xml-dev

← back

692 messages · 177 threads

# Subject From Date
00051 Xerces Tutorial Javier Ho 2001-12-01 03:12
00043 XML with ASP V.Sunil Kumar 2001-12-01 03:52
00690 Re: [xml-dev] misprocessing namespaces (was Re: [xml-dev] There isa meaning, but it's not in the data alone) Dare Obasanjo 2001-12-01 09:24
00050 converter Detlef Brendle 2001-12-01 19:05
00005 Re: [xml-dev] converter Justin James 2001-12-01 19:18
00010 RE: [xml-dev] cached XML Files. Marsh, Drew 2001-12-02 21:52
00691 Re: [xml-dev] What is fast ? Dare Obasanjo 2001-12-02 23:42
00034 RE: [xml-dev] cached XML Files. Krakow Patrice 2001-12-03 11:55
00032 Electricity Industry XML Standards McGee. David 2001-12-03 14:12
00030 Metacrap Leigh Dodds 2001-12-03 16:23
00035 RE: [xml-dev] Metacrap Wedinger, Keith 2001-12-03 17:17
00009 A Doubt on defineing a simpleType in xml-schema file. Mariappan, MaharajanX 2001-12-04 04:39
00011 RELAX NG 1.0 released James Clark 2001-12-04 05:27
00002 RELAX NG resources updated James Clark 2001-12-04 05:52
00007 Re: [xml-dev] Metacrap Dare Obasanjo 2001-12-04 07:59
00015 RE: [xml-dev] A Doubt on defineing a simpleType in xml-schema file. Priscilla Walmsley 2001-12-04 14:29
00000 Testing, testing, 1-2-3 Gary Stephenson 2001-12-04 23:38
00028 Whither XML-DEV? Wayne Steele 2001-12-05 00:45
00037 Re: Whither XML-DEV? Gary Stephenson 2001-12-05 03:58
00038 RE: [xml-dev] Whither XML-DEV? Champion, Mike 2001-12-05 05:08
00027 Antwort: RE: [xml-dev] Whither XML-DEV? [email protected] 2001-12-05 06:47
00004 RE: [xml-dev] Whither XML-DEV? Geert Bormans 2001-12-05 07:59
00012 RE: [xml-dev] Whither XML-DEV? Gert Baudoncq 2001-12-05 08:06
00008 RE: [xml-dev] Whither XML-DEV? Champion, Mike 2001-12-05 13:00
00044 RE: [xml-dev] Whither XML-DEV? Champion, Mike 2001-12-05 13:42
00024 SAX Filters, Chapter 8 of processing XML with Java Elliotte Rusty Harold 2001-12-05 14:10
00047 Ping (apologies) Mike Moran 2001-12-05 15:06
00017 The deadline for paper submissions for XML Europe Conference 2002 is Friday, 14 December Elledge, Marion 2001-12-05 19:00
00021 Is intelligence and design over-rated? Champion, Mike 2001-12-05 20:11
00048 RE: [xml-dev] Is intelligence and design over-rated? Piatt, Darwin 2001-12-05 20:18
00020 RE: XML-Dev list Problems (re:Whither xml-dev...) [email protected] 2001-12-05 20:51
00042 Re: [xml-dev] Is intelligence and design over-rated? Gavin Thomas Nicol 2001-12-05 20:56
00052 Oracle taking off with XDB? Jens Jakob Andersen, PDI 2001-12-05 21:06
00019 Re: [xml-dev] Whither XML-DEV? Sai N 2001-12-05 21:17
00040 FW: [xml-dev] Whither XML-DEV? Stuart Celarier 2001-12-05 21:19
00022 RE: [xml-dev] Is intelligence and design over-rated? Champion, Mike 2001-12-05 21:39
00049 RELAX NG 1.0 released James Clark 2001-12-06 04:33
00041 RELAX NG resources updated James Clark 2001-12-06 04:34
00045 Where Can I get a SAX specification Oliver Shung 2001-12-06 05:22
00046 RE: [xml-dev] Where Can I get a SAX specification Gert Baudoncq 2001-12-06 08:15
00023 Re: [xml-dev] Where Can I get a SAX specification Oliver Shung 2001-12-06 09:16
00018 RE: [xml-dev] Where Can I get a SAX specification Gert Baudoncq 2001-12-06 10:01
00025 test - ignore jalal 2001-12-06 10:16
00016 Re: [xml-dev] Where Can I get a SAX specification Oliver Shung 2001-12-06 11:34
00039 RE: [xml-dev] Where Can I get a SAX specification Gert Baudoncq 2001-12-06 12:05
00006 Re: [xml-dev] Whither XML-DEV? Peter Finch 2001-12-06 12:25
00026 RE: [xml-dev] RE: XML-Dev list Problems (re:Whither xml-dev...) Leigh Dodds 2001-12-06 12:32
00003 Test - I am "subscribed" but no email coming [email protected] 2001-12-06 12:35
00013 Re: [xml-dev] RE: XML-Dev list Problems (re:Whither xml-dev...) Jeffrey Lomas 2001-12-06 16:27
00014 Re: [xml-dev] RE: XML-Dev list Problems (re:Whither xml-dev...) Jim Ancona 2001-12-06 16:41
00036 Re: [xml-dev] RE: XML-Dev list Problems (re:Whither xml-dev...) Elliotte Rusty Harold 2001-12-06 16:51
00001 parser maintains state? Wendi Sisson 2001-12-06 17:04
00031 Re: [xml-dev] RE: XML-Dev list Problems (re:Whither xml-dev...) W. E. Perry 2001-12-06 18:10
00029 Re: [xml-dev] RE: XML-Dev list Problems (re:Whither xml-dev...) Jeffrey Lomas 2001-12-06 18:12
00033 Re: [xml-dev] RE: XML-Dev list Problems (re:Whither xml-dev...) [email protected] 2001-12-06 20:09
00075 RE: [xml-dev] Attribute Order Jeff Lowery 2001-12-08 19:55
00062 RE: [xml-dev] Re: validating hairy data models (was [xml-dev] Att ribute order) Jeff Lowery 2001-12-09 09:44
00061 RE: [xml-dev] Attribute Order Jeff Lowery 2001-12-09 09:49
00139 Re: [xml-dev] Where have the element types gone? Tim Bray 2001-12-09 21:27
00105 Re: [xml-dev] Formal definition of PSVI Nogami Kenji 2001-12-10 03:15
00119 Re: [xml-dev] Formal definition of PSVI (was [xml-dev] Where have the element types gone?) Dare Obasanjo 2001-12-10 06:22
00076 RE: [xml-dev] images and urls in xml Manos Batsis 2001-12-10 08:47
00092 RE: [xml-dev] Re: validating hairy data models (was [xml-dev] Attribute order) Elliotte Rusty Harold 2001-12-10 14:20
00120 RE: [xml-dev] Attribute Order Al Snell 2001-12-10 14:27
00103 RE: [xml-dev] Dynamic XML structure from XML Schema at runtime SHARPE, Ian 2001-12-10 14:33
00118 Re: [xml-dev] Formal definition of PSVI (was [xml-dev] Where have the element types gone?) Rick Jelliffe 2001-12-10 14:53
00107 RE: [xml-dev] Attribute Order Michael Fitzgerald 2001-12-10 15:08
00080 Re: [xml-dev] Formal definition of PSVI (was [xml-dev] Where have the element types gone?) Richard Tobin 2001-12-10 16:21
00140 Re: [xml-dev] Re: validating hairy data models (was [xml-dev] Attribute order) David Brownell 2001-12-10 18:02
00149 Re: [xml-dev] Re: validating hairy data models (was [xml-dev] Attribute order) Rick Jelliffe 2001-12-10 18:39
00150 RE: [xml-dev] Re: validating hairy data models (was [xml-dev] Att ribute order) Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2001-12-10 18:58
00082 RE: [xml-dev] Attribute Order Jeff Lowery 2001-12-10 19:29
00091 RE: [xml-dev] Where have the element types gone? Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2001-12-10 19:32
00078 Re: [xml-dev] Re: validating hairy data models (was [xml-dev] Attribute order) David Brownell 2001-12-10 19:34
00093 RE: [xml-dev] Where have the element types gone? Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2001-12-10 19:59
00077 Re: [xml-dev] Re: validating hairy data models (was [xml-dev] Attribute order) Rick Jelliffe 2001-12-10 21:45
00095 RE: [xml-dev] Re: validating hairy data models (was [xml-dev] Att ribute order) Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2001-12-10 22:10
00151 Re: [xml-dev] Attribute Order Eddie Robertsson 2001-12-10 22:43
00138 Re: [xml-dev] Re: validating hairy data models (was [xml-dev] Attribute order) John Cowan 2001-12-10 22:51
00137 RE: [xml-dev] Attribute Order Jeff Lowery 2001-12-10 23:12
00152 Re: [xml-dev] Re: validating hairy data models (was [xml-dev] Attribute order) Dave Beckett 2001-12-11 00:03
00094 RE: [xml-dev] Re: validating hairy data models (was [xml-dev] Attribute order) Michael Kay 2001-12-11 08:46
00079 SV: [xml-dev] Re: validating hairy data models (was [xml-dev] Attribute order) Jens Jakob Andersen, PDI 2001-12-11 09:41
00090 Re: [xml-dev] Attribute Order Peter Finch 2001-12-11 11:10
00081 validating against the standard W3C [email protected] 2001-12-11 11:25
00116 Converting XML to RTF Selvamani 2001-12-11 11:33
00108 RE: [xml-dev] Converting XML to RTF Frank Shell 2001-12-11 11:59
00073 RE: [xml-dev] validating against the standard W3C [email protected] 2001-12-11 13:36
00074 Re: [xml-dev] validating against the standard W3C [email protected] 2001-12-11 13:36
00106 RE: [xml-dev] validating against the standard W3C Gert Baudoncq 2001-12-11 13:55
00117 RE: [xml-dev] Re: validating hairy data models (was [xml-dev] Att ribute order) Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2001-12-11 14:17
00104 RE: [xml-dev] validating against the standard W3C [email protected] 2001-12-11 14:23
00121 RE: [xml-dev] validating against the standard W3C Michael Kay 2001-12-11 14:35
00063 Re: [xml-dev] validating against the standard W3C Dare Obasanjo 2001-12-11 15:49
00146 Validating schema vs. non validating schema Krakow Patrice 2001-12-11 16:41
00064 Re: [xml-dev] validating against the standard W3C Dare Obasanjo 2001-12-11 16:54
00131 A question about a complex type Sergey Beryozkin 2001-12-11 17:14
00083 RE: [xml-dev] Validating schema vs. non validating schema Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2001-12-11 17:17
00101 RE: [xml-dev] Validating schema vs. non validating schema Krakow Patrice 2001-12-11 17:23
00100 RE: [xml-dev] validating against the standard W3C Christian Nentwich 2001-12-11 17:25
00129 is possible to declare a nillable decimal? Phil Fuhlman 2001-12-11 17:31
00085 RE: [xml-dev] validating against the standard W3C Al Snell 2001-12-11 17:31
00067 Re: [xml-dev] validating against the standard W3C Paul T 2001-12-11 17:39
00147 parser maintains state? Wendi Sisson 2001-12-11 17:54
00145 RE: [xml-dev] is possible to declare a nillable decimal? Phil Fuhlman 2001-12-11 18:40
00134 RE: [xml-dev] Validating schema vs. non validating schema Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2001-12-11 18:43
00058 RE: [xml-dev] validating against the standard W3C Jeff Lowery 2001-12-11 18:49
00123 Re: [xml-dev] validating against the standard W3C Joe English 2001-12-11 20:08
00115 Re: [xml-dev] validating against the standard W3C Jeff Rafter 2001-12-11 20:41
00113 XSL FO, keeping text on the same row [email protected] 2001-12-11 21:13
00124 Re: [xml-dev] Validating schema vs. non validating schema Marcus Carr 2001-12-11 21:57
00066 RE: [xml-dev] validating against the standard W3C Michael Kay 2001-12-11 22:04
00060 Re: [xml-dev] Converting XML to RTF Marcus Carr 2001-12-11 22:05
00068 RE: [xml-dev] validating against the standard W3C [email protected] 2001-12-12 08:55
00072 Re: [xml-dev] A question about a complex type Sergey Beryozkin 2001-12-12 09:49
00053 Slightly OT: Java, XML, JTree question Paul Johnston 2001-12-12 10:12
00126 RE: [xml-dev] Converting XML to RTF Selvamani 2001-12-12 10:24
00111 Re: [xml-dev] Converting XML to RTF Jonathan Perret 2001-12-12 10:27
00127 RE: [xml-dev] Slightly OT: Java, XML, JTree question Paul Johnston 2001-12-12 10:39
00110 RE: [xml-dev] Converting XML to RTF Gert Baudoncq 2001-12-12 10:40
00057 RE: [xml-dev] Validating schema vs. non validating schema Krakow Patrice 2001-12-12 10:46
00069 W3C WG Goals (Was Re: validating against the standard W3C) [email protected] 2001-12-12 10:47
00059 RE: [xml-dev] Slightly OT: Java, XML, JTree question Leigh Dodds 2001-12-12 10:47
00065 Re: [xml-dev] Converting XML to RTF Jonathan Perret 2001-12-12 11:01
00135 RE: [xml-dev] W3C WG Goals (Was Re: validating against the standard W3C) Michael Kay 2001-12-12 11:19
00142 Re: [xml-dev] W3C WG Goals (Was Re: validating against the standard W3C) [email protected] 2001-12-12 12:05
00055 Re: [xml-dev] validating against the standard W3C Dare Obasanjo 2001-12-12 12:23
00099 RE: [xml-dev] W3C WG Goals (Was Re: validating against the standard W3C) Michael Kay 2001-12-12 12:55
00086 Java and retrieving DTD information Paul Johnston 2001-12-12 16:53
00089 Oracle taking off with XDB? Jens Jakob Andersen, PDI 2001-12-12 17:01
00096 RE: [xml-dev] Attribute Order Michael Fitzgerald 2001-12-12 19:37
00143 ANNOUCEMENT: Castor 0.9.3.9 is now available Arnaud Blandin 2001-12-13 02:51
00133 Re: [xml-dev] A question about a complex type Sergey Beryozkin 2001-12-13 09:58
00148 Nasty XPath expressions Kelvin Yeow 2001-12-13 10:41
00130 [OT] Test Leigh Dodds 2001-12-13 13:42
00088 Re: [xml-dev] Nasty XPath expressions bob mcwhirter 2001-12-13 13:49
00097 Re: [xml-dev] Nasty XPath expressions Evan Lenz 2001-12-13 15:07
00144 RE: [xml-dev] Nasty XPath expressions Ramin Firoozye 2001-12-13 15:18
00132 First XML-1.1 Working Draft publicly available Daniel Veillard 2001-12-13 15:35
00136 Schema Article Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2001-12-13 15:57
00141 Displaying Dynamic Text bob roman 2001-12-13 16:15
00098 RE: [xml-dev] Nasty XPath expressions Michael Kay 2001-12-13 16:27
00071 ANN: Markup Object Events (MOE) Simon St.Laurent 2001-12-13 16:36
00087 Re: [xml-dev] Nasty XPath expressions Daniel Veillard 2001-12-13 17:06
00102 Re: [xml-dev] Nasty XPath expressions Amy Lewis 2001-12-13 17:17
00084 Re: [xml-dev] Nasty XPath expressions David Carlisle 2001-12-13 17:35
00128 XPath node-set order Amy Lewis 2001-12-13 18:32
00109 Re: [xml-dev] XPath node-set order bob mcwhirter 2001-12-13 18:39
00056 XML for IDL? Eric L. Winter 2001-12-13 18:41
00070 Re: [xml-dev] XPath node-set order Evan Lenz 2001-12-13 19:09
00054 RE: [xml-dev] Nasty XPath expressions Michael Kay 2001-12-13 19:18
00112 Re: [xml-dev] XPath node-set order David Carlisle 2001-12-13 20:05
00125 Adding attributes in MSXML Venkatesh Babu 2001-12-13 20:16
00114 RE: [xml-dev] First XML-1.1 Working Draft publicly available Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2001-12-13 20:35
00122 RE: [xml-dev] First XML-1.1 Working Draft publicly available Steven Noels 2001-12-13 20:48
00205 Re: [xml-dev] Converting XML to RTF [email protected] 2001-12-13 21:21
00219 RE: [xml-dev] Nasty XPath expressions Michael Kay 2001-12-13 22:45
00176 RE: [xml-dev] First XML-1.1 Working Draft publicly available Michael Kay 2001-12-13 23:04
00161 effective use of DOM Jeffrey I Condon 2001-12-13 23:12
00162 Re: [xml-dev] First XML-1.1 Working Draft publicly available Daniel Veillard 2001-12-13 23:16
00175 Re: [xml-dev] First XML-1.1 Working Draft publicly available Gavin Thomas Nicol 2001-12-14 00:00
00220 RE: [xml-dev] Nasty XPath expressions Michael Brennan 2001-12-14 00:47
00203 RE: [xml-dev] First XML-1.1 Working Draft publicly available Michael Brennan 2001-12-14 00:57
00218 Re: [xml-dev] First XML-1.1 Working Draft publicly available David Brownell 2001-12-14 02:30
00207 Re: [xml-dev] Schema Article Eric van der Vlist 2001-12-14 04:41
00192 XML-1.1 -- just ignore it Rick Jelliffe 2001-12-14 08:44
00180 RE: [xml-dev] Nasty XPath expressions Michael Kay 2001-12-14 09:43
00240 A simle XSD question! Schweitzer Antal 2001-12-14 11:04
00249 word 2000 to xml Rahul Mahajan 2001-12-14 12:31
00250 RE: [xml-dev] word 2000 to xml Williams, Timothy W. 2001-12-14 13:00
00239 Re: [xml-dev] XML-1.1 -- just ignore it Eric van der Vlist 2001-12-14 13:25
00182 RE: [xml-dev] Nasty XPath expressions Christian Nentwich 2001-12-14 13:27
00178 Re: [xml-dev] First XML-1.1 Working Draft publicly available Eric van der Vlist 2001-12-14 13:47
00193 xpath mess case study: .net (was: Nasty XPath expressions) Christian Nentwich 2001-12-14 13:59
00195 Re: [xml-dev] Nasty XPath expressions Steve Muench 2001-12-14 14:42
00177 SS Scripting vs XSL jimtronic 2001-12-14 14:44
00251 Re: [xml-dev] Nasty XPath expressions Christian Nentwich 2001-12-14 14:54
00238 Re: [xml-dev] XML-1.1 -- just ignore it Richard Tobin 2001-12-14 15:20
00237 Re: [xml-dev] Converting XML to RTF Jonathan Perret 2001-12-14 15:40
00252 RE: [xml-dev] SS Scripting vs XSL [email protected] 2001-12-14 15:53
00179 RE: [xml-dev] SS Scripting vs XSL Dare Obasanjo 2001-12-14 15:58
00194 RE: [xml-dev] word 2000 to xml Max Dunn 2001-12-14 16:00
00190 ServerXMLHTTP and Foreign Languages [email protected] 2001-12-14 16:01
00216 RE: [xml-dev] parser maintains state? Wedinger, Keith 2001-12-14 16:17
00181 Re: [xml-dev] parser maintains state? Wendi Sisson 2001-12-14 16:19
00191 Re: [xml-dev] Nasty XPath expressions Dare Obasanjo 2001-12-14 16:42
00208 Re: [xml-dev] Nasty XPath expressions Francis Norton 2001-12-14 18:13
00163 Re: [xml-dev] SS Scripting vs XSL Francis Norton 2001-12-14 18:14
00174 Re: [xml-dev] XML-1.1 -- just ignore it Tim Bray 2001-12-14 18:29
00173 Re: [xml-dev] Nasty XPath expressions Dare Obasanjo 2001-12-14 18:52
00164 RE: [xml-dev] Nasty XPath expressions Joshua Allen 2001-12-14 19:08
00206 Re: [xml-dev] Nasty XPath expressions Jason Diamond 2001-12-14 19:13
00217 Re: [xml-dev] XML-1.1 -- just ignore it David Brownell 2001-12-14 19:48
00204 XML 1.0 (3rd Edition) (Was: XML-1.1 -- just ignore it) [email protected] 2001-12-14 19:52
00221 RE: [xml-dev] word 2000 to xml Britt, James 2001-12-14 21:25
00246 RE: [xml-dev] XML 1.0 (3rd Edition) (Was: XML-1.1 -- just ignore it) Champion, Mike 2001-12-14 21:38
00167 The Wheels Are Grinding (Was RE: [xml-dev] XML 1.0 (3rd Edition) (Was: XML-1.1 -- just ignore it)) Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2001-12-14 22:20
00183 Re: [xml-dev] XML 1.0 (3rd Edition) (Was: XML-1.1 -- just ignore it) Richard Tobin 2001-12-14 23:26
00201 RE: [xml-dev] Nasty XPath expressions Joshua Allen 2001-12-14 23:30
00200 Question Nelson Marisco 2001-12-15 00:14
00185 Some comments on the 1.1 draft Tim Bray 2001-12-15 01:02
00229 Another Unicode nit Tim Bray 2001-12-15 01:07
00231 Re: [xml-dev] Nasty XPath expressions Dare Obasanjo 2001-12-15 01:27
00247 RE: [xml-dev] Question Max Dunn 2001-12-15 01:50
00234 Re: [xml-dev] XML-1.1 -- just ignore it Gavin Thomas Nicol 2001-12-15 02:15
00245 XML and mainframes, yet again (was RE: [xml-dev] Some comments on the 1.1 draft) Champion, Mike 2001-12-15 02:57
00158 [xml-dev] Nasty XPath expressions Kelvin Yeow 2001-12-15 09:53
00223 Re: [xml-dev] XML and mainframes, yet again (was RE: [xml-dev] Some comments on the 1.1 draft) Elliotte Rusty Harold 2001-12-15 13:08
00215 RE: [xml-dev] XML and mainframes, yet again (was RE: [xml-dev] So me comments on the 1.1 draft) Champion, Mike 2001-12-15 15:42
00213 Some thoughts about the compatibility between XML 1.0 and XML 1.1 Eric van der Vlist 2001-12-15 16:48
00224 Re: [xml-dev] XML and mainframes, yet again David Brownell 2001-12-15 19:32
00166 RE: [xml-dev] Displaying Dynamic Text Dharmesh Shah 2001-12-15 20:14
00160 RE: [xml-dev] Dynamic XML structure from XML Schema at runtime Dharmesh Shah 2001-12-15 20:22
00155 Re: [xml-dev] XML-1.1 -- just ignore it David Brownell 2001-12-15 21:36
00168 Re: [xml-dev] XML and mainframes, yet again (was RE: [xml-dev] Some comments on the 1.1 draft) David Carlisle 2001-12-15 21:43
00172 Re: [xml-dev] XML and mainframes, yet again (was RE: [xml-dev] So me comments on the 1.1 draft) David Carlisle 2001-12-15 21:56
00153 RE: [xml-dev] Question Michael Kay 2001-12-15 23:32
00211 RE: [xml-dev] XML and mainframes, yet again (was RE: [xml-dev] Some comments on the 1.1 draft) Michael Kay 2001-12-15 23:54
00227 Re: [xml-dev] XML and mainframes, yet again (was RE: [xml-dev] Some comments on the 1.1 draft) Rick Jelliffe 2001-12-16 00:48
00226 RE: [xml-dev] XML and mainframes, yet again (was RE: [xml-dev] So me comments on the 1.1 draft) Champion, Mike 2001-12-16 00:57
00169 Re: [xml-dev] Suggestion for an alternative XML 1.1 Elliotte Rusty Harold 2001-12-16 01:47
00210 Suggestion for an alternative XML 1.1 Rick Jelliffe 2001-12-16 02:02
00165 Re: [xml-dev] XML-1.1 -- just ignore it Gavin Thomas Nicol 2001-12-16 02:18
00242 Re: [xml-dev] XML and mainframes, yet again (was RE: [xml-dev] Some comments on the 1.1 draft) Rick Jelliffe 2001-12-16 02:19
00235 Re: [xml-dev] XML and mainframes, yet again (was RE: [xml-dev] Some comments on the 1.1 draft) Gavin Thomas Nicol 2001-12-16 02:20
00159 RE: [xml-dev] Suggestion for an alternative XML 1.1 Champion, Mike 2001-12-16 03:05
00157 RE: [xml-dev] XML and mainframes, yet again (was RE: [xml-dev] So me comments on the 1.1 draft) Simon St.Laurent 2001-12-16 03:24
00199 XMLSchema to Oracle Schema Charlot Agius 2001-12-16 10:23
00186 RE: [xml-dev] XML and mainframes, yet again (was RE: [xml-dev] So me comments on the 1.1 draft) Elliotte Rusty Harold 2001-12-16 14:48
00189 RE: [xml-dev] Dynamic XML structure from XML Schema at runtime Al Snell 2001-12-16 16:54
00196 Re: [xml-dev] XMLSchema to Oracle Schema Steve Muench 2001-12-16 17:41
00243 RE: [xml-dev] XML and mainframes, yet again (was RE: [xml-dev] So me comments on the 1.1 draft) Champion, Mike 2001-12-16 18:18
00233 Version numbering, requirements Amy Lewis 2001-12-16 18:42
00230 Re: [xml-dev] XML and mainframes, yet again Tim Bray 2001-12-16 18:49
00248 RE: [xml-dev] XML and mainframes, yet again Tim Bray 2001-12-16 18:57
00188 ANN: New book on XML Schema Priscilla Walmsley 2001-12-16 19:09
00197 Re: [xml-dev] Nasty XPath expressions Francis Norton 2001-12-16 21:18
00244 Re: [xml-dev] Nasty XPath expressions Francis Norton 2001-12-16 21:21
00232 RE: [xml-dev] XML and mainframes, yet again Champion, Mike 2001-12-16 22:50
00236 RE: [xml-dev] XML and mainframes, yet again Elliotte Rusty Harold 2001-12-16 23:21
00241 Re: [xml-dev] Some comments on the 1.1 draft Richard Tobin 2001-12-17 00:35
00198 Re: [xml-dev] XML-1.1 -- just ignore it Richard Tobin 2001-12-17 00:38
00187 Re: [xml-dev] XML-1.1 -- just ignore it David Brownell 2001-12-17 00:42
00202 Re: [xml-dev] XML and mainframes, yet again (was RE: [xml-dev] So Richard Tobin 2001-12-17 00:44
00184 RE: [xml-dev] Displaying Dynamic Text Alison Anderson 2001-12-17 01:03
00228 Re: [xml-dev] Suggestion for an alternative XML 1.1 John Cowan 2001-12-17 01:16
00225 Re: [xml-dev] Suggestion for an alternative XML 1.1 Elliotte Rusty Harold 2001-12-17 01:26
00214 Re: [xml-dev] XML and mainframes, yet again (was RE: [xml-dev] So me comments on the 1.1 draft) Elliotte Rusty Harold 2001-12-17 01:35
00209 Re: [xml-dev] XML and mainframes, yet again (was RE: [xml-dev] So me comments on the 1.1 draft) John Cowan 2001-12-17 01:49
00156 terra incognita Simon St.Laurent 2001-12-17 01:58
00170 Re: [xml-dev] Version numbering, requirements John Cowan 2001-12-17 02:02
00171 Re: [xml-dev] XML and mainframes, yet again (was RE: [xml-dev] Some comments on the 1.1 draft) John Cowan 2001-12-17 02:28
00154 Re: [xml-dev] XML and mainframes, yet again (was RE: [xml-dev] Some comments on the 1.1 draft) John Cowan 2001-12-17 02:29
00212 Re: [xml-dev] XML and mainframes, yet again (was RE: [xml-dev] So me comments on the 1.1 draft) John Cowan 2001-12-17 02:39
00222 Re: [xml-dev] XML and mainframes, yet again John Cowan 2001-12-17 02:45
00305 Re: [xml-dev] XML and mainframes, yet again John Cowan 2001-12-17 02:46
00319 Re: [xml-dev] XML and mainframes, yet again John Cowan 2001-12-17 02:48
00276 Re: [xml-dev] XML and mainframes, yet again (was RE: [xml-dev] Some comments on the 1.1 draft) John Cowan 2001-12-17 02:50
00261 Re: [xml-dev] Suggestion for an alternative XML 1.1 John Cowan 2001-12-17 02:55
00262 Re: [xml-dev] XML and mainframes, yet again (was RE: [xml-dev] So me comments on the 1.1 draft) John Cowan 2001-12-17 02:58
00275 [xml-dev] OT: Research Survey on Content-Driven Applications Leonor Ciarlone 2001-12-17 04:22
00320 RE: [xml-dev] terra incognita Champion, Mike 2001-12-17 04:25
00318 Re: [xml-dev] terra incognita Tim Bray 2001-12-17 05:03
00303 Re: [xml-dev] terra incognita Jonathan Borden 2001-12-17 05:16
00307 Re: [xml-dev] XML-1.1 -- just ignore it Gavin Thomas Nicol 2001-12-17 06:31
00349 Re: [xml-dev] terra incognita Gavin Thomas Nicol 2001-12-17 06:51
00292 Exception in parseCLOB procedure. Neeraja Divakaruni 2001-12-17 06:51
00340 5-byte UTF-8 encoding not supported Neeraja Divakaruni 2001-12-17 06:53
00350 Re: [xml-dev] terra incognita Gavin Thomas Nicol 2001-12-17 07:04
00339 Re: [xml-dev] 5-byte UTF-8 encoding not supported Christopher R. Maden 2001-12-17 07:31
00282 Re: [xml-dev] terra incognita W. E. Perry 2001-12-17 08:01
00291 Re: [xml-dev] terra incognita Eric van der Vlist 2001-12-17 08:57
00278 RE: [xml-dev] Some comments on the 1.1 draft Michael Kay 2001-12-17 08:57
00293 RE: [xml-dev] terra incognita Michael Kay 2001-12-17 09:24
00277 RE: [xml-dev] Exception in parseCLOB procedure. Michael Kay 2001-12-17 09:28
00280 Re: [xml-dev] terra incognita Dare Obasanjo 2001-12-17 09:57
00295 Re: [xml-dev] 5-byte UTF-8 encoding not supported Neeraja Divakaruni 2001-12-17 10:06
00351 Re: [xml-dev] XML and mainframes, yet again (was RE: [xml-dev] So me comments on the 1.1 draft) David Carlisle 2001-12-17 10:20
00338 Re: [xml-dev] XML and mainframes, yet again (was RE: [xml-dev] So David Carlisle 2001-12-17 10:31
00337 Re: [xml-dev] XML and mainframes, yet again (was RE: [xml-dev] Some comments on the 1.1 draft) David Carlisle 2001-12-17 10:37
00352 RE: [xml-dev] XML and mainframes, yet again (was RE: [xml-dev] So me comments on the 1.1 draft) Nicolas LEHUEN 2001-12-17 10:52
00294 Re: [xml-dev] XML and mainframes, yet again (was RE: [xml-dev] So me comments on the 1.1 draft) John Cowan 2001-12-17 10:58
00279 Re: [xml-dev] XML and mainframes, yet again (was RE: [xml-dev] So me comments on the 1.1 draft) John Cowan 2001-12-17 10:59
00290 RE: [xml-dev] terra incognita Leigh Dodds 2001-12-17 11:15
00281 Re: [xml-dev] 5-byte UTF-8 encoding not supported Christopher R. Maden 2001-12-17 11:24
00274 Re: [xml-dev] Suggestion for an alternative XML 1.1 Elliotte Rusty Harold 2001-12-17 12:13
00316 RE: [xml-dev] Where have the element types gone? Sean McGrath 2001-12-17 12:37
00308 DTD problem Paul Johnston 2001-12-17 12:51
00263 Re: [xml-dev] XML and mainframes, yet again (was RE: [xml-dev] So me comments on the 1.1 draft) David Carlisle 2001-12-17 13:42
00273 OASIS TC Call For Participation: XML Localisation Interchange File Format TC Karl F. Best 2001-12-17 14:28
00264 REMINDER: OASIS TC Call For Participation: Web Services Component Model TC Karl F. Best 2001-12-17 14:31
00306 Re: [xml-dev] terra incognita Joe English 2001-12-17 16:33
00317 Re: [xml-dev] terra incognita Clark C . Evans 2001-12-17 16:52
00321 Re: [xml-dev] XML and mainframes, yet again (was RE: [xml-dev] So me comments on the 1.1 draft) David Brownell 2001-12-17 19:20
00304 RE: [xml-dev] Some comments on the 1.1 draft Joshua Allen 2001-12-17 19:21
00346 RE: [xml-dev] Some comments on the 1.1 draft Julian Reschke 2001-12-17 19:26
00331 Re: [xml-dev] XML and mainframes, yet again David Brownell 2001-12-17 19:30
00283 Re: [xml-dev] XML and mainframes, yet again Richard Tobin 2001-12-17 19:50
00301 RE: [xml-dev] terra incognita Ramin Firoozye 2001-12-17 20:00
00300 Re: [xml-dev] XML and mainframes, yet again John Cowan 2001-12-17 20:02
00285 Regex for XPath schema type? Amy Lewis 2001-12-17 20:03
00329 RE: [xml-dev] terra incognita Jeff Lowery 2001-12-17 21:05
00334 Re: [xml-dev] terra incognita Gavin Thomas Nicol 2001-12-17 21:45
00347 XML Validation Tool using MS XML 4 Badri Lakshmiraghavan 2001-12-17 21:58
00345 DESIGN PROPOSAL: Java XMLIterator John Cowan 2001-12-17 22:11
00267 Re: [xml-dev] terra incognita Eric van der Vlist 2001-12-17 22:21
00323 Re: [xml-dev] XML Validation Tool using MS XML 4 Jim Akiba 2001-12-17 22:23
00258 URI for class names and native data types Clark C . Evans 2001-12-17 22:35
00313 Re: [xml-dev] DESIGN PROPOSAL: Java XMLIterator John Cowan 2001-12-17 22:41
00324 RE: [xml-dev] XML Validation Tool using MS XML 4 Joshua Allen 2001-12-17 22:44
00315 Re: [xml-dev] DESIGN PROPOSAL: Java XMLIterator Clark C . Evans 2001-12-17 22:46
00266 RE: [xml-dev] XML Validation Tool using MS XML 4 Stephen Statkus 2001-12-17 22:48
00260 Re: [xml-dev] DESIGN PROPOSAL: Java XMLIterator Clark C . Evans 2001-12-17 23:02
00268 Re: [xml-dev] DESIGN PROPOSAL: Java XMLIterator Clark C . Evans 2001-12-17 23:17
00255 RE: [xml-dev] DESIGN PROPOSAL: Java XMLIterator Steven Noels 2001-12-17 23:20
00272 RE: [xml-dev] XML Validation Tool using MS XML 4 Badri Lakshmiraghavan 2001-12-17 23:25
00253 Re: [xml-dev] DESIGN PROPOSAL: Java XMLIterator Clark C . Evans 2001-12-17 23:41
00311 Re: [xml-dev] DTD problem Ronald Bourret 2001-12-18 00:03
00326 RE: [xml-dev] DESIGN PROPOSAL: Java XMLIterator Jeff Lowery 2001-12-18 01:10
00327 Re: [xml-dev] Some comments on the 1.1 draft David Brownell 2001-12-18 01:35
00310 Beauty and markup (was Re: terra incognita) Evan Lenz 2001-12-18 02:08
00257 Re: [xml-dev] DTD problem David Brownell 2001-12-18 04:11
00269 Re: [xml-dev] Beauty and markup (was Re: terra incognita) Jeff Rafter 2001-12-18 04:50
00259 Re: [xml-dev] DESIGN PROPOSAL: Java XMLIterator James Clark 2001-12-18 05:34
00335 Re: [xml-dev] terra incognita Gavin Thomas Nicol 2001-12-18 06:46
00265 Re: [xml-dev] terra incognita David Brownell 2001-12-18 06:50
00342 Re: [xml-dev] terra incognita David Brownell 2001-12-18 07:04
00299 RE: [xml-dev] Beauty and markup (was Re: terra incognita) Evan D. Lenz 2001-12-18 08:46
00286 Re: [xml-dev] DESIGN PROPOSAL: Java XMLIterator Rob Lugt 2001-12-18 10:39
00289 Re: [xml-dev] DESIGN PROPOSAL: Java XMLIterator Rob Lugt 2001-12-18 10:52
00296 Re: [xml-dev] DESIGN PROPOSAL: Java XMLIterator John Cowan 2001-12-18 11:36
00343 RE: [xml-dev] DTD problem Paul Johnston 2001-12-18 11:45
00333 Re: [xml-dev] DESIGN PROPOSAL: Java XMLIterator James Clark 2001-12-18 12:01
00348 Re: [xml-dev] DESIGN PROPOSAL: Java XMLIterator Sean McGrath 2001-12-18 12:12
00330 RE: [xml-dev] DTD problem Paul Johnston 2001-12-18 12:37
00288 Re: [xml-dev] DESIGN PROPOSAL: Java XMLIterator Elliotte Rusty Harold 2001-12-18 12:45
00297 RE: [xml-dev] URI for class names and native data types Leigh Dodds 2001-12-18 13:15
00344 Re: pullax licence and XmlInputSource [was DESIGN PROPOSAL: Java XMLIterator] Rob Lugt 2001-12-18 13:25
00332 Re: [xml-dev] DTD problem Ronald Bourret 2001-12-18 13:32
00336 SPKI-XML Certificate Structure Xavier Orri 2001-12-18 14:20
00298 RE: [xml-dev] URI for class names and native data types Julian Reschke 2001-12-18 14:47
00302 s-expressions and XML was Re: [xml-dev] terra incognita Jonathan Borden 2001-12-18 14:48
00341 Re: [xml-dev] URI for class names and native data types Clark C . Evans 2001-12-18 14:51
00328 RE: [xml-dev] URI for class names and native data types Nicolas LEHUEN 2001-12-18 14:58
00309 Re: [xml-dev] URI for class names and native data types Fred L. Drake, Jr. 2001-12-18 15:02
00284 Re: [xml-dev] DESIGN PROPOSAL: Java XMLIterator Clark C . Evans 2001-12-18 15:06
00392 Re[2]: [xml-dev] XML Validation Tool using MS XML 4 Kevin Burges 2001-12-18 15:12
00256 Re: [xml-dev] URI for class names and native data types Clark C . Evans 2001-12-18 15:17
00270 RE: [xml-dev] s-expressions and XML was Re: [xml-dev] terra incog nita Champion, Mike 2001-12-18 15:26
00271 Impact of Various Features on W3C Schema Design CHIUSANO, Joseph 2001-12-18 16:22
00312 RE: [xml-dev] Impact of Various Features on W3C Schema Design CHIUSANO, Joseph 2001-12-18 16:26
00325 Re: [xml-dev] Impact of Various Features on W3C Schema Design Francis Norton 2001-12-18 17:20
00254 Deadline extended for XML Europe paper submissions! Elledge, Marion 2001-12-18 17:31
00314 RE: [xml-dev] DESIGN PROPOSAL: Java XMLIterator Chris Fry 2001-12-18 17:45
00287 Re: [xml-dev] URI for class names and native data types Dare Obasanjo 2001-12-18 17:52
00322 Re: [xml-dev] s-expressions and XML was Re: [xml-dev] terra incognita Bill Lindsey 2001-12-18 18:07
00405 RE: [xml-dev] Impact of Various Features on W3C Schema Design Jeff Lowery 2001-12-18 18:45
00376 XTC Project HIRAUCHI Hideyuki 2001-12-18 19:06
00419 XML Stream in C++ Pijcke Christophe 2001-12-18 19:06
00362 Re: [xml-dev] s-expressions and XML was Re: [xml-dev] terra incognita Gavin Thomas Nicol 2001-12-18 19:15
00361 Re: s-expressions and XML was Re: [xml-dev] terra incognita David Brownell 2001-12-18 19:26
00375 RE: [xml-dev] s-expressions and XML was Re: [xml-dev] terra incog nita Jeff Lowery 2001-12-18 19:35
00420 Re: [xml-dev] XML-1.1 -- just ignore it David Brownell 2001-12-18 19:51
00403 WebSphere tool development trial version - heavy on XML Jeffrey I Condon 2001-12-18 20:31
00418 RE: [xml-dev] s-expressions and XML was Re: [xml-dev] terra incog nita Michael Brennan 2001-12-18 21:12
00407 Re: [xml-dev] XML-1.1 -- just ignore it Gavin Thomas Nicol 2001-12-18 21:38
00380 RE: [xml-dev] Some comments on the 1.1 draft Michael Rys 2001-12-19 00:54
00440 Re: [xml-dev] Some comments on the 1.1 draft Alan Kent 2001-12-19 01:08
00449 Re: [xml-dev] Some comments on the 1.1 draft Gavin Thomas Nicol 2001-12-19 01:15
00450 RE: [xml-dev] Some comments on the 1.1 draft Michael Rys 2001-12-19 01:36
00439 Re: [xml-dev] Some comments on the 1.1 draft Gavin Thomas Nicol 2001-12-19 04:59
00382 Namespace Usage Question Clark C . Evans 2001-12-19 05:40
00378 convertin XML to RTF using java api Selvamani 2001-12-19 05:47
00391 Re: [xml-dev] Suggestion for an alternative XML 1.1 Rick Jelliffe 2001-12-19 05:48
00393 Re: [xml-dev] terra incognita Rick Jelliffe 2001-12-19 06:11
00377 Re: [xml-dev] XML Validation Tool using MS XML 4 Rick Jelliffe 2001-12-19 06:38
00395 Re: [xml-dev] terra incognita Paul T 2001-12-19 06:50
00451 Re: [xml-dev] Some comments on the 1.1 draft Rick Jelliffe 2001-12-19 07:02
00437 Re: [xml-dev] Some comments on the 1.1 draft Alan Kent 2001-12-19 07:24
00452 Re: [xml-dev] terra incognita Alan Kent 2001-12-19 07:53
00394 RE: [xml-dev] Some comments on the 1.1 draft Julian Reschke 2001-12-19 08:07
00390 RE: [xml-dev] Some comments on the 1.1 draft Michael Kay 2001-12-19 09:31
00379 hierarchy Fabien Roy 2001-12-19 09:33
00408 RE: [xml-dev] Some comments on the 1.1 draft Michael Kay 2001-12-19 09:54
00381 Re: [xml-dev] Some comments on the 1.1 draft Rick Jelliffe 2001-12-19 09:56
00416 Re: [xml-dev] Some comments on the 1.1 draft Rick Jelliffe 2001-12-19 09:59
00363 RE: [xml-dev] Some comments on the 1.1 draft Julian Reschke 2001-12-19 10:06
00438 Re: [xml-dev] terra incognita Dare Obasanjo 2001-12-19 10:16
00374 Re: [xml-dev] XML Validation Tool using MS XML 4 Oleg Tkachenko 2001-12-19 10:22
00373 Re: [xml-dev] Some comments on the 1.1 draft Alan Kent 2001-12-19 10:24
00364 Re: [xml-dev] terra incognita Paul T 2001-12-19 10:32
00431 Re: [xml-dev] XML Stream in C++ Pete Kirkham 2001-12-19 10:37
00406 Re: [xml-dev] Some comments on the 1.1 draft John Cowan 2001-12-19 10:43
00404 Re: [xml-dev] Some comments on the 1.1 draft Eric van der Vlist 2001-12-19 10:46
00421 Re: [xml-dev] Suggestion for an alternative XML 1.1 John Cowan 2001-12-19 10:47
00446 RE: [xml-dev] Some comments on the 1.1 draft Julian Reschke 2001-12-19 10:53
00417 Re: [xml-dev] Some comments on the 1.1 draft Rick Jelliffe 2001-12-19 10:53
00383 Re: [xml-dev] Some comments on the 1.1 draft John Cowan 2001-12-19 11:10
00401 Re: [xml-dev] Suggestion for an alternative XML 1.1 Richard Tobin 2001-12-19 11:20
00400 Re: [xml-dev] Suggestion for an alternative XML 1.1 Richard Tobin 2001-12-19 11:26
00385 Re: [xml-dev] Namespace Usage Question Richard Tobin 2001-12-19 11:34
00429 Re: [xml-dev] Namespace Usage Question Clark C . Evans 2001-12-19 12:05
00447 Re: [xml-dev] Namespace Usage Question David Carlisle 2001-12-19 12:22
00434 Graphotron - XPath based generation of graphs from XML documents Miloslav Nic 2001-12-19 12:49
00445 Re: [xml-dev] Namespace Usage Question Richard Tobin 2001-12-19 13:15
00358 Re: [xml-dev] Suggestion for an alternative XML 1.1 Elliotte Rusty Harold 2001-12-19 13:44
00367 Re: [xml-dev] terra incognita Elliotte Rusty Harold 2001-12-19 14:06
00415 Re: [xml-dev] Some comments on the 1.1 draft MURATA Makoto 2001-12-19 16:17
00413 Re: [xml-dev] terra incognita Mike Rawlins 2001-12-19 16:23
00424 Re: [xml-dev] Some comments on the 1.1 draft David Brownell 2001-12-19 16:25
00366 Re: [xml-dev] terra incognita Gavin Thomas Nicol 2001-12-19 16:33
00360 Re: [xml-dev] Some comments on the 1.1 draft Gavin Thomas Nicol 2001-12-19 16:35
00368 Re: [xml-dev] Some comments on the 1.1 draft Gavin Thomas Nicol 2001-12-19 16:42
00355 Re: [xml-dev] terra incognita Gavin Thomas Nicol 2001-12-19 16:43
00372 Re: [xml-dev] Some comments on the 1.1 draft Gavin Thomas Nicol 2001-12-19 16:45
00353 Re: [xml-dev] Some comments on the 1.1 draft Gavin Thomas Nicol 2001-12-19 16:52
00426 Re: [xml-dev] Some comments on the 1.1 draft Gavin Thomas Nicol 2001-12-19 16:59
00411 Re: [xml-dev] terra incognita Al Snell 2001-12-19 17:08
00427 RE: [xml-dev] terra incognita Champion, Mike 2001-12-19 17:15
00357 Re: [xml-dev] terra incognita Gavin Thomas Nicol 2001-12-19 17:21
00410 RE: [xml-dev] Some comments on the 1.1 draft J C Theriot 2001-12-19 17:29
00369 Re: [xml-dev] terra incognita Gavin Thomas Nicol 2001-12-19 17:33
00365 Re: [xml-dev] Some comments on the 1.1 draft Gavin Thomas Nicol 2001-12-19 17:37
00399 Re: [xml-dev] Some comments on the 1.1 draft Gavin Thomas Nicol 2001-12-19 17:47
00359 Re: [xml-dev] Some comments on the 1.1 draft Eric van der Vlist 2001-12-19 17:52
00435 Re: [xml-dev] terra incognita Paul T 2001-12-19 17:56
00442 Fat Albert's Theorem (foremerly RE: [xml-dev] terra incognita) Ramin Firoozye 2001-12-19 18:00
00443 Re: [xml-dev] terra incognita Gavin Thomas Nicol 2001-12-19 18:06
00386 RE: [xml-dev] Some comments on the 1.1 draft Michael Rys 2001-12-19 18:14
00389 RE: [xml-dev] Some comments on the 1.1 draft Michael Rys 2001-12-19 18:14
00396 RE: [xml-dev] Some comments on the 1.1 draft Michael Rys 2001-12-19 18:14
00430 Re: [xml-dev] Some comments on the 1.1 draft Gavin Thomas Nicol 2001-12-19 18:15
00433 Re: [xml-dev] Some comments on the 1.1 draft John Cowan 2001-12-19 18:24
00448 RE: [xml-dev] terra incognita Champion, Mike 2001-12-19 18:28
00388 Re: [xml-dev] Some comments on the 1.1 draft Eric van der Vlist 2001-12-19 18:40
00397 Re: [xml-dev] Some comments on the 1.1 draft John Cowan 2001-12-19 18:41
00423 Re: [xml-dev] terra incognita Dare Obasanjo 2001-12-19 19:12
00444 RE: [xml-dev] Suggestion for an alternative XML 1.1 Joshua Allen 2001-12-19 19:18
00432 RE: [xml-dev] Suggestion for an alternative XML 1.1 Joshua Allen 2001-12-19 19:28
00436 RE: [xml-dev] Some comments on the 1.1 draft Julian Reschke 2001-12-19 19:36
00441 RE: [xml-dev] terra incognita Jeff Lowery 2001-12-19 19:45
00398 RE: [xml-dev] Some comments on the 1.1 draft Julian Reschke 2001-12-19 19:47
00387 Re: [xml-dev] Some comments on the 1.1 draft Jonathan Borden 2001-12-19 20:19
00402 Re: [xml-dev] Some comments on the 1.1 draft Eric van der Vlist 2001-12-19 20:37
00384 Re: [xml-dev] Some comments on the 1.1 draft Jonathan Borden 2001-12-19 20:57
00428 Re: [xml-dev] Some comments on the 1.1 draft Gavin Thomas Nicol 2001-12-19 21:08
00409 Re: [xml-dev] Some comments on the 1.1 draft Gavin Thomas Nicol 2001-12-19 21:12
00370 Re: [xml-dev] terra incognita Gavin Thomas Nicol 2001-12-19 21:42
00356 RE: [xml-dev] terra incognita Al Snell 2001-12-19 21:49
00371 Re: [xml-dev] Some comments on the 1.1 draft Gavin Thomas Nicol 2001-12-19 21:52
00354 Re: [xml-dev] terra incognita Paul T 2001-12-19 22:11
00412 Re: [xml-dev] Some comments on the 1.1 draft Alan Kent 2001-12-19 22:38
00414 Re: [xml-dev] Some comments on the 1.1 draft Elliotte Rusty Harold 2001-12-19 23:12
00425 Re: [xml-dev] Some comments on the 1.1 draft Alan Kent 2001-12-19 23:15
00422 Re: [xml-dev] Some comments on the 1.1 draft Richard Tobin 2001-12-19 23:33
00519 Re: [xml-dev] terra incognita K. Ari Krupnikov 2001-12-19 23:33
00505 Re: [xml-dev] Some comments on the 1.1 draft MURATA Makoto 2001-12-19 23:39
00461 Re: [xml-dev] XML and mainframes, yet again K. Ari Krupnikov 2001-12-20 00:01
00476 Re: [xml-dev] Some comments on the 1.1 draft MURATA Makoto 2001-12-20 00:03
00475 RE: [xml-dev] XML and mainframes, yet again Michael Brennan 2001-12-20 00:08
00462 RE: [xml-dev] terra incognita Derek Denny-Brown 2001-12-20 00:13
00520 Re: [xml-dev] Some comments on the 1.1 draft Michael Rys 2001-12-20 01:59
00503 Re: [xml-dev] terra incognita Rick Jelliffe 2001-12-20 02:19
00518 Re: [xml-dev] Some comments on the 1.1 draft Rick Jelliffe 2001-12-20 02:39
00507 RE: [xml-dev] Some comments on the 1.1 draft Michael Rys 2001-12-20 02:53
00492 Why would MS want to make XML break on UNIX, Perl, Python, etc ? Rick Jelliffe 2001-12-20 04:54
00540 Re: [xml-dev] XML and mainframes, yet again (was RE: [xml-dev] Some comments on the 1.1 draft) K. Ari Krupnikov 2001-12-20 05:04
00549 Re: [xml-dev] Why would MS want to make XML break on UNIX, Perl, Python, etc ? Alan Kent 2001-12-20 05:09
00550 Supporting Unicode (was Some comments on the 1.1 draft) Rick Jelliffe 2001-12-20 05:22
00482 Re: [xml-dev] Why would MS want to make XML break on UNIX, Perl, Python, etc ? K. Ari Krupnikov 2001-12-20 05:37
00539 Re: [xml-dev] Why would MS want to make XML break on UNIX, Perl, Python, etc ? Rick Jelliffe 2001-12-20 05:46
00491 RE: [xml-dev] Supporting Unicode (was Some comments on the 1.1 dr aft) Rob Griffin 2001-12-20 05:59
00493 Re: [xml-dev] Supporting Unicode (was Some comments on the 1.1 dr aft) Alan Kent 2001-12-20 06:36
00478 Re: [xml-dev] Why would MS want to make XML break on UNIX, Perl, Python, etc ? Rick Jelliffe 2001-12-20 06:36
00477 Time to put SGML out to pasture? (was RE: [xml-dev] Why would MS want to make XML break on UNIX, Perl, Python, etc ?) Champion, Mike 2001-12-20 06:59
00495 Re: [xml-dev] Some comments on the 1.1 draft Mike Brown 2001-12-20 08:05
00551 Re: [xml-dev] Some comments on the 1.1 draft Daniel Veillard 2001-12-20 08:10
00480 Re: [xml-dev] Why would MS want to make XML break on UNIX, Perl, Python, etc ? Dare Obasanjo 2001-12-20 08:13
00538 Re: [xml-dev] XML and mainframes, yet again Ronald Bourret 2001-12-20 08:44
00504 RE: [xml-dev] Some comments on the 1.1 draft Michael Kay 2001-12-20 09:31
00537 Binary content and allowed characters in XML Nicolas LEHUEN 2001-12-20 09:34
00521 RE: [xml-dev] Suggestion for an alternative XML 1.1 Michael Kay 2001-12-20 09:38
00552 RE: [xml-dev] Some comments on the 1.1 draft Julian Reschke 2001-12-20 10:13
00494 embedded html [email protected] 2001-12-20 10:13
00546 RE: [xml-dev] Some comments on the 1.1 draft Michael Kay 2001-12-20 10:14
00531 RE: [xml-dev] XML and mainframes, yet again Michael Kay 2001-12-20 10:21
00479 RE: [xml-dev] Some comments on the 1.1 draft Julian Reschke 2001-12-20 10:27
00490 Re: [xml-dev] Why would MS want to make XML break on UNIX, Perl, Python, etc ? NUMATA Toshinori 2001-12-20 10:27
00516 RE: [xml-dev] embedded html [email protected] 2001-12-20 10:36
00481 Re: [xml-dev] Why would MS want to make XML break on UNIX, Perl, Python, etc ? John Cowan 2001-12-20 10:40
00508 Re: [xml-dev] Why would MS want to make XML break on UNIX, Perl, Python, etc ? John Cowan 2001-12-20 10:43
00474 RE: [xml-dev] embedded html [email protected] 2001-12-20 10:47
00463 RE: [xml-dev] embedded html Julian Reschke 2001-12-20 10:47
00473 Re: [xml-dev] Supporting Unicode (was Some comments on the 1.1 draft) John Cowan 2001-12-20 10:54
00464 RE: [xml-dev] embedded html Julian Reschke 2001-12-20 11:00
00517 RE: [xml-dev] embedded html [email protected] 2001-12-20 11:11
00506 Lexical vs value spaces (re: Binary content and allowed characters in XML) Eric van der Vlist 2001-12-20 11:14
00483 Re: [xml-dev] Lexical vs value spaces (re: Binary content and allowed characters in XML) John Cowan 2001-12-20 11:47
00501 Re: [xml-dev] Lexical vs value spaces (re: Binary content and allowed characters in XML) Eric van der Vlist 2001-12-20 12:26
00500 RE: [xml-dev] Lexical vs value spaces (re: Binary content and all owed characters in XML) Nicolas LEHUEN 2001-12-20 15:04
00485 Re: [xml-dev] Some comments on the 1.1 draft Gavin Thomas Nicol 2001-12-20 15:18
00529 Re: [xml-dev] Why would MS want to make XML break on UNIX, Perl, Python, etc ? Gavin Thomas Nicol 2001-12-20 15:28
00534 Re: [xml-dev] Supporting Unicode (was Some comments on the 1.1 dr aft) Gavin Thomas Nicol 2001-12-20 15:39
00515 Re: [xml-dev] Binary content and allowed characters in XML Gavin Thomas Nicol 2001-12-20 15:47
00547 Xpath/XSLT specific lists? Jim Akiba 2001-12-20 15:51
00545 Re: [xml-dev] Some comments on the 1.1 draft Richard Tobin 2001-12-20 15:58
00458 Re: [xml-dev] Xpath/XSLT specific lists? Sai N 2001-12-20 15:59
00466 Re: [xml-dev] Some comments on the 1.1 draft Gavin Thomas Nicol 2001-12-20 15:59
00467 RE: [xml-dev] Xpath/XSLT specific lists? Michael Kay 2001-12-20 16:00
00523 Re: [xml-dev] Why would MS want to make XML break on UNIX, Perl, Python, etc ? Joe English 2001-12-20 16:02
00513 RE: [xml-dev] Some comments on the 1.1 draft Champion, Mike 2001-12-20 16:04
00524 Re: [xml-dev] Why would MS want to make XML break on UNIX, Perl, Python, etc ? Joe English 2001-12-20 16:07
00460 Re: [xml-dev] Some comments on the 1.1 draft Gavin Thomas Nicol 2001-12-20 16:09
00468 Re: [xml-dev] Lexical vs value spaces (re: Binary content and allowed characters in XML) Gavin Thomas Nicol 2001-12-20 16:16
00453 Re: [xml-dev] Some comments on the 1.1 draft Gavin Thomas Nicol 2001-12-20 16:33
00455 Re: [xml-dev] Time to put SGML out to pasture? Joe English 2001-12-20 16:36
00526 Re: [xml-dev] Supporting Unicode Gavin Thomas Nicol 2001-12-20 16:39
00472 Supporting Unicode J C Theriot 2001-12-20 16:49
00511 Re: [xml-dev] Goodbye to textual applications? Andrew Kuchling 2001-12-20 16:53
00527 RE: [xml-dev] Supporting Unicode Nicolas LEHUEN 2001-12-20 17:01
00510 Re: [xml-dev] Goodbye to textual applications? Amy Lewis 2001-12-20 17:06
00469 The Internet Principle (was: Some comments on the 1.1 draft) John Cowan 2001-12-20 17:32
00459 RE: [xml-dev] Some comments on the 1.1 draft Julian Reschke 2001-12-20 17:57
00465 Re: [xml-dev] Goodbye to textual applications? John Cowan 2001-12-20 18:01
00535 Re: [xml-dev] Time to put SGML out to pasture? (was RE: [xml-dev] Why would MS want to make XML break on UNIX, Perl, Python, etc ?) John Cowan 2001-12-20 18:05
00457 Re: [xml-dev] Time to put SGML out to pasture? (was RE: [xml-dev] Why would MS want to make XML break on UNIX, Perl, Python, etc ?) Simon St.Laurent 2001-12-20 18:15
00499 Re: [xml-dev] Supporting Unicode Gavin Thomas Nicol 2001-12-20 18:28
00486 Re: The Internet Principle (was: Some comments on the 1.1 draft) Gavin Thomas Nicol 2001-12-20 18:31
00542 Re: [xml-dev] Some comments on the 1.1 draft Tim Bray 2001-12-20 18:36
00489 WebDAV (was Re: [xml-dev] Some comments on the 1.1 draft) Gavin Thomas Nicol 2001-12-20 18:41
00496 Re: [xml-dev] Some comments on the 1.1 draft Gavin Thomas Nicol 2001-12-20 18:43
00543 RE: [xml-dev] WebDAV (was Re: [xml-dev] Some comments on the 1.1 draft) Julian Reschke 2001-12-20 19:05
00533 Re: [xml-dev] WebDAV (was Re: [xml-dev] Some comments on the 1.1 draft) Gavin Thomas Nicol 2001-12-20 19:05
00548 RE: [xml-dev] WebDAV (was Re: [xml-dev] Some comments on the 1.1 draft) Julian Reschke 2001-12-20 19:27
00530 Re: [xml-dev] Lexical vs value spaces (re: Binary content and allowed characters in XML) Ronald Bourret 2001-12-20 20:13
00488 RE: [xml-dev] terra incognita Ramin Firoozye 2001-12-20 20:31
00497 Re: [xml-dev] Supporting Unicode (was Some comments on the 1.1 draft) Peter S. Housel 2001-12-20 20:58
00544 Re: [xml-dev] Goodbye to textual applications? Adam Turoff 2001-12-20 21:02
00532 Re: [xml-dev] Goodbye to textual applications? John Cowan 2001-12-20 21:17
00536 RE: [xml-dev] Why would MS want to make XML break on UNIX, Perl, Python, etc ? Michael Rys 2001-12-20 21:22
00541 RE: Why would MS want to make XML break on UNIX, Perl, Python, etc ? Derek Denny-Brown 2001-12-20 22:16
00502 Re: [xml-dev] Why would MS want to make XML break on UNIX, Perl, Python, etc ? Gavin Thomas Nicol 2001-12-20 22:42
00498 RE: [xml-dev] Supporting Unicode Rob Griffin 2001-12-20 22:52
00484 Xerces 2.0.0 - DocumentType.getInternalSubset() does it work?! Cirip Tomas 2001-12-20 22:52
00487 Recently published W3C Working Drafts Joe English 2001-12-20 22:58
00528 Re: [xml-dev] Goodbye to textual applications? Marcus Carr 2001-12-21 00:08
00509 Re: [xml-dev] Recently published W3C Working Drafts (long) Paul T 2001-12-21 00:16
00456 Re: [xml-dev] Xerces 2.0.0 - DocumentType.getInternalSubset() does it work?! Elena Litani 2001-12-21 00:32
00470 Re: [xml-dev] Time to put SGML out to pasture? (was RE: [xml-dev] Why would MS want to make XML break on UNIX, Perl, Python, etc ?) Marcus Carr 2001-12-21 00:37
00454 Re: [xml-dev] Recently published W3C Working Drafts (long) Joe English 2001-12-21 01:06
00471 Re: [xml-dev] Why would MS want to make XML break on UNIX, Perl, Python, etc ? Rick Jelliffe 2001-12-21 01:13
00512 Re: [xml-dev] Why would MS want to make XML break on UNIX, Perl, Python, etc ? Richard Tobin 2001-12-21 01:18
00525 Re: [xml-dev] Why would MS want to make XML break on UNIX, Perl, Python, etc ? Gavin Thomas Nicol 2001-12-21 02:17
00514 RE: [xml-dev] Namespace Usage Question Michael Brennan 2001-12-21 03:36
00522 RE: [xml-dev] Why would MS want to make XML break on UNIX, Perl, Python, etc ? Tim Bray 2001-12-21 04:52
00605 Re: [xml-dev] Why would MS want to make XML break on UNIX, Uche Ogbuji 2001-12-21 05:00
00619 Re: [xml-dev] Why would MS want to make XML break on UNIX, Perl, Python, etc ? Gavin Thomas Nicol 2001-12-21 05:50
00576 Re: [xml-dev] Some comments on the 1.1 draft Rick Jelliffe 2001-12-21 07:16
00561 Re: [xml-dev] Recently published W3C Working Drafts (long) Paul T 2001-12-21 07:40
00562 Re: [xml-dev] Why would MS want to make XML break on UNIX, Perl, Python, etc ? Rick Jelliffe 2001-12-21 08:38
00575 Re: [xml-dev] Why would MS want to make XML break on UNIX, Perl, Python, etc ? Rick Jelliffe 2001-12-21 08:58
00620 Re: [xml-dev] XML and mainframes, yet again K. Ari Krupnikov 2001-12-21 09:31
00615 RE: [xml-dev] Recently published W3C Working Drafts (long) Michael Kay 2001-12-21 09:54
00603 Re: [xml-dev] Goodbye to textual applications? Sean McGrath 2001-12-21 10:46
00618 Re: [xml-dev] Time to put SGML out to pasture? (was RE: [xml-dev] Why would MS want to make XML break on UNIX, Perl, Python, etc ?) Sean McGrath 2001-12-21 10:55
00607 Re: [xml-dev] Why would MS want to make XML break on UNIX, Perl, Python, etc ? John Cowan 2001-12-21 11:07
00592 Re: [xml-dev] Supporting Unicode John Cowan 2001-12-21 11:14
00580 Re: [xml-dev] Why would MS want to make XML break on UNIX, Perl, Python, etc ? Gavin Thomas Nicol 2001-12-21 12:10
00640 Re: [xml-dev] Goodbye to textual applications? Paul T 2001-12-21 12:29
00649 Re: [xml-dev] Goodbye to textual applications? Sean McGrath 2001-12-21 13:08
00650 Re: [xml-dev] Why would MS want to make XML break on UNIX, Perl, Python, etc ? Richard Tobin 2001-12-21 13:35
00639 Re: [xml-dev] Why would MS want to make XML break on UNIX, Perl, Python, etc ? Richard Tobin 2001-12-21 13:39
00582 Re: [xml-dev] Recently published W3C Working Drafts (long) Christian Nentwich 2001-12-21 14:04
00591 RE: [xml-dev] Why would MS want to make XML break on UNIX, Perl, Python, etc ? Champion, Mike 2001-12-21 14:13
00578 RE: [xml-dev] embedded html [email protected] 2001-12-21 15:32
00593 Re: [xml-dev] Some comments on the 1.1 draft John Cowan 2001-12-21 15:48
00577 Re: [xml-dev] Why would MS want to make XML break on UNIX, Perl, Python, etc ? Gavin Thomas Nicol 2001-12-21 17:24
00595 Re: [xml-dev] Why would MS want to make XML break on UNIX, Perl, Python, etc ? Gavin Thomas Nicol 2001-12-21 17:25
00637 Re: [xml-dev] Why would MS want to make XML break on UNIX, Perl, Python, etc ? Gavin Thomas Nicol 2001-12-21 17:38
00651 IBTWSH in RNG (was: Goodbye to textual applications?) John Cowan 2001-12-21 17:38
00638 Re: [xml-dev] Why would MS want to make XML break on UNIX, Perl, Python, etc ? John Cowan 2001-12-21 17:46
00652 Re: [xml-dev] Goodbye to textual applications? Paul T 2001-12-21 18:26
00594 Re: [xml-dev] Goodbye to textual applications? Joe English 2001-12-21 19:35
00579 RE: [xml-dev] Why would MS want to make XML break on UNIX, Perl, Python, etc ? Michael Fitzgerald 2001-12-21 19:44
00590 Re: [xml-dev] Goodbye to textual applications? Paul T 2001-12-21 21:44
00581 NULL in C (was RE: [xml-dev] Why would MS want to make XML break on UNIX, Perl, Python, etc ?) Michael Rys 2001-12-21 23:02
00616 Bounds Specification Sameet Nasnodkar 2001-12-21 23:03
00608 RE: [xml-dev] Recently published W3C Working Drafts (long) Michael Rys 2001-12-21 23:07
00573 XML & Java question... Cubeta, James 2001-12-21 23:12
00563 Re: [xml-dev] Bounds Specification K. Ari Krupnikov 2001-12-21 23:12
00574 RE: [xml-dev] Goodbye to textual applications? John Evdemon 2001-12-21 23:20
00564 XML, Java, & filters question... Cubeta, James 2001-12-21 23:43
00606 Re: [xml-dev] Why would MS want to make XML break on UNIX, Perl, Python, etc ? Richard Tobin 2001-12-22 00:03
00617 Re: [xml-dev] NULL in C (was RE: [xml-dev] Why would MS want to make XML break on UNIX, Perl, Python, etc ?) Richard Tobin 2001-12-22 00:07
00604 XML - XML Transformations Vanam, Ravindar 2001-12-22 00:09
00621 Announcement: W3C's five new XQuery/Xpath2 working drafts Massimo Marchiori 2001-12-22 01:20
00646 Re: [xml-dev] Goodbye to textual applications? Paul T 2001-12-22 02:23
00631 Re: [xml-dev] Recently published W3C Working Drafts (long) Joe English 2001-12-22 02:41
00601 Re: [xml-dev] Recently published W3C Working Drafts (long) Paul T 2001-12-22 03:26
00600 RE: [xml-dev] Recently published W3C Working Drafts (long) Michael Rys 2001-12-22 04:14
00585 Re: [xml-dev] Recently published W3C Working Drafts (long) Paul T 2001-12-22 05:16
00629 Re: [xml-dev] Why would MS want to make XML break on UNIX, Perl, Python, etc ? Gavin Thomas Nicol 2001-12-22 05:16
00583 Re: [xml-dev] Recently published W3C Working Drafts (long) Dare Obasanjo 2001-12-22 05:55
00647 RE: [xml-dev] Recently published W3C Working Drafts (long) Michael Rys 2001-12-22 07:09
00634 Re: [xml-dev] Recently published W3C Working Drafts (long) Paul T 2001-12-22 07:57
00645 Re: [xml-dev] XML, Java, & filters question... Niels Peter Strandberg 2001-12-22 12:45
00558 ANN: Gorille (alpha) Simon St.Laurent 2001-12-22 14:20
00613 RE: [xml-dev] Announcement: W3C's five new XQuery/Xpath2 working drafts Michael Kay 2001-12-22 15:09
00567 uncle! XHTML Basic and validation Jonathan Borden 2001-12-22 15:29
00623 Re: [xml-dev] NULL in C (was RE: [xml-dev] Why would MS want to make XML break on UNIX, Perl, Python, etc ?) David Brownell 2001-12-22 19:37
00560 Re: [xml-dev] W3C's five new XQuery/Xpath2 working drafts - Stil l missing Updates Soumitra Sengupta 2001-12-23 16:48
00624 SV: [xml-dev] W3C's five new XQuery/Xpath2 working drafts - Still missing Updates Jens Jakob Andersen, PDI 2001-12-23 16:54
00566 RE: [xml-dev] W3C's five new XQuery/Xpath2 working drafts - Stil l missing Updates Champion, Mike 2001-12-23 17:22
00568 SV: [xml-dev] W3C's five new XQuery/Xpath2 working drafts - Stil l missing Updates Jens Jakob Andersen, PDI 2001-12-23 22:28
00555 Announce: JaxMe Java/XML Wiedmann, Jochen 2001-12-23 22:41
00572 XML-based text editor: a proposal Dmitry Kirsanov 2001-12-24 00:04
00611 Re: [xml-dev] W3C's five new XQuery/Xpath2 working drafts - Still missing Updates David Brownell 2001-12-24 02:12
00626 XML Schema and Timezones [email protected] 2001-12-24 02:27
00627 Re: [xml-dev] XML Schema and Timezones Christopher R. Maden 2001-12-24 02:49
00610 Re: [xml-dev] XML-based text editor: a proposal Paul T 2001-12-24 03:02
00557 Re: [xml-dev] XML Schema and Timezones [email protected] 2001-12-24 04:44
00553 Re: [xml-dev] W3C's five new XQuery/Xpath2 working drafts - Still missing Updates Dare Obasanjo 2001-12-24 04:50
00569 Re: [xml-dev] XML Schema and Timezones Christopher R. Maden 2001-12-24 05:04
00559 Re: [xml-dev] XML Schema and Timezones [email protected] 2001-12-24 05:44
00565 Re: [xml-dev] XML Schema and Timezones [email protected] 2001-12-24 05:44
00635 Re: [xml-dev] XML-based text editor: a proposal Jonathan Borden 2001-12-24 15:20
00642 Re: [xml-dev] XML-based text editor: a proposal Dmitry Kirsanov 2001-12-24 15:35
00599 Re: [xml-dev] XML-based text editor: a proposal Dmitry Kirsanov 2001-12-24 15:58
00633 Re: [xml-dev] W3C's five new XQuery/Xpath2 working drafts - Still missing Updates Soumitra Sengupta 2001-12-24 17:01
00586 RE: [xml-dev] W3C's five new XQuery/Xpath2 working drafts - Stil l missing Updates Champion, Mike 2001-12-24 18:53
00589 Re: [xml-dev] W3C's five new XQuery/Xpath2 working drafts - Still missing Updates Jeff Greif 2001-12-24 19:13
00596 Re: [xml-dev] W3C's five new XQuery/Xpath2 working drafts - Still missing Updates Jonathan Robie 2001-12-24 19:39
00643 Re: SV: [xml-dev] W3C's five new XQuery/Xpath2 working drafts - Stil l missing Updates Jonathan Robie 2001-12-24 19:40
00648 Re: [xml-dev] XML-based text editor: a proposal Paul T 2001-12-24 21:38
00630 Re: [xml-dev] W3C's five new XQuery/Xpath2 working drafts - Still missing Updates Dare Obasanjo 2001-12-25 01:15
00588 Re: [xml-dev] XML-based text editor: a proposal Dmitry Kirsanov 2001-12-25 02:10
00597 Re: [xml-dev] XML-based text editor: a proposal Paul T 2001-12-25 02:53
00644 Re: [xml-dev] XML Schema and Timezones Justin Couch 2001-12-25 11:00
00632 SV: SV: [xml-dev] W3C's five new XQuery/Xpath2 working drafts - Stil l missing Updates Jens Jakob Andersen, PDI 2001-12-25 12:55
00636 "XSL FOs not there yet" [was Re: XML-based text editor: a proposal] Michael Smith 2001-12-26 09:08
00641 Re: [xml-dev] "XSL FOs not there yet" [was Re: XML-based text editor: a proposal] Paul T 2001-12-26 09:48
00598 Re: [xml-dev] XML, Java, & filters question... Niels Peter Strandberg 2001-12-26 14:32
00587 Re: [xml-dev] W3C's five new XQuery/Xpath2 working drafts - Still missing Updates Jonathan Robie 2001-12-26 16:57
00602 Re: SV: SV: [xml-dev] W3C's five new XQuery/Xpath2 working drafts - Still missing Updates Jonathan Robie 2001-12-26 17:00
00628 RE: [xml-dev] uncle! XHTML Basic and validation Michael Brennan 2001-12-26 20:33
00584 RE: [xml-dev] W3C's five new XQuery/Xpath2 working drafts - Sti ll missing Updates Champion, Mike 2001-12-26 20:35
00609 RE: [xml-dev] W3C's five new XQuery/Xpath2 working drafts - Still missing Updates Jonathan Robie 2001-12-26 22:26
00556 Re: [xml-dev] W3C's five new XQuery/Xpath2 working drafts - Still missing Updates Soumitra Sengupta 2001-12-26 22:38
00570 RE: [xml-dev] XML "tuple spaces" alpha technology demonstrated Naren Chawla 2001-12-26 23:08
00571 RE: [xml-dev] W3C's five new XQuery/Xpath2 working drafts - Sti ll missing Updates Champion, Mike 2001-12-27 00:20
00554 RE: [xml-dev] XML "tuple spaces" alpha technology demonstrated Champion, Mike 2001-12-27 01:15
00612 Re: [xml-dev] XML "tuple spaces" alpha technology demonstrated Gavin Thomas Nicol 2001-12-27 04:43
00625 Q. about 'DOM-Hash-total' Scherpenzeel, Wim 2001-12-27 09:47
00614 Re: [xml-dev] W3C's five new XQuery/Xpath2 working drafts - Still missing Updates Jonathan Robie 2001-12-27 13:23
00622 Re: [xml-dev] XML "tuple spaces" alpha technology demonstrated Sean McGrath 2001-12-27 13:51
00674 RE: [xml-dev] W3C's five new XQuery/Xpath2 working drafts - Still missing Updates Jonathan Robie 2001-12-27 14:52
00680 Re: [xml-dev] XML "tuple spaces" alpha technology demonstrated Jack Park 2001-12-27 15:37
00660 RE: [xml-dev] W3C's five new XQuery/Xpath2 working drafts - Sti ll missing Updates Champion, Mike 2001-12-27 16:59
00653 Is there XML Schema for XSLT? Takuki Kamiya 2001-12-27 17:32
00681 RE: [xml-dev] XML "tuple spaces" alpha technology demonstrated Champion, Mike 2001-12-27 18:36
00673 RE: [xml-dev] W3C's five new XQuery/Xpath2 working drafts - St ill missing Updates Champion, Mike 2001-12-27 18:39
00654 Re: [xml-dev] W3C's five new XQuery/Xpath2 working drafts - Still missing Updates Dare Obasanjo 2001-12-27 20:59
00659 Re: [xml-dev] W3C's five new XQuery/Xpath2 working drafts - Still missing Updates Dare Obasanjo 2001-12-27 21:31
00679 Re: [xml-dev] W3C's five new XQuery/Xpath2 working drafts - Still missing Updates Paul T 2001-12-27 22:24
00669 Re: [xml-dev] XML "Universal Types". Paul T 2001-12-28 02:50
00664 RE: [xml-dev] XML "tuple spaces" alpha technology demonstrated Don Park 2001-12-28 04:41
00676 Re: [xml-dev] W3C's five new XQuery/Xpath2 working drafts - Still missing Updates Dare Obasanjo 2001-12-28 04:51
00685 RE: [xml-dev] XML "tuple spaces" alpha technology demonstrated Jack Park 2001-12-28 05:06
00686 Font Verdana Raúl Carazo 2001-12-28 07:49
00687 RE: [xml-dev] Font Verdana Scherpenzeel, Wim 2001-12-28 14:07
00684 RE: [xml-dev] Font Verdana Manos Batsis 2001-12-28 14:22
00666 Re: [xml-dev] XML and mainframes, yet again Bjoern Hoehrmann 2001-12-28 14:30
00668 Re: [xml-dev] XML "tuple spaces" alpha technology demonstrated Gavin Thomas Nicol 2001-12-28 15:50
00662 Re: [xml-dev] XML "tuple spaces" alpha technology demonstrated Gavin Thomas Nicol 2001-12-28 15:58
00670 RE: [xml-dev] XML "tuple spaces" alpha technology demonstrated Champion, Mike 2001-12-28 17:11
00661 RE: [xml-dev] W3C's five new XQuery/Xpath2 working drafts - Stil l missing Updates Champion, Mike 2001-12-28 19:16
00672 Re: [xml-dev] XML "tuple spaces" alpha technology demonstrated Gavin Thomas Nicol 2001-12-28 20:28
00683 qname resolution question Takuki Kamiya 2001-12-28 21:59
00688 Re: [xml-dev] W3C's five new XQuery/Xpath2 working drafts - Still missing Updates Dare Obasanjo 2001-12-28 23:59
00689 Re: [xml-dev] qname resolution question Takuki Kamiya 2001-12-29 03:45
00682 Re: [xml-dev] qname resolution question Dare Obasanjo 2001-12-29 05:42
00671 Re: [xml-dev] qname resolution question Dare Obasanjo 2001-12-29 12:39
00663 Re: [xml-dev] qname resolution question Takuki Kamiya 2001-12-29 19:12
00667 The Two Poles of the XML World (was RE: [xml-dev] W3C's five new XQuery/Xpath2 working drafts - Still missing Updates) Champion, Mike 2001-12-30 18:13
00665 Re: [xml-dev] XML "tuple spaces" alpha technology demonstrated Mark Baker 2001-12-30 22:24
00678 RE: [xml-dev] The Two Poles of the XML World (was RE: [xml-dev] W3C's five new XQuery/Xpath2 working drafts - Still missing Updates) Champion, Mike 2001-12-31 14:43
00677 RE: [xml-dev] W3C's five new XQuery/Xpath2 working drafts - Stil l missing Updates Champion, Mike 2001-12-31 15:22
00655 RE: [xml-dev] XML "tuple spaces" alpha technology demonstrated Champion, Mike 2001-12-31 16:03
00658 Re: [xml-dev] XML "tuple spaces" alpha technology demonstrated Mark Baker 2001-12-31 16:53
00657 RE: [xml-dev] XML "tuple spaces" alpha technology demonstrated Champion, Mike 2001-12-31 17:10
00656 Re: [xml-dev] Packaging (was Re: [xml-dev] Interoperability) adam souzis 2001-12-31 19:03
00675 [Ann] Project Labrador Tom Bradford 2001-12-31 20:20