[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
- To: John Cowan <cowan@locke.ccil.org>, xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
- Date: Sun, 31 Jan 1999 16:53:32 -0800
At 08:24 PM 1/31/99 +73900, John Cowan wrote:
>Assign a sequentially increasing number to each *tag* (start-tag or end-tag)
>in the document, treating an empty tag as a start-tag followed by an
>end-tag. Then e1 is a descendant of e2 iff e1.start > e2.start
>and e1.end < e2.end. Also, e1 is a left sibling of e2 (and e2 is
>a right sibling of e1) iff e1.end + 1 = e2.start; e1 is the leftmost
>child of e2 iff e1.start = e2.start + 1. Modeling the child/parent
>relationship is not so easy, and requires iteration.
This structure has all sorts of advantages; that's how the
Open Text SGML-savvy search engine of yore used to run. Fast as
hell, equal access to any & all elements without performance
penalty.
But hard to update.
-T.
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@ic.ac.uk)
|