[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: Lisa Rein <lisarein@finetuning.com>
- To: David Megginson <ak117@freenet.carleton.ca>
- Date: Tue, 02 Jun 1998 15:12:50 -0700
David Megginson wrote:
>
> Lisa Rein writes:
>
> > Let's not forget that - although I have been personally amazed at
> > the unprecedented usefulness of this discussion group for its
> > unprecedented assistance to the WG on numerous occasions (and
> > myself personally :-) It is the XML WG -- NOT US -- that will
> > ultimately define "XSchema's" syntax etc. (if that is indeed what
> > hey decide it should be called).
>
> I don't know if this is -- strictly speaking -- true. The WG may
> define a core schema language, but I would be surprised if it is the
> only one.
I wasn't saying it had to be the only one, just that other ones would
most likely be built up FROM that. Am I wrong? Correct me.
lisa
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@ic.ac.uk)
|
