[OASIS Issue Tracker] (UBL-50) Can we use the DigitalCapability document as TPA ?

[OASIS Issues Tracker <workgroup_mailer@lists.oasis-open.org>]

    [ https://issues.oasis-open.org/browse/UBL-50?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=63966#comment-63966 ] 

Roberto Cisternino commented on UBL-50:
---------------------------------------

Oh today I was not working cause here is an holiday, anyway I intended the sender as an initiator of the agreement. I think there is always an initiator either private or a body like OpenPEPPOL.
An agreement could be between parties (something like P2P), or between a party and its service provider (Access Point) and between service providers.
ParticipantParty is ok but how can I know who is the sender if I am using UBL without an envelope or even I don't use a business network and just P2P ?

Does it makes sense to keep the initiator as sender ?

InitiatorParty (1..0)
ParticipantParty (1..n)
GoverningParty (0..1) is ok (better than HubParty)


> Can we use the DigitalCapability document as TPA ?
> --------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: UBL-50
>                 URL: https://issues.oasis-open.org/browse/UBL-50
>             Project: OASIS Universal Business Language (UBL) TC
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Documents and business objects
>            Reporter: Roberto Cisternino
>            Assignee: Roberto Cisternino
>            Priority: Minor
>              Labels: DigitalCapability, TPA
>
> I found the DigitalCapability document is quite close to a TPA (Trading Partner Agreeement) or more precisely to an e-TPA.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2.2#6258)