| 00000 |
HTTP error response code |
prasanta behera
|
2006-06-01 16:31 |
| 00001 |
RE: [saml-dev] HTTP error response code |
Scott Cantor
|
2006-06-01 19:35 |
| 00002 |
RE: [saml-dev] HTTP error response code |
Costello, Roger L.
|
2006-06-02 11:59 |
| 00003 |
Re: [saml-dev] HTTP error response code |
Tom Scavo
|
2006-06-02 12:36 |
| 00004 |
RE: [saml-dev] HTTP error response code |
Costello, Roger L.
|
2006-06-02 13:54 |
| 00005 |
Re: [saml-dev] HTTP error response code |
Tom Scavo
|
2006-06-02 14:11 |
| 00006 |
RE: [saml-dev] HTTP error response code |
Scott Cantor
|
2006-06-02 15:32 |
| 00007 |
Re: [saml-dev] HTTP error response code |
prasanta behera
|
2006-06-02 16:24 |
| 00008 |
Seeking clarity on the SubjectConfirmation element |
Costello, Roger L.
|
2006-06-06 12:40 |
| 00009 |
Re: [saml-dev] Seeking clarity on the SubjectConfirmation element |
Tom Scavo
|
2006-06-06 12:50 |
| 00010 |
RE: [saml-dev] Seeking clarity on the SubjectConfirmation element |
Thomas Wisniewski
|
2006-06-06 12:55 |
| 00011 |
RE: [saml-dev] Seeking clarity on the SubjectConfirmation element |
Cahill, Conor P
|
2006-06-06 13:28 |
| 00012 |
A few slides on the Web Browser SSO profile. Are they correct? |
Costello, Roger L.
|
2006-06-08 13:53 |
| 00013 |
searching the archives |
Tom Scavo
|
2006-06-11 15:16 |
| 00014 |
RE: [saml-dev] searching the archives |
Darryl Champagne
|
2006-06-12 06:44 |
| 00015 |
Re: [saml-dev] searching the archives |
Tom Scavo
|
2006-06-12 12:27 |
| 00016 |
Why is ID of type ID, whereas InResponseTo is of type NCName? And why is AssertionIDRef of type NCName? |
Costello, Roger L.
|
2006-06-12 12:38 |
| 00017 |
RE: [saml-dev] Why is ID of type ID, whereas InResponseTo is of type NCName? And why is AssertionIDRef of type NCName? |
Cahill, Conor P
|
2006-06-12 13:48 |
| 00018 |
RE: [saml-dev] Why is ID of type ID, whereas InResponseTo is of type NCName? And why is AssertionIDRef of type NCName? |
Scott Cantor
|
2006-06-12 14:41 |
| 00019 |
OpenSAML2.0 |
Goelen, Jurgen
|
2006-06-13 12:26 |
| 00020 |
Re: [saml-dev] OpenSAML2.0 |
Tom Scavo
|
2006-06-13 13:01 |
| 00021 |
SSO Browser profile question |
Goelen, Jurgen
|
2006-06-13 14:24 |
| 00022 |
RE: [saml-dev] SSO Browser profile question |
Cahill, Conor P
|
2006-06-13 14:28 |
| 00023 |
RE: [saml-dev] SSO Browser profile question |
Thomas Wisniewski
|
2006-06-13 14:47 |
| 00024 |
use of protocolSupportEnumeration |
Tom Scavo
|
2006-06-14 21:35 |
| 00025 |
Re: [saml-dev] use of protocolSupportEnumeration |
Scott Cantor
|
2006-06-15 03:34 |
| 00026 |
Re: [saml-dev] use of protocolSupportEnumeration |
Tom Scavo
|
2006-06-15 18:01 |
| 00027 |
RE: [saml-dev] use of protocolSupportEnumeration |
Scott Cantor
|
2006-06-15 18:47 |
| 00028 |
Re: [saml-dev] use of protocolSupportEnumeration |
Tom Scavo
|
2006-06-16 13:12 |
| 00029 |
RE: [saml-dev] use of protocolSupportEnumeration |
Scott Cantor
|
2006-06-16 17:14 |
| 00030 |
RE: [saml-dev] use of protocolSupportEnumeration |
Scott Cantor
|
2006-06-16 17:18 |
| 00031 |
Re: [saml-dev] use of protocolSupportEnumeration |
Tom Scavo
|
2006-06-16 17:54 |
| 00032 |
Does John Doe actually have to hit a Submit button to send the encrypted Authentication Response to CarRentalInc? |
Costello, Roger L.
|
2006-06-19 13:58 |
| 00033 |
Re: [saml-dev] Does John Doe actually have to hit a Submit button to send the encrypted Authentication Response to CarRentalInc? |
Tom Scavo
|
2006-06-19 14:41 |
| 00034 |
RE: [saml-dev] Does John Doe actually have to hit a Submit button to send the encrypted Authentication Response to CarRentalInc? |
Cahill, Conor P
|
2006-06-19 15:28 |
| 00035 |
The Core specification is the only "mandatory" specification, the others are just helpful guidelines, right? |
Costello, Roger L.
|
2006-06-19 17:26 |
| 00036 |
Re: [saml-dev] The Core specification is the only "mandatory"specification, the others are just helpful guidelines, right? |
Fric Siffany
|
2006-06-19 17:59 |
| 00037 |
Re: [saml-dev] The Core specification is the only "mandatory" specification, the others are just helpful guidelines, right? |
Tom Scavo
|
2006-06-19 21:07 |
| 00038 |
Seeking clarity on the Conformance specification, Table 2 |
Costello, Roger L.
|
2006-06-20 11:55 |
| 00039 |
Re: [saml-dev] Seeking clarity on the Conformance specification,Table 2 |
Fric Siffany
|
2006-06-20 13:15 |
| 00040 |
Seeking clarification of Name ID Management Profile |
Palmer, Mark
|
2006-06-20 13:48 |
| 00041 |
RE: [saml-dev] Seeking clarification of Name ID Management Profile |
Scott Cantor
|
2006-06-20 14:14 |
| 00042 |
RE: [saml-dev] Seeking clarification of Name ID Management Profile |
Palmer, Mark
|
2006-06-21 11:54 |
| 00043 |
RE: [saml-dev] Seeking clarification of Name ID Management Profile |
Scott Cantor
|
2006-06-21 15:15 |
| 00044 |
How does an artifact issuer "authenticate" the sender of the <ArtifactResolve> message? |
Costello, Roger L.
|
2006-06-22 12:50 |
| 00045 |
Re: [saml-dev] How does an artifact issuer "authenticate" the sender of the <ArtifactResolve> message? |
Tom Scavo
|
2006-06-22 13:17 |
| 00046 |
RE: [saml-dev] How does an artifact issuer "authenticate" the sender of the <ArtifactResolve> message? |
Philpott, Robert
|
2006-06-22 13:20 |
| 00047 |
RE: [saml-dev] How does an artifact issuer "authenticate" the sender of the <ArtifactResolve> message? |
Scott Cantor
|
2006-06-22 14:07 |
| 00048 |
RE: [saml-dev] How does an artifact issuer "authenticate" the sender of the <ArtifactResolve> message? |
Cahill, Conor P
|
2006-06-22 16:23 |
| 00049 |
RE: [saml-dev] How does an artifact issuer "authenticate" the sender of the <ArtifactResolve> message? |
Scott Cantor
|
2006-06-22 17:30 |
| 00050 |
searching for a use case |
Tom Scavo
|
2006-06-23 23:07 |
| 00051 |
RE: [saml-dev] searching for a use case |
Cahill, Conor P
|
2006-06-23 23:24 |
| 00052 |
Re: [saml-dev] searching for a use case |
Tom Scavo
|
2006-06-23 23:31 |
| 00053 |
RE: [saml-dev] searching for a use case |
Cahill, Conor P
|
2006-06-23 23:36 |
| 00054 |
Re: [saml-dev] searching for a use case |
Tom Scavo
|
2006-06-23 23:44 |
| 00055 |
RE: [saml-dev] searching for a use case |
Cahill, Conor P
|
2006-06-23 23:56 |
| 00056 |
Re: [saml-dev] use of protocolSupportEnumeration |
Tom Scavo
|
2006-06-25 16:46 |
| 00057 |
RE: [saml-dev] use of protocolSupportEnumeration |
Scott Cantor
|
2006-06-25 19:41 |
| 00058 |
All profiles (in the Profile Specification) depend on the involvement of a browser - True or False? |
Costello, Roger L.
|
2006-06-27 13:10 |
| 00059 |
RE: [saml-dev] All profiles (in the Profile Specification) depend on the involvement of a browser - True or False? |
Scott Cantor
|
2006-06-27 13:13 |
| 00060 |
RE: [saml-dev] All profiles (in the Profile Specification) depend on the involvement of a browser - True or False? |
Costello, Roger L.
|
2006-06-27 13:25 |
| 00061 |
Re: [saml-dev] All profiles (in the Profile Specification) depend on the involvement of a browser - True or False? |
Tom Scavo
|
2006-06-27 13:36 |
| 00062 |
RE: [saml-dev] All profiles (in the Profile Specification) depend on the involvement of a browser - True or False? |
Scott Cantor
|
2006-06-27 13:45 |
| 00063 |
Seeking a high-level understanding of the Name Identifier Mapping Protocol |
Costello, Roger L.
|
2006-06-27 20:20 |
| 00064 |
RE: [saml-dev] Seeking a high-level understanding of the Name Identifier Mapping Protocol |
Scott Cantor
|
2006-06-28 02:40 |
| 00065 |
RE: [saml-dev] Seeking a high-level understanding of the Name Identifier Mapping Protocol |
Costello, Roger L.
|
2006-06-28 19:18 |
| 00066 |
RE: [saml-dev] Seeking a high-level understanding of the Name Identifier Mapping Protocol |
Scott Cantor
|
2006-06-29 03:48 |
