RE: [xri] Minutes of 9 January 2003 XRI TC

Jamie,

 

I'll 
work with Gabe to update the minutes with the content that you point out that I 
missed.  It was hard to keep with the lively discussion sometimes. ;)  

 

Mike

  
-----Original Message-----
From: James Bryce Clark 
  [mailto:]
Sent: Monday, January 13, 2003 11:05 
  AM
To: ''
Subject: Re: [xri] 
  Minutes of 9 January 2003 XRI TC

At 
  08:30 PM 1/12/2003 -0800, Lindelsee, Mike wrote:

  Everyone, please review these 
    minutes at your earliest convenience for
accuracy and ACTION items.  
    Please report errors by replying to 
  this
message.
    Hi Mike, thanks for 
  doing the minutes.  
    I was the one who raised the 
  question of whether RF policy, which appears in some prior XRI docs and seems 
  to be the intent of most  initiators, also should be added to the 
  charter.  
    The draft minutes note Karl Best's 
  observation that many TCs rely wholly on the OASIS IPR polices, which permit 
  RAND, but omit the next point discussed, i.e., that several that  have 
  successfully adopted stricter rules.   Incorporation of RAND-limited 
  tech may be appropriate in some standards -- that's a hot issue in our 
  industry right now, and one I do not propose to solve here.  But I am 
  fairly sure that, in our case, the KM resource discovery scheme XRI 
  contemplates must be wholly free of IPR  restrictions to be successfully 
  deployed.  
    As we deferred charter approval, I will 
  move to amend a RF requirement into the charter when it comes back to the 
  agenda.  
    Regards    
Jamie