Re: [xml-dev] Objections to / uses of PSVI?

Mike Champion wrote:

> It's unfortunate that the debate has been cast in terms of
> "characters" vs "types."  It should be about "which types are so
> universal that they can be supported deep in XML without undermining
> the reasons for its success" and "how can type information be passed
> around in a way that is useful for type-aware applications and
> unobtrusive to character-only applications."

Agreed.

-- Ron