Lists Home |
Date Index |
- From: Peter Murray-Rust <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- To: email@example.com
- Date: Fri, 17 Oct 1997 14:34:04
At 10:13 17/10/97 +1000, you wrote:
>> From: Peter Murray-Rust <firstname.lastname@example.org>
>> (a) the author has to conform to a pre-defined spectrum of ideas (e.g. a
>> tax-return). [This is not required for CML, and any conformance is outside
>> what a DTD can deliver - e.g. value verification.]
>An SGML DTD can deliver value verification by using lexical typing.
>The online version of HyTime '97 has details. For example you can
>specify POSIX regular expressions for values of attributes or
>simple elements. You can use the lexical type mechanism with
>any lexical typing system of your own invention, not just POSIX.
>This extensibility is already there.
Can this be incorporated into an XML DTD? I don't immediately see how...
>> What I'd like to have is a wildcard #ANY (this has
>> already been suggested) which can be used for content models something like
>> the (currently illegal) XML:
>> <!ELEMENT MOL (#ANY,ATOMS,BONDS)*>
>Why not have
><!ELEMENT ANY - - ANY>
><!ELEMENT MOL - - (ANY, ATOMS, BONDS)*>
>That only costs 1 extra level of tag, and fits into existing SGML & XML.
Thanks - this seems like a smart idea, which can be extended. Of course the
'ANY' element is as about as real as the 'press ANY key' :-)
>If the function of a DTD is to abstract out invariant information from
>a class of documents. If your information is particularly variable and
>unforseeable then you need to use a couple more tags to represent what
Yes. And I suppose I can do the same thing with attributes.
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:email@example.com
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org the following message;
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:email@example.com the following message;
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org)