| 00000 |
RE: Timing of Liaison calls |
Mark Combellack
|
2008-08-01 15:20 |
| 00001 |
RE: [sca-j] RE: Timing of Liaison calls |
Patil, Sanjay
|
2008-08-01 15:29 |
| 00002 |
Re: [sca-j] RE: Timing of Liaison calls |
Mike Edwards
|
2008-08-01 15:32 |
| 00003 |
RE: [sca-j] RE: Timing of Liaison calls |
Mark Combellack
|
2008-08-02 18:47 |
| 00004 |
Groups - SCA-J Teleconf modified |
[email protected]
|
2008-08-02 19:02 |
| 00005 |
Groups - SCA-J Teleconf modified |
[email protected]
|
2008-08-02 19:30 |
| 00006 |
[NEW ISSUE] SCA Java Specifications do not Adequately Define theComponentType of a Java implementation |
Mike Edwards
|
2008-08-04 12:21 |
| 00007 |
Groups - SCA Java Minutes 2008-07-24.doc uploaded |
[email protected]
|
2008-08-04 14:17 |
| 00008 |
Groups - SCA-J Teleconf modified |
[email protected]
|
2008-08-04 14:25 |
| 00009 |
Re: [sca-j] Another early morning brainstorm - conversations revisited |
Simon Nash
|
2008-08-04 19:09 |
| 00010 |
Re: Fw: New Sub-Committee of the SCA-J TC |
Simon Nash
|
2008-08-05 20:53 |
| 00011 |
Day / time of calls for the JEE subcommittee |
Simon Nash
|
2008-08-05 20:53 |
| 00012 |
Re: [sca-j] Day / time of calls for the JEE subcommittee |
D Uamsi
|
2008-08-06 01:18 |
| 00013 |
RE: [sca-j] Day / time of calls for the JEE subcommittee |
"Oavlov, Olamen"
|
2008-08-06 06:20 |
| 00014 |
Re: [sca-j] Day / time of calls for the JEE subcommittee |
Anish Karmarkar
|
2008-08-06 06:22 |
| 00015 |
Re: [sca-j] Day / time of calls for the JEE subcommittee |
Mike Edwards
|
2008-08-06 09:02 |
| 00016 |
RE: [sca-j] Day / time of calls for the JEE subcommittee |
Simon Nash
|
2008-08-06 09:14 |
| 00017 |
RE: [sca-j] Day / time of calls for the JEE subcommittee |
Pavlov, Plamen
|
2008-08-06 10:00 |
| 00018 |
RE: [sca-j] Day / time of calls for the JEE subcommittee |
Savchenko, Vladimir
|
2008-08-06 15:06 |
| 00019 |
Re: [sca-j] Another early morning brainstorm - conversations revisited |
Jim Marino
|
2008-08-06 23:18 |
| 00020 |
Re: [sca-j] Another early morning brainstorm - conversations revisited |
Simon Nash
|
2008-08-07 11:41 |
| 00021 |
Re: [sca-j] Day / time of calls for the JEE subcommittee |
ashok malhotra
|
2008-08-07 21:28 |
| 00022 |
ISSUE 25: Detailed proposal for non-conversational callbacks |
Simon Nash
|
2008-08-07 22:45 |
| 00023 |
Re: [sca-j] Another early morning brainstorm - conversations revisited |
Jim Marino
|
2008-08-07 22:54 |
| 00024 |
Re: [sca-j] Another early morning brainstorm - conversations revisited |
Simon Nash
|
2008-08-08 10:23 |
| 00025 |
Re: [sca-j] Another early morning brainstorm - conversations revisited |
Mike Edwards
|
2008-08-08 12:02 |
| 00026 |
Re: [sca-j] Another early morning brainstorm - conversations revisited |
Mike Edwards
|
2008-08-08 12:22 |
| 00027 |
Re: [sca-j] Another early morning brainstorm - conversations revisited |
Bryan Aupperle
|
2008-08-08 13:08 |
| 00028 |
Re: [sca-j] Another early morning brainstorm - conversations revisited |
Jim Marino
|
2008-08-08 13:08 |
| 00029 |
RE: New Sub-Committee of the SCA-J TC |
Simon Nash
|
2008-08-08 13:46 |
| 00030 |
RE: New Sub-Committee of the SCA-J TC |
Mary McRae
|
2008-08-08 14:10 |
| 00031 |
Groups - SCA Java Minutes 2008-08-04.doc uploaded |
[email protected]
|
2008-08-08 14:20 |
| 00032 |
Re: [sca-j] Another early morning brainstorm - conversations revisited |
Simon Nash
|
2008-08-08 14:34 |
| 00033 |
Re: [sca-j] Another early morning brainstorm - conversations revisited |
Mike Edwards
|
2008-08-08 15:35 |
| 00034 |
RE: New Sub-Committee of the SCA-J TC |
Simon Nash
|
2008-08-08 15:59 |
| 00035 |
Re: [sca-j] Another early morning brainstorm - conversations revisited |
Jim Marino
|
2008-08-08 16:11 |
| 00036 |
RE: [sca-j] RE: New Sub-Committee of the SCA-J TC |
Mary McRae
|
2008-08-08 16:14 |
| 00037 |
Re: [sca-j] Day / time of calls for the JEE subcommittee |
Simon Nash
|
2008-08-08 21:39 |
| 00038 |
Re: [sca-j] Another early morning brainstorm - conversations revisited |
Simon Nash
|
2008-08-08 22:03 |
| 00039 |
Re: [sca-j] ISSUE 25: Detailed proposal for non-conversational callbacks |
Jim Marino
|
2008-08-08 22:10 |
| 00040 |
Groups - SCA-J Teleconf modified |
[email protected]
|
2008-08-08 22:26 |
| 00041 |
Re: [sca-j] Another early morning brainstorm - conversations revisited |
Jim Marino
|
2008-08-09 11:52 |
| 00042 |
Re: [sca-j] ISSUE 25: Detailed proposal for non-conversational callbacks |
Jim Marino
|
2008-08-09 12:09 |
| 00043 |
Re: [sca-j] [NEW ISSUE]: Section 7.1 of the Java CAA Specificationis unclear |
Anish Karmarkar
|
2008-08-11 08:17 |
| 00044 |
Groups - SCA Java Minutes 2008-08-04.doc uploaded |
[email protected]
|
2008-08-11 08:48 |
| 00045 |
Groups - SCA-J Teleconf modified |
[email protected]
|
2008-08-11 09:09 |
| 00046 |
Re: [sca-j] Another early morning brainstorm - conversations revisited |
Simon Nash
|
2008-08-11 14:31 |
| 00047 |
Re: [sca-j] ISSUE 25: Detailed proposal for non-conversational callbacks |
Simon Nash
|
2008-08-11 14:48 |
| 00048 |
test, pl. ignore |
Anish Karmarkar
|
2008-08-11 15:08 |
| 00049 |
Raw minutes SCA Java 2008-08-11 |
Jim Marino
|
2008-08-11 16:05 |
| 00050 |
Discuss: Cancelling the SCA-J Conference calls for upcoming public holidays and Christmas |
Mark Combellack
|
2008-08-12 14:31 |
| 00051 |
Re: [sca-j] ISSUE 25: Detailed proposal for non-conversational callbacks |
Meeraj Kunnumpurath
|
2008-08-12 15:38 |
| 00052 |
Re: [sca-j] Another early morning brainstorm - conversations revisited |
Jim Marino
|
2008-08-12 18:16 |
| 00053 |
Re: [sca-j] Discuss: Cancelling the SCA-J Conference calls for upcomingpublic holidays and Christmas |
Mike Edwards
|
2008-08-13 07:53 |
| 00054 |
When more than one interface with the same unqualified name used in the @Serviceannotation |
C Vamsi
|
2008-08-13 12:00 |
| 00055 |
Re: [sca-j] When more than one interface with the same unqualified nameused in the @Service annotation |
Mike Edwards
|
2008-08-13 13:23 |
| 00056 |
Re: [sca-j] When more than one interface with the same unqualified nameused in the @Service annotation |
Simon Nash
|
2008-08-13 13:55 |
| 00057 |
Re: [sca-j] ISSUE 25: Detailed proposal for non-conversational callbacks |
Mike Edwards
|
2008-08-13 14:03 |
| 00058 |
Re: [sca-j] Another early morning brainstorm - conversations revisited |
Mike Edwards
|
2008-08-13 15:07 |
| 00059 |
Re: [sca-j] ISSUE 25: Detailed proposal for non-conversational callbacks |
Simon Nash
|
2008-08-13 15:34 |
| 00060 |
Re: [sca-j] Another early morning brainstorm - conversations revisited |
Jim Marino
|
2008-08-13 17:14 |
| 00061 |
Re: [sca-j] ISSUE 25: Detailed proposal for non-conversational callbacks |
Meeraj Kunnumpurath
|
2008-08-13 22:44 |
| 00062 |
Re: [sca-j] When more than one interface with the same unqualified nameused in the @Service annotation |
D Uamsi
|
2008-08-14 09:59 |
| 00063 |
Groups - SCA Java Minutes 2008-08-11.doc uploaded |
[email protected]
|
2008-08-14 12:56 |
| 00064 |
Groups - SCA-J Teleconf modified |
[email protected]
|
2008-08-14 13:46 |
| 00065 |
Groups - SCA-J Teleconf modified |
[email protected]
|
2008-08-14 15:04 |
| 00066 |
Groups - sca-jee-1.1-spec-wd01.doc uploaded |
[email protected]
|
2008-08-15 20:24 |
| 00067 |
Groups - sca-javacaa-1.1-spec-WD04.doc uploaded |
[email protected]
|
2008-08-16 08:13 |
| 00068 |
Groups - sca-javacaa-1.1-spec-WD04.pdf uploaded |
[email protected]
|
2008-08-16 08:13 |
| 00069 |
CD candidate for javacaa spec uploaded |
Anish Karmarkar
|
2008-08-16 08:36 |
| 00070 |
ISSUE 48: Proposal |
C Vamsi
|
2008-08-18 04:57 |
| 00071 |
Re: [sca-j] CD candidate for javacaa spec uploaded |
C Vamsi
|
2008-08-18 05:20 |
| 00072 |
Re: [sca-j] CD candidate for javacaa spec uploaded |
C Vamsi
|
2008-08-18 05:25 |
| 00073 |
ISSUE 42: No longer valid due to ISSUE 37 |
C Vamsi
|
2008-08-18 07:30 |
| 00074 |
Re: [sca-j] Groups - SCA-J Teleconf modified |
Anish Karmarkar
|
2008-08-18 07:51 |
| 00075 |
Groups - SCA-J Teleconf modified |
[email protected]
|
2008-08-18 09:46 |
| 00076 |
Request to create new Sub-Committee of the SCA-J TC focusing on testing |
Mark Combellack
|
2008-08-18 10:12 |
| 00077 |
Re: [sca-j] ISSUE 42: No longer valid due to resolution of ISSUE 44: PROPOSAL |
Mike Edwards
|
2008-08-18 10:17 |
| 00078 |
Re: [sca-j] ISSUE 42: No longer valid due to resolution of ISSUE 44: PROPOSAL |
D Uamsi
|
2008-08-18 11:06 |
| 00079 |
Re: [sca-j] ISSUE 48: Proposal - update |
Mike Edwards
|
2008-08-18 12:49 |
| 00080 |
Inconsistent use of a and an when referring to annotations in the document |
C Vamsi
|
2008-08-18 13:35 |
| 00081 |
[NEW ISSUE] SCA Spring Client and Implementation Specification uses anunacceptable namespace |
Mike Edwards
|
2008-08-18 14:38 |
| 00082 |
[NEW ISSUE] SCA Spring C&I Specification does not have a normativedefinition of how to calculate the ComponentType of a Spring Applicationcontext |
Mike Edwards
|
2008-08-18 14:43 |
| 00083 |
Re: [sca-j] ISSUE 48: Proposal - update TWO |
D Uamsi
|
2008-08-18 14:45 |
| 00084 |
[NEW ISSUE] SCA Spring C & I specification does not state what happens whena Bean exposed as a service implements mutliple interfaces |
Mike Edwards
|
2008-08-18 14:51 |
| 00085 |
Re: [sca-j] ISSUE 42: No longer valid due to ISSUE 37 |
Simon Nash
|
2008-08-18 14:56 |
| 00086 |
Re: [sca-j] ISSUE 48: Proposal |
Simon Nash
|
2008-08-18 14:56 |
| 00087 |
Re: [sca-j] ISSUE 48: Proposal - update |
Simon Nash
|
2008-08-18 15:03 |
| 00088 |
Minutes |
Meeraj Kunnumpurath
|
2008-08-18 17:24 |
| 00089 |
Re: [sca-j] [Issue 57] SCA Spring Client and Implementation Specificationuses an unacceptable namespace |
Anish Karmarkar
|
2008-08-18 18:12 |
| 00090 |
Re: [sca-j] [ISSUE 58] SCA Spring C&I Specification does not havea normative definition of how to calculate the ComponentType of a SpringApplication context |
Anish Karmarkar
|
2008-08-18 18:14 |
| 00091 |
Re: [sca-j] [ISSUE 59] SCA Spring C & I specification does not statewhat happens when a Bean exposed as a service implements mutliple interfaces |
Anish Karmarkar
|
2008-08-18 18:16 |
| 00092 |
RE: [sca-j] Request to create new Sub-Committee of the SCA-J TC focusing on testing |
Mary McRae
|
2008-08-20 04:40 |
| 00093 |
Re: [sca-j-jee] basic restructure complete |
Mike Edwards
|
2008-08-20 09:52 |
| 00094 |
Groups - JEE Specification - WD03 (sca-jee-1[1].1-spec-wd03.doc) uploaded |
[email protected]
|
2008-08-22 10:54 |
| 00095 |
Groups - JEE Specification - WD03 Diagrams (sca-jee-spec-diagrams-WD03.ppt) uploaded |
[email protected]
|
2008-08-22 10:55 |
| 00096 |
Introspecting services offered by a Java implementation class without @Service |
Raymond Feng
|
2008-08-25 16:26 |
| 00097 |
Re: [sca-j] Introspecting services offered by a Java implementation classwithout @Service |
Simon Nash
|
2008-08-27 07:27 |
| 00098 |
Should introduction of @Local annotation (JAVA-3) affect the Semantics ofan Unannotated Implementation |
D Uamsi
|
2008-08-27 07:45 |
| 00099 |
Re: [sca-j] Should introduction of @Local annotation (JAVA-3) affect theSemantics of an Unannotated Implementation |
Mike Edwards
|
2008-08-27 09:42 |
| 00100 |
Re: [sca-j] Should introduction of @Local annotation (JAVA-3) affect theSemantics of an Unannotated Implementation |
Simon Nash
|
2008-08-27 16:51 |
| 00101 |
Re: [sca-j] Should introduction of @Local annotation (JAVA-3) affect theSemantics of an Unannotated Implementation |
Mike Edwards
|
2008-08-28 09:40 |
| 00102 |
Re: [sca-j] Should introduction of @Local annotation (JAVA-3) affect theSemantics of an Unannotated Implementation |
D Uamsi
|
2008-08-28 10:14 |
| 00103 |
Re: [sca-j] Should introduction of @Local annotation (JAVA-3) affect theSemantics of an Unannotated Implementation |
Simon Nash
|
2008-08-28 13:01 |
| 00104 |
Re: [sca-j] Should introduction of @Local annotation (JAVA-3) affect theSemantics of an Unannotated Implementation |
Simon Nash
|
2008-08-28 13:02 |
| 00105 |
Notice of resignation and call for nominations |
Simon Nash
|
2008-08-28 13:45 |
| 00106 |
Re: [sca-j] Notice of resignation and call for nominations |
Simon Nash
|
2008-08-29 14:37 |
| 00107 |
Re: [sca-j] Notice of resignation and call for nominations |
Jim Marino
|
2008-08-29 15:06 |
| 00108 |
Latest versions of OASIS spec documents owned by the sca-j TC |
Simon Nash
|
2008-08-29 15:23 |
| 00109 |
NEW ISSUE: Sharing Java artifacts across contributions |
David Booz
|
2008-08-29 15:52 |
