Good point – I'll add for the next
draft – I'd suggest that we all use SOAP 1.1 since it is the most widely
used.
From: Eric Gravengaard
[mailto:]
Sent: Friday, March 28, 2003 10:37 AM
To: Chris
Kaler; Web Services Security
Subject: RE: [wss] 2nd draft of
interop 1 scenarios
Chris,
You use the SOAP/1.1 envelope namespace in your scenarios
for the interop. The current version of the spec uses the SOAP/1.2 envelope
namespace. Can we agree to use the 1.1 namespace for interop or should we
expect a mixture of SOAP versions? I believe it will be easier to get interop
to work if we are all using the same namespace, but we should be aware that
S:role is only available in the 1.2 namespace.
-Eric
-----Original Message-----
From: Chris
Kaler [mailto:]
Sent: Friday, March 28, 2003 9:26 AM
To: Web Services Security
Subject: [wss] 2nd draft of
interop 1 scenarios
Revised based on discussions from Tuesday's call
