legalxml-sc — archive
Re: [legalxml-sc] Tomorrow's call
MHonArc v2.5.0b2 -->legalxml-sc message
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [legalxml-sc] Tomorrow's call
- From: "Dallas Powell" <[email protected]>
- To: <[email protected]>
- Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2004 02:37:22 -0700
|
I regret that I will be in flight tomorrow during
the conference call. It the flight has phones I will call in, otherwise here are
my comments. - Dallas
- As for the agenda, if no one is willing to
volunteer, I would be willing to help in a presentation for our TC to the
general body.
- I see from the email today that OASIS has
scheduled court Filing and Integrated Justice meetings but it does not say
when.
- As for what is being paid for, I will leave it up
to committee.
- As for Lawful Intercept, if there have not been
any participation, rather than reviewing the charter, I would prefer a committee
be closed if there is no activity and let a new committee be formed when enough
people are willing to participate.
- I am very interested in knowing if eNotification
has made any progress. I know that in Utah we went around the entire
problem of notarization by substitution of digital signatures and certificate
verification as the third party participant in signature verification. We
did this because of the patents that Arcanvs now owned by the Canopy Group (also
the owners of SCO) control which makes it difficult to not pay royalties.
I also heard that Digital Signature Trust settled on a law suite with Arcanvs
because of their patents.
|
- References:
- Tomorrow's call
- From: "John Greacen" <[email protected]>
- Tomorrow's call
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]