Review]
Ah - I didn't notice it was part of the list. Never mind then -Doug "Marc Goodner" <> 08/11/2006 12:46 PM To Doug Davis/Raleigh/IBM@IBMUS, "Patil, Sanjay" <> cc <> Subject RE: [ws-rx] FW: [Fwd: WS-RX Public Review] This was included in the list of editorial comments we adopted as issue 158. It was tagged in the new issues for this week and the minutes as Proposed-08 WS-RX Public Review. From: Doug Davis [mailto:] Sent: Friday, August 11, 2006 9:42 AM To: Patil, Sanjay Cc: Subject: Re: [ws-rx] FW: [Fwd: WS-RX Public Review] As I'm updating the spec should I include this? We didn't talk about it on the call yesterday. If I don't hear back I'll assume 'yes'. -Doug "Patil, Sanjay" <> 08/09/2006 08:02 PM To <> cc Subject [ws-rx] FW: [Fwd: WS-RX Public Review] In preparation for the PR, the OASIS staff has suggested the following update to our specifications. This is a boiler-plate, pro forma change and I would not expect any objections to this as such. Nevertheless, we could talk about this on tomorrow's call and decide to apply this change for the next revision (due after tomorrow's call), which would be a PR candidate as per our current plans. Marc, could you please include Mary's suggestion in your list of new issues. Kudos to our editors team that the OASIS staff could not raise any major red flags. -- Sanjay -----Original Message----- From: Mary McRae [mailto:] Sent: Wednesday, Aug 09, 2006 16:19 PM To: Patil, Sanjay; ; 'Paul Fremantle' Subject: RE: [Fwd: WS-RX Public Review] Hi Patil, It looks fine, except for the status section. Please update the text to match the template - particularly noting how to submit comments - as shown below: ------------ This document was last revised or approved by the [TC name] on the above date. The level of approval is also listed above. Check the current location noted above for possible later revisions of this document. This document is updated periodically on no particular schedule. Technical Committee members should send comments on this specification to the Technical Committee's email list. Others should send comments to the Technical Committee by using the "Send A Comment" button on the Technical Committee's web page at www.oasis-open.org/committees/[specific-location]. For information on whether any patents have been disclosed that may be essential to implementing this specification, and any offers of patent licensing terms, please refer to the Intellectual Property Rights section of the Technical Committee web page ( www.oasis-open.org/committees/[specific-location]/ ipr.php. The non-normative errata page for this specification is located at www.oasis-open.org/committees/[specific-location]. ------------ Other than that it looks good to go. The good news is that both comment lists and the members announce list appear to be functioning properly (other than archives) so I can actually make the announcement once the documents are approved and submitted. Regards, Mary > -----Original Message----- > From: Patil, Sanjay [mailto:] > Sent: Wednesday, August 09, 2006 6:09 PM > To: ; Paul Fremantle > Subject: RE: [Fwd: WS-RX Public Review] > > > Hi Mary, > > The candidate PR drafts are at > http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/19583/WSRM-CD4.zip. > This package does not yet include an HTML version and our > editors team is currently working on it. Meanwhile, could you > please take a look at the other formats (PDF, ODT) and let us > know if they look alright. It will be great to get your > feedback by tomorrow (8/10) before 1 PM Pacific, since that's > when our TC meets and we plan to finalize the content of PR > drafts during this meeting. Sorry for the short notice. > > -- Sanjay > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Mary McRae [mailto:] > > Sent: Thursday, Aug 03, 2006 14:06 PM > > To: 'Paul Fremantle'; Patil, Sanjay > > Subject: RE: [Fwd: WS-RX Public Review] > > > > Hi Paul, > > > > Hopefully the comment lists will be functional in the next day or > > two; there's no need to *set up* anything as this was done > for all TCs > > at the same time. The most important thing is to make sure the > > specification is in the proper format - please check the > templates at > > docs.oasis-open.org/templates/ and make sure that you have the > > appropriate cover page boilerplate text, notice, etc. > > > > When you're ready to make the formal submission, note > that I'll need > > the spec in three formats: editable source, HTML, and PDF. > > > > That should be it, but please feel free to send me a > pointer to the > > spec and I'll do a quick check before you produce all of > the versions > > and point out anything that should be changed. > > > > Mary > > > > > > > > > > -------- Original Message -------- > > > Subject: WS-RX Public Review > > > Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2006 23:05:45 +0100 > > > From: Paul Fremantle <> > > > To: Mary McRae <>, "Patil, Sanjay" > > > <> > > > > > > > > > > > > Mary > > > > > > The WS-RX TC has now closed all substantive issues, and we are > > > aiming to have a vote for CD and PR on the call 8/17. We > would like > > > to be ahead of the game in terms of getting > > ready for that. > > > > > > Our issues editor is starting to prepare for capturing any raised > > > issues. I believe we need to setup the comments list > using the new > > > comments facility. And we need to inform you. > > > Have I missed anything? > > > > > > What else can we do to be aforehand in our preparations? > > > > > > Yours, > > > Paul > > > > > > -- > > > > > > Paul Fremantle > > > VP/Technology, WSO2 and OASIS WS-RX TC Co-chair > > > > > > http://feeds.feedburner.com/bloglines/pzf > > > > > > > > > "Oxygenating the Web Service Platform", www.wso2.com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > Paul Fremantle > > > VP/Technology, WSO2 and OASIS WS-RX TC Co-chair > > > > > > http://feeds.feedburner.com/bloglines/pzf > > > > > > > > > "Oxygenating the Web Service Platform", www.wso2.com > > > > > > >
Next in thread →
Next in month →