xacml — archive

RE: [xacml] New work item for obligations "fulfill" vs. "understa nd"?

From: Michiharu Kudo <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2003 02:47:00 -0000

 MHonArc v2.5.0b2 -->

















xacml message






[Date Prev]
 | [Thread Prev]
 | [Thread Next]
 | [Date Next]

--

[Date Index]
 | [Thread Index]
 | [List Home]








Subject: RE: [xacml] New work item for obligations "fulfill" vs. "understa	nd"?




From: Michiharu Kudoh <[email protected]>
To: "'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>,  Tim Moses <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2003 11:52:39 +0900











I also agree...
Please put my name as a champion of this new work item.
I will draft the revision.

Michiharu



                                                                                                                                        
                      Tim Moses                                                                                                         
                      <tim.moses@entrus        To:       "'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>, "'XACML TC'"                
                      t.com>                    <[email protected]>                                                            
                                               cc:                                                                                      
                      2003/11/26 02:17         Subject:  RE: [xacml] New work item for obligations "fulfill" vs. "understa       nd"?   
                                                                                                                                        
                                                                                                                                        
                                                                                                                                        



Anne - Please do so.  I agree the wording is confusing.  All the best.
Tim.