Lists Home |
Date Index |
- From: "W. Eliot Kimber" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- To: "XML Developers' List" <email@example.com>
- Date: Sat, 30 Jan 1999 17:15:57 -0600
At 12:52 PM 1/30/99 -0500, David Megginson wrote:
>In addition to these, workflow is highly desirable though not
>absolutely required. Others may want to add criteria that I missed.
Dependency tracking. I normally work with the following types of dependencies:
1. Storage-object-to-storage-object (e.g., doc-to-doc)
2. Use-by-reference relationships (re-use)
3. Semantic-object-to-semantic-object (e.g, element-to-element)
Note that I'm assuming that the repository understands and maintains the
storage object organization of the data when it existed outside the
repository (external text ("parsed") entities excepted--they are evil and
should be expunged from human memory).
These requirements are more than a simple where-used requirement, although
the facilities you need to satisfy the general where-used requirement can
be used to satisfy these requirements.
W. Eliot Kimber, Senior Consulting SGML Engineer
ISOGEN International Corp.
2200 N. Lamar St., Suite 230, Dallas, TX 75202. 214.953.0004
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:email@example.com the following message;
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org the following message;
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:email@example.com)