Re: [xml-dev] Objections to / uses of PSVI?

Richard Tobin wrote:

> If you added items corresponding to all the schema components - so
> that you could examine content models, type inheritance, datatype
> facets and so on - you would need at least two dozen.

Very much agreed, and that seems to be the crux of the anti-PSVI
argument.

(The other objection is that, regardless of the schema language, you end
up couching types in terms of XML Schemas types, since that is the data
model used.)

-- Ron