* Evan Lenz
|
| I like the term used by the XPath 1.0 spec: "expanded-name" (or,
| depending on your naming convention of choice, "expanded_name",
| etc.)
Yes, that works. The definition fits very closely, it appears in an
official document, and the connection between the name and what it
signifies is pretty logical.
* Tim Bray
|
| Universal names? Unames?
Not as logical as exanded name, but if it had been in official use I
think I would have accepted it. I prefer expanded name, though.
Thanks a lot, both of you!
--
Lars Marius Garshol, Ontopian <URL: http://www.ontopia.net >
ISO SC34/WG3, OASIS GeoLang TC <URL: http://www.garshol.priv.no >
