[OASIS Issue Tracker] (UBL-50) Can we use the DigitalCapability document as TPA ?

[OASIS Issues Tracker <workgroup_mailer@lists.oasis-open.org>]

    [ https://issues.oasis-open.org/browse/UBL-50?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=63972#comment-63972 ] 

Ken Holman commented on UBL-50:
-------------------------------

In order to incorporate an initiator, would this be more appropriate?

   GoverningParty 0..1
   ParticipantParty 1..n

Then define ParticipantParty as:

  InitiatorIndicator 0..1
  Party 1

That way not only will this allow for a number of initiators (say three parties collaborate to start a group of ten), but if we come up with other participation properties they would be added to the ParticipantParty ABIE.

> Can we use the DigitalCapability document as TPA ?
> --------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: UBL-50
>                 URL: https://issues.oasis-open.org/browse/UBL-50
>             Project: OASIS Universal Business Language (UBL) TC
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Documents and business objects
>            Reporter: Roberto Cisternino
>            Assignee: Roberto Cisternino
>            Priority: Minor
>              Labels: DigitalCapability, TPA
>
> I found the DigitalCapability document is quite close to a TPA (Trading Partner Agreeement) or more precisely to an e-TPA.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2.2#6258)