Comments lines
Cheers
Gudge
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Marc Goodner [mailto:]
> Sent: 09 February 2006 20:45
> To: Dittmann, Werner;
> Subject: [ws-sx] Issue 28: Multiple supporting tokens of the
> same type?
>
> This is now logged as issue 28.
>
> Marc Goodner
> Technical Diplomat
> Microsoft Corporation
> Tel: (425) 703-1903
> Blog: http://spaces.msn.com/mrgoodner/
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dittmann, Werner [mailto:]
> Sent: Thursday, February 09, 2006 12:13 AM
> To:
> Cc: Marc Goodner
> Subject: [ws-sx] NEW Issue: Multiple supporting tokens of the
> same type?
>
> PLEASE DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL OR START A DISCUSSISON THREAD UNTIL
> THE ISSUE IS ASSIGNED A NUMBER.
>
> The issues coordinators will notify the list when that has occurred.
>
> Protocol: ws-sp
> ws-securitypolicy-1.2-spec-ed-01-r03-diff.pdf
>
> Artifact: spec
>
> Type: design
>
> Title: Multiple supporting tokens of the same type?
>
> Description:
>
> Can a Policy have more than one supporting token (of the same type),
> e.g. multiple SupportingTokens or multiple EndorsingSupportingTokens?
[MJG]
Yes.
>
> Related issues:
> none
>
> Proposed Resolution:
>
> IMHO we need an "overall" ws-sp outline to define which assertions are
> allowed at a specific level, for example similar to
> (a)symmetric binding
> outline but for to top level policy file.
[MJG]
The intent of Appendix A ( and other text in the spec that talks to the
scope of the various assertions ) is to specify which assertions can
appear on which WSDL constructs. I'm not sure it makes any sense to
specify such things in terms of location in a policy file...
>
> Werner Dittmann
> Siemens COM MN CC BD TO
> mailto:
> Tel: +49(0)89 636 50265
> Mobil: +49(0)172 85 85 245
>
