Lists Home |
Date Index |
- From: Peter@ursus.demon.co.uk (Peter Murray-Rust)
- To: firstname.lastname@example.org
- Date: Thu, 27 Feb 1997 15:19:56 GMT
This is very helpful, thanks.
In message <199702271514.KAA24157@nathaniel.ebt> email@example.com (Gavin Nicol) writes:
> I think for XML, we should probably get more concrete. The question
> is how much more concrete? How much information *must* the API support?
There are possibly two questions here. Do we need to _pass the information_,
and do we need to _have special names_ (rather than just Property). I suspect
that you will find it difficult to get rid of anything below that will
satisfy everyone. My own simple experience is that I would actively use
> Do we *need*
Comment, N (an XML processor _may_, but need not, pass these.
where would they be attached?)
EntityReference, Possibly, when I get brave
Entity etc. etc?
I would, however, be prepared to receive them as Property, so long as they
were clearly documented, and I assume that they might well be subclassed
from Property anyway.
Peter Murray-Rust, domestic net connection
Virtual School of Molecular Sciences
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To unsubscribe, send to firstname.lastname@example.org the following message;
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (email@example.com)