Re: [xml-dev] mischief

Klotz, Leigh wrote:
> It should have been CDATA, of course.  I just feel sympathy for those who
> have to ship non-XML (i.e., HTML or template languages, or big TIFF files).

Yes, that is a problem shared by *many*. It doesn't however excuse particularly 
horrible solutions ;)

-- 
Robin Berjon <>
Research Engineer, Expway        http://expway.fr/
7FC0 6F5F D864 EFB8 08CE  8E74 58E6 D5DB 4889 2488