ubl-jplsc — archive
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
— [Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [Month Index]
| [List Home]
Re: [ubl-tsc] Re: clarification on your comment for UBL 2.0 review
MHonArc v2.5.0b2 -->ubl-jplsc message
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [ubl-tsc] Re: clarification on your comment for UBL 2.0 review
- From: "Yukinori Saito" <[email protected]>
- To: "Tim McGrath" <[email protected]>
- Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 19:14:29 +0900
|
Dear Tim McGrath,
I think that your adding statement is OK. The followings are my comments regarding the place of
your adding statement in the UBL V2.0 specification (index.html).
(1) The table in the section 5.2.1 Party Roles
I think that the definition in the description column of
Consignor would be changed to your proposed statement.
(2) Section 5.8 Initiate Transport Services
Collaboration
There are some statements (6 lines) regarding transportation
business process in the Section 5.8 Initiate
Transport Services Collaboration.
I think that some guide statement (like your proposed
statements) would be better to add.
We (JPLSC) will hold the F2F meeting on May 24,
2006.
We will discuss about this issue.
If the other comments will be arisen, I will inform you the
comments.
Best Regards,
Yukinori Saito
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
— [Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [Month Index]
| [List Home]
|