ubl-ndrsc — archive

Re: [ubl-ndrsc] FW: [ebxml-msg] Docbook,was: Errata Format and Style etc

From: Eve Maler
To: [email protected]
Date: Fri, 08 Nov 2002 10:50:00 -0000

 MHonArc v2.5.2 -->


















ubl-ndrsc message






[Date Prev]
 | [Thread Prev]
 | [Thread Next]
 | [Date Next]

--

[Date Index]
 | [Thread Index]
 | [Elist Home]








Subject: Re: [ubl-ndrsc] FW: [ebxml-msg] Docbook,was: Errata Format and Style etc




From: "Eve L. Maler" <[email protected]>
To: "UBL-NDRSC (E-mail)" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 08 Nov 2002 10:48:45 -0500






Check out this OASIS site:

   http://www.oasis-open.org/spectools/

You'll find DocBook tools there...

Tim McGrath wrote:
> this is something that should apply to all UBL documentation for public 
> consumption..  maybe this is a task for 'tools and techniques' - to 
> evaulate docbook and recommend ways (and some tools with which) we can 
> use it.
> 
> We are starting to think about UBL 1p00 as an OASIS spec so we should be 
> planning this format now.
> 
> well volunteered Gunther!
> 
> 
> 
> Stuhec, Gunther wrote:
> 
>>Hello all,
>>
>>Matthew MacKenzie recommends the ebXML Messaging group to be begin using docbook. I guess, we should do the same for our representation of documentation and descriptions. Matthew told that Norman Walsh has put together a package to help OASIS spec authors to use docbook. And Matthew used that for a proposal for the RegRep group. I might be a good idea to look into this package, too. What do you think about it.
>>
>>Kind regards,
>>
>>	Gunther
>>
>>