RE: [wss] 2nd draft of interop 1 scenarios

From
Eric Gravengaard <>
Date
2003-04-17T19:03:27+00:00
ID
Thread
RE: [wss] 2nd draft of interop 1 scenarios
Chris,

 

Should the 
<xenc:EncryptedData> element precede the <xenc:EncryptedKey> element 
in the header of the SOAP message in the second scenario example? We are trying 
out our implementation and thought that the proper order would have been to have 
the key first and then the data since the processing rules would have been 
something like: add username/password token, then encrypt it and then add the 
key which would result in an order of: <xenc:EncryptedKey/> then 
<xenc:EncryptedData>.

 

from draft 11 
(merged) lines 954...

When a sender or an 
intermediary encrypts portion(s) of a SOAP 
message using XML 
Encryption they MUST prepend a sub-element to the 
<wsse:Security> header 
block. Furthermore, the encrypting party MUST prepend the sub-element into the 
<wsse:Security> header 
block for the targeted recipient that is expected to decrypt these encrypted 
portions. 

-Eric

 

-----Original Message-----
From: Chris Kaler 
[mailto:]
Sent: Friday, March 28, 2003 9:26 
AM
To: Web Services Security
Subject: [wss] 2nd draft of 
interop 1 scenarios

Revised based on discussions from 
Tuesday's call