Fw: [wsbpel-reqts] Groups - Issues coordination call - agenda addedmodified

Hi,

Monica Martin, Tom Freund and I were
on the call today.   Notes on the discussion: 

 

- how to handle issues from non-members

we'd like to be able to accept these - the suggestion
was that when we get such issues, we put them in a "pending"
state and at the next TC meeting ask if there is any objection to opening
them.  We might also want to ask for a "sponsor" to submit
it formally.  We can cover this at the next meeting to make sure everyone
is ok with it. 

- agenda for next call:

proposals to vote on: issue 37, 91, 97, 99, 101 

- Would like to talk about how to tackle the issues related to 91,97 and
99 (107, 82 and 109) so we can move forward on these.  

Since Yaron didn't make the call, we weren't able
to delve into the 91,97, 99 dependency tree.  The discussion on 107
at the last call didn't seem to be moving very directly toward a resolution.
 

Yaron - any comments?

discussion of issue 34

We discussed whether it would be appropriate to formulate
a proposal to vote at this point and to what extent the alternatives should
be included in it.  Monica will prepare one that focuses on stating
the bpel requirements vs calling out the WS-Addressing spec.  I asked
that the alternative discussion include some thinking on deferring action
on this till we are closer to finalizing the spec so that whatever we decide
to do is based on the most current status.  

Monica mentioned that she may not be able to participate
on the call next week - she'll let me know by Friday if this should be
deferred to the following tc call.  

- any updates on action items agreed to in f2f for:  75, 83, 108,11,
103.  

We didn't talk about this but I'd like to go through
these action items and ask for status on the TC call next week.  Let
me know if you have any concerns with this.  

 

- start list of possibilities for handling votes at next f2f (assuming
we may not have quorum)

I'm putting together a list of things we might do
to avoid the problems with voting we had last time and will circulate it
first to this group and then the full TC before the next f2f.  Monica
suggested we specify times for people to call in to vote.  I suggested
that we might want to align those times with the roll call. 

  

I noted that we have been strictly enforcing the rule
that if you miss two out of three meetings, you get a warning and if you
miss the next one you get changed to observer.  Since we haven't had
trouble in general getting to quorum (only at f2f's) we have not been strictly
enforcing the part about the chair having discretion to change people who
have a pattern of consistently missing 2 out of 3, however we do remind
people to consider switching to observer if this is the case and many have.
 

  

- discuss vote on dates for next f2f.  After the last call, I was
told that WfMC is meeting in SF on June 21-23 (1pm) thus ovelapping the
plans we adopted to hold our meeting June 22 through noon June 24 (tues,
wed, thurs).    

I'll mention this at the next tc call and ask if there
is interest in reconsidering our vote and moving the dates of our meeting
to all day June 23 and 24 and half day June 25 (Wed, thurs and fri).