kmip-interop-tech — archive
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
— [Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [Month Index]
| [List Home]
TC-312-12 (was RE: [kmip-interop-tech] Testing extension)
On 18/01/2016 10:38 PM, John Leiseboer wrote:
> Even if I could be convinced that Option 1 is more consistent with the mythical "KMIP model", the advantages of Scenario 2 above should be enough to at the very least support my request that Option 2 behaviour be permitted in addition to Option 1 in the TC-312-12 test case. As the two behaviours do not result in the same handling when referencing Cryptographic Parameters it should be abundantly clear that requesting both behaviours be considered valid goes against the fundamental goals of KMIP - interoperability. Tim.
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
— [Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [Month Index]
| [List Home]