Lists Home |
Date Index |
- From: email@example.com (Gavin Nicol)
- To: Peter@ursus.demon.co.uk
- Date: Thu, 27 Feb 1997 10:45:38 -0500
>There are possibly two questions here. Do we need to _pass the information_,
>and do we need to _have special names_ (rather than just Property). I suspect
>that you will find it difficult to get rid of anything below that will
>satisfy everyone. My own simple experience is that I would actively use
OK. I think this is good arguments for actually defining these
classes, because people who want abstract groves can take these, and
build groves out of them.
>I would, however, be prepared to receive them as Property, so long as they
>were clearly documented, and I assume that they might well be subclassed
>from Property anyway.
Actually, from Node.
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To unsubscribe, send to firstname.lastname@example.org the following message;
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (email@example.com)