xacml — archive

RE: [xacml] New work item for obligations "fulfill" vs. "understa nd"?

From: Anne Anderson <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2003 13:02:00 -0000

 MHonArc v2.5.0b2 -->


















xacml message






[Date Prev]
 | [Thread Prev]
 | [Thread Next]
 | [Date Next]

--

[Date Index]
 | [Thread Index]
 | [List Home]








Subject: RE: [xacml] New work item for obligations "fulfill" vs. "understa	nd"?




From: Anne Anderson <[email protected]>
To: "'XACML TC'" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2003 08:07:44 -0500






Done.  New work item, with Michiharu as champion.

Anne

On 26 November, Michiharu Kudoh writes: RE: [xacml] New work item for obligations "fulfill" vs. "understa	nd"?
 > From: Michiharu Kudoh <[email protected]>
 > To: "'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>,
 >  Tim Moses <[email protected]>
 > Cc: 'XACML TC' <[email protected]>
 > Subject: RE: [xacml] New work item for obligations "fulfill" vs. "understa	nd"?
 > Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2003 11:52:39 +0900
 > 
 > 
 > 
 > 
 > 
 > 
 > I also agree...
 > Please put my name as a champion of this new work item.
 > I will draft the revision.
 > 
 > Michiharu
 > 
 > 
 > 
 >                                                                                                                                         
 >                       Tim Moses                                                                                                         
 >                       <tim.moses@entrus        To:       "'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>, "'XACML TC'"                
 >                       t.com>                    <[email protected]>                                                            
 >                                                cc:                                                                                      
 >                       2003/11/26 02:17         Subject:  RE: [xacml] New work item for obligations "fulfill" vs. "understa       nd"?   
 >                                                                                                                                         
 >                                                                                                                                         
 >                                                                                                                                         
 > 
 > 
 > 
 > Anne - Please do so.  I agree the wording is confusing.  All the best.
 > Tim.
 > 
 >