Right, my point is that sticking your head in the sand (a la
http://www.xml.com/pub/a/2003/02/26/binaryxml.html ) is not a particularly
good solution either.
-----Original Message-----
From: Robin Berjon [mailto:]
Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2003 1:09 AM
To: Klotz, Leigh
Cc: ''
Subject: Re: [xml-dev] mischief
Klotz, Leigh wrote:
> It should have been CDATA, of course. I just feel sympathy for those who
> have to ship non-XML (i.e., HTML or template languages, or big TIFF
files).
Yes, that is a problem shared by *many*. It doesn't however excuse
particularly
horrible solutions ;)
--
Robin Berjon <>
Research Engineer, Expway http://expway.fr/
7FC0 6F5F D864 EFB8 08CE 8E74 58E6 D5DB 4889 2488
