Comments inline
Cheers
Gudge
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Marc Goodner [mailto:]
> Sent: 09 February 2006 20:51
> To: Dittmann, Werner;
> Subject: [ws-sx] Issue 31: Clarification for UsernameToken assertion
>
> This is now logged as issue 31.
>
> Marc Goodner
> Technical Diplomat
> Microsoft Corporation
> Tel: (425) 703-1903
> Blog: http://spaces.msn.com/mrgoodner/
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dittmann, Werner [mailto:]
> Sent: Thursday, February 09, 2006 12:18 AM
> To:
> Cc: Marc Goodner
> Subject: [ws-sx] NEW Issue: Clarification for UsernameToken assertion
>
> PLEASE DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL OR START A DISCUSSISON THREAD UNTIL
> THE ISSUE IS ASSIGNED A NUMBER.
>
> The issues coordinators will notify the list when that has occurred.
>
> Protocol: ws-sp
> ws-securitypolicy-1.2-spec-ed-01-r03-diff.pdf
>
> Artifact: spec
>
> Type: design
>
> Title: Clarification for UsernameToken assertion
>
> Description:
>
> The UsernameToken defines additonal (optional) assertions that specify
> the WSS spec version. IMHO this is not enough to fully specify a
> UsernameToken. For example a UsernameToken may have a additonal
> elements such as a creation time. The WSS specs do not define in any
> way if such elements shall be included or not (some are
> recommended but
> no mandated).
[MJG]
The assumption is that if you accept, for example, UsernameTokens per
WSS 1.0, then you will accept all legal serializations
>
> Related issues:
> none
>
> Proposed Resolution:
>
> The UsernameToken assertion should be extended to better reflect the
> WSS username token elements and attributes.
>
> Werner Dittmann
> Siemens COM MN CC BD TO
> mailto:
> Tel: +49(0)89 636 50265
> Mobil: +49(0)172 85 85 245
>
