xml-dev


FOCUS AREAS \| XML-DEV \| XML.org DAILY NEWSLINK \| REGISTRY \| RESOURCES \| ABOUT

xml-dev

Last updated: Sun Mar 16 17:11:23 2003
961 messages in chronological order | Thread Index

XML and special Characters : unicode v3.0 ? - From: "Baden Hughes" <bmhughes@ozemail.com.au>
RE: W3C spec.dtd - From: Jarle Stabell <jarle.stabell@dokpro.uio.no>
W3C-transformation language petition - From: Paul Prescod <paul@prescod.net>
Re: Streaming XML and SAX - From: "Bill la Forge" <b.laforge@jxml.com>
XLINK role attribute for simple links? - From: MikeDacon@aol.com
W3C spec.dtd - From: Stefan Mintert <mintert@irb.informatik.uni-dortmund.de>
RE: Streaming XML and SAX - From: "Didier PH Martin" <martind@netfolder.com>
Re: Streaming XML and SAX - From: Tom Harding <tomh@thinlink.com>
Re: Streaming XML and SAX - From: Nathan Kurz <nate@valleytel.net>
Re: Streaming XML and SAX - From: David Megginson <david@megginson.com>
Re: Streaming XML and SAX - From: Tom Harding <tomh@thinlink.com>
Re: Yet another niggling XML syntax question - From: Richard Goerwitz <richard@goon.stg.brown.edu>
Another Step Toward XML Content - From: Ralph Ferris <ralph@fsc.fujitsu.com>
Yet another niggling XML syntax question - From: roddey@us.ibm.com
RE: Streams, protocols, documents and fragments - From: "Didier PH Martin" <martind@netfolder.com>
RE: Streams, protocols, documents and fragments - From: <Michael.Orr@Design-Intelligence.com>
Re: Are notations dead, or just pining for the fjords? (was Re: SAX and delayed entity loading) - From: John Cowan <cowan@locke.ccil.org>
Comments on WD-html-in-xml-19990224 - From: John Cowan <cowan@locke.ccil.org>
HyBrick Download Problem Fixed - From: Ralph Ferris <ralph@fsc.fujitsu.com>
Re: recursing root element - From: John Cowan <cowan@locke.ccil.org>
RE: Well-formed vs. valid - From: roddey@us.ibm.com
Re: Content-Document-Type: was (Re: MIME types vs. DOCTYPE) - From: Walter Underwood <wunder@infoseek.com>
RE: events vs callbacks (was Re: SAX2 (was Re: DOM vs. SAX??? Nah. )) - From: Ron Daniel <RDaniel@DATAFUSION.net>
Re: events vs callbacks (was Re: SAX2 (was Re: DOM vs. SAX??? Nah. )) - From: Ken MacLeod <ken@bitsko.slc.ut.us>
Architecture docs for SAX - From: David Megginson <david@megginson.com>
Re: Streams, protocols, documents and fragments - From: Tom Harding <tomh@thinlink.com>
Re: XML with CSS in IE5 - From: Jonathan Robie <jonathan@texcel.no>
Re: recursing root element - From: "James Tauber" <jtauber@jtauber.com>
RE: Content-Document-Type: was (Re: MIME types vs. DOCTYPE) - From: "Jonathan Borden" <jborden@mediaone.net>
RE: recursing root element - From: Ronald Bourret <rbourret@ito.tu-darmstadt.de>
Re: XML with CSS in IE5 - From: "John E. Simpson" <simpson@polaris.net>
Re: events vs callbacks - From: "Bill la Forge" <b.laforge@jxml.com>
Re: Content-Document-Type: was (Re: MIME types vs. DOCTYPE) - From: MURATA Makoto <murata@apsdc.ksp.fujixerox.co.jp>
Re: XML with CSS in IE5 - From: Chris Maden <crism@oreilly.com>
Re: XML with CSS in IE5 - From: "Frank Boumphrey" <bckman@ix.netcom.com>
recursing root element - From: "Frank Boumphrey" <bckman@ix.netcom.com>
Re: XML with CSS in IE5 - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>
Re: Streams, protocols, documents and fragments - From: David Megginson <david@megginson.com>
Re: events vs callbacks (was Re: SAX2 (was Re: DOM vs. SAX??? Nah. )) - From: David Megginson <david@megginson.com>
XML with CSS in IE5 - From: "Chung, Byung Hee" <chtino@hnc.co.kr>
Re: Well-formed vs. valid - From: David Brownell <db@Eng.Sun.COM>
Re: events vs callbacks (was Re: SAX2 (was Re: DOM vs. SAX??? Nah. )) - From: Gabe Beged-Dov <begeddov@jfinity.com>
RE: Streaming XML (Was RE: XML Information Set Requirements, W3C Note 18-February-1999) - From: "Jonathan Borden" <jborden@mediaone.net>
Content-Document-Type: was (Re: MIME types vs. DOCTYPE) - From: "Jonathan Borden" <jborden@mediaone.net>
ANNOUNCE: "HyBrick" Browser, V0.82 - From: Ralph Ferris <ralph@fsc.fujitsu.com>
Re: Proposal to standardise a Java API - From: "John Wilson" <tug@wilson.co.uk>
Re: Proposal to standardise a Java API - From: David Brownell <db@Eng.Sun.COM>
Architecture docs for SAX - From: "Merriam, Rudyard" <Rudyard.Merriam@COMPAQ.com>
RE: Well-formed vs. valid - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>
Layered Model for XML - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>
Proposal to standardise a Java API - From: "John Wilson" <tug@wilson.co.uk>
ANNOUNCE: RDF DTD available - From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@allette.com.au>
Re: Streams, protocols, documents and fragments - From: Tom Harding <tomh@thinlink.com>
RE: Well-formed vs. valid - From: roddey@us.ibm.com
Re: events vs callbacks (was Re: SAX2 (was Re: DOM vs. SAX??? Nah. )) - From: "Bill la Forge" <b.laforge@jxml.com>
Re: events vs callbacks (was Re: SAX2 (was Re: DOM vs. SAX??? Nah. )) - From: Paul Rabin <rabin@shore.net>
MIME and X(HT)ML (Re: MIME types vs. DOCTYPE) - From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@allette.com.au>
Re: events vs callbacks (was Re: SAX2 (was Re: DOM vs. SAX??? Nah. )) - From: Gabe Beged-Dov <begeddov@jfinity.com>
Re: events vs callbacks (was Re: SAX2 (was Re: DOM vs. SAX??? Nah. )) - From: David Megginson <david@megginson.com>
RE: Streaming XML (Was RE: XML Information Set Requirements, W3C Note 18-February-1999) - From: keshlam@us.ibm.com
RE: Streams, protocols, documents and fragments - From: keshlam@us.ibm.com
RE: MIME types vs. DOCTYPE (was RE: ANNOUNCE: New XHTML WD) - From: David Megginson <david@megginson.com>
RE: Streams, protocols, documents and fragments - From: David Megginson <david@megginson.com>
Re: Streams, protocols, documents and fragments - From: David Megginson <david@megginson.com>
RE: having to deal with mal-formed XML - From: "Matthew Sergeant (EML)" <Matthew.Sergeant@eml.ericsson.se>
Re: having to deal with mal-formed XML - From: "Eric Prud'hommeaux" <eric@w3.org>
Re: Streaming XML (Was RE: XML Information Set Requirements, W3C Note 18-February-1999) - From: Marcelo Cantos <marcelo@mds.rmit.edu.au>
Re: ANNOUNCE: New XHTML WD - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>
RE: MIME types vs. DOCTYPE (was RE: ANNOUNCE: New XHTML WD) - From: "Jeffrey E. Sussna" <jes@kuantech.com>
RE: Streams, protocols, documents and fragments - From: <Marc.McDonald@Design-Intelligence.com>
RE: MIME types vs. DOCTYPE (was RE: ANNOUNCE: New XHTML WD) - From: "Jonathan Borden" <jborden@mediaone.net>
Re: MIME types vs. DOCTYPE (was RE: ANNOUNCE: New XHTML WD) - From: "Bill la Forge" <b.laforge@jxml.com>
Re: MIME types vs. DOCTYPE (was RE: ANNOUNCE: New XHTML WD) - From: Ken MacLeod <ken@bitsko.slc.ut.us>
Re: Streams, protocols, documents and fragments - From: Ken MacLeod <ken@bitsko.slc.ut.us>
RE UML vs groves (Was Streaming XML) - From: Terry Allen <tallen@sonic.net>
Re: Streaming XML (Was RE: XML Information Set Requirements, W3C Note 18-February-1999) - From: "Steven R. Newcomb" <srn@techno.com>
Re: Streams, protocols, documents and fragments - From: Thomas Geer <tgeer@sunset.net>
RE: Streams, protocols, documents and fragments - From: Mark Birbeck <Mark.Birbeck@iedigital.net>
Re: Streams, protocols, documents and fragments - From: Tom Harding <tomh@thinlink.com>
Re: Question about New XHTML WD - From: John Cowan <cowan@locke.ccil.org>
Re: Streaming XML and SAX - From: Walter Underwood <wunder@infoseek.com>
Re: ANNOUNCE: New XHTML WD - From: David Megginson <david@megginson.com>
Re: Streams, protocols, documents and fragments - From: David Megginson <david@megginson.com>
RE: Streams, protocols, documents and fragments was: RE: Documents and Document Fragments (Was RE: XML Information Set Requirements, W3C Note 18-February-1999) - From: Mark Birbeck <Mark.Birbeck@iedigital.net>
Re: Streaming XML and SAX - From: David Megginson <david@megginson.com>
Re: ANNOUNCE: New XHTML WD - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>
Re: ANNOUNCE: New XHTML WD - From: Clark Evans <clark.evans@manhattanproject.com>
Re: Streams, protocols, documents and fragments - From: Tom Harding <tomh@thinlink.com>
Re: Multiple namespaces for HTML... why? - From: james anderson <James.Anderson@mecomnet.de>
Re: Streaming XML and SAX - From: Tom Harding <tomh@thinlink.com>
Re: having to deal with mal-formed XML - From: Jonathan Eisenzopf <eisen@pobox.com>
Re: Documents and Document Fragments - From: Paul Grosso <pgrosso@arbortext.com>
Re: MIME types vs. DOCTYPE (was RE: ANNOUNCE: New XHTML WD) - From: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
Multiple namespaces for HTML... why? - From: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
RE: Documents and Document Fragments - From: Mark Birbeck <Mark.Birbeck@iedigital.net>
Question about New XHTML WD - From: "Jeff Greif" <jmg@trivida.com>
MIME types vs. DOCTYPE (was RE: ANNOUNCE: New XHTML WD) - From: David Megginson <david@megginson.com>
Re: ANNOUNCE: New XHTML WD - From: "Frank Boumphrey" <bckman@ix.netcom.com>
Re: Documents and Document Fragments - From: Lauren Wood <lauren@sqwest.bc.ca>
FW: ANNOUNCE: New XHTML WD - From: Daniel Austin <daniela@cnet.com>
RE: More XML Identity Angst - From: Andrew Layman <andrewl@microsoft.com>
RE: ANNOUNCE: New XHTML WD - From: "Jonathan Borden" <jborden@mediaone.net>
ANNOUNCE: New XHTML WD - From: "Frank Boumphrey" <bckman@ix.netcom.com>
Re: Streams, protocols, documents and fragments - From: John Cowan <cowan@locke.ccil.org>
Re: "Empty" Text Nodes - From: John Cowan <cowan@locke.ccil.org>
RE: Streams, protocols, documents and fragments - From: Mark Birbeck <Mark.Birbeck@iedigital.net>
RE: Streams, protocols, documents and fragments - From: "Matthew Sergeant (EML)" <Matthew.Sergeant@eml.ericsson.se>
RE: Streaming XML (Was RE: XML Information Set Requirements, W3C Note 18-February-1999) - From: "Borden, Jonathan" <jborden@mediaone.net>
RE: Documents and Document Fragments - From: Tim.Shaw@wdr.com
RE: ANNOUNCE: XML Conformance Public Information Page - From: "G. Ken Holman" <gkholman@CraneSoftwrights.com>
RE: Streams, protocols, documents and fragments - From: Tim.Shaw@wdr.com
RE: Streams, protocols, documents and fragments - From: "Borden, Jonathan" <jborden@mediaone.net>
Re: Streaming XML (Was RE: XML Information Set Requirements, W3C Note 18-February-1999) - From: "Steven R. Newcomb" <srn@techno.com>
RE: Documents and Document Fragments - From: Mark Birbeck <Mark.Birbeck@iedigital.net>
RE: Streams, protocols, documents and fragments - From: Mark Birbeck <Mark.Birbeck@iedigital.net>
re: Streaming XML and SAX - From: David Megginson <david@megginson.com>
RE: Streaming XML (Was RE: XML Information Set Requirements, W3C Note 18-February-1999) - From: "Borden, Jonathan" <jborden@mediaone.net>
Streaming XML and SAX - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>
RE: Streams, protocols, documents and fragments - From: "Borden, Jonathan" <jborden@mediaone.net>
RE: Well-formed vs. valid - From: <Marc.McDonald@Design-Intelligence.com>
RE: FW: XML Mail - From: "Borden, Jonathan" <jborden@mediaone.net>
Re: Streaming XML (Was RE: XML Information Set Requirements, W3C Note 18-February-1999) - From: len bullard <cbullard@hiwaay.net>
Re: Streaming XML (Was RE: XML Information Set Requirements, W3C Note 18-February-1999) - From: len bullard <cbullard@hiwaay.net>
Re: Streaming XML (Was RE: XML Information Set Requirements, W3C Note 18-February-1999) - From: len bullard <cbullard@hiwaay.net>
Re: events vs callbacks (was Re: SAX2 (was Re: DOM vs. SAX??? Nah. )) - From: "Bill la Forge" <b.laforge@jxml.com>
re: Streams, protocols, documents and fragments - From: Nathan Kurz <nate@valleytel.net>
RE: Documents and Document Fragments - From: Nathan Kurz <nate@valleytel.net>
Re: Streaming XML (Was RE: XML Information Set Requirements, W3C Note 18-February-1999) - From: Lauren Wood <lauren@sqwest.bc.ca>
RE: ANNOUNCE: XML Conformance Public Information Page - From: Ralph Ferris <ralph@fsc.fujitsu.com>
Re: Streaming XML (Was RE: XML Information Set Requirements, W3C Note 18-February-1999) - From: "Steven R. Newcomb" <srn@techno.com>
Re: Streaming XML (Was RE: XML Information Set Requirements, W3C Note 18-February-1999) - From: Marcus Carr <mrc@allette.com.au>
Re: FW: XML Mail - From: Clark Evans <clark.evans@manhattanproject.com>
RE: ANNOUNCE: XML Conformance Public Information Page - From: "Didier PH Martin" <martind@netfolder.com>
Re: ModSAX (SAX 1.1) Proposal - From: David Megginson <david@megginson.com>
RE: Streaming XML (Was RE: XML Information Set Requirements, W3C Note 18-February-1999) - From: Mark Birbeck <Mark.Birbeck@iedigital.net>
Re: Streaming XML - From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@allette.com.au>
Fw: Streaming XML - From: "Oren Ben-Kiki" <oren@capella.co.il>
RE: Streaming XML - From: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
RE: Streaming XML (Was RE: XML Information Set Requirements, W3C Note 18-February-1999) - From: "Eisele, Fred" <fred.eisele@eds.com>
RE: Streaming XML (Was RE: XML Information Set Requirements, W3C Note 18-February-1999) - From: Mark Birbeck <Mark.Birbeck@iedigital.net>
FYI: MS to ship IE5 on March 18th... - From: "Scot Wingo (nTronix)" <scot@ntronix.com>
RE: Streaming XML - From: David Megginson <david@megginson.com>
ANNOUNCE: XML Conformance Public Information Page - From: "G. Ken Holman" <gkholman@CraneSoftwrights.com>
Re: XML implementation in MS-Word - From: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
RE: Streaming XML (Was RE: XML Information Set Requirements, W3C Note 18-February-1999) - From: "Hutchison, Nigel" <nwoh@software-ag.de>
Re: XTech '99 starts in two weeks - From: Paul Prescod <paul@prescod.net>
RE: Streaming XML (Was RE: XML Information Set Requirements, W3C Note 18-February-1999) - From: "Matthew Sergeant (EML)" <Matthew.Sergeant@eml.ericsson.se>
XML AND Semiconductor industry? - From: Eric Huang <hfhuang@iii.org.tw>
XML implementation in MS-Word - From: "Chung, Byung Hee" <chtino@hnc.co.kr>
Re: ModSAX (SAX 1.1) Proposal - From: "Don Park" <donpark@quake.net>
Re: Streaming XML (Was RE: XML Information Set Requirements, W3C Note 18-February-1999) - From: Paul Prescod <paul@prescod.net>
Re: ModSAX (SAX 1.1) Proposal - From: James Clark <jjc@jclark.com>
RE: Streaming XML (Was RE: XML Information Set Requirements, W3C Note 18-February-1999) - From: "Borden, Jonathan" <jborden@mediaone.net>
RE: Streams, protocols, documents and fragments was: RE: Documents and Document Fragments (Was RE: XML Information Set Requirements, W3C Note 18-February-1999) - From: "Borden, Jonathan" <jborden@mediaone.net>
Re: events vs callbacks (was Re: SAX2 (was Re: DOM vs. SAX??? Nah. )) - From: Gabe Beged-Dov <begeddov@jfinity.com>
Re: More XML Identity Angst - From: "James Tauber" <jtauber@jtauber.com>
Re: Streams, protocols, documents and fragments was: RE: Documents and Document Fragments (Was RE: XML Information Set Requirements, W3C Note 18-February-1999) - From: "James Tauber" <jtauber@jtauber.com>
localised declarations (Re: XML Information Set Requirements, W3C Note 18-February-1999) - From: "James Tauber" <jtauber@jtauber.com>
Re: Streams, protocols, documents and fragments was: RE: Documents and Document Fragments (Was RE: XML Information Set Requirements, W3C Note 18-February-1999) - From: "James Tauber" <jtauber@jtauber.com>
Re: Streaming XML (Was RE: XML Information Set Requirements, W3C Note 18-February-1999) - From: len bullard <cbullard@hiwaay.net>
RE: Streaming XML? [was Re: XML Information Set Requirements..] - From: "Paul Butkiewicz" <arabbit@earthlink.net>
RE: Documents and Document Fragments (Was RE: XML Information Set Requirements, W3C Note 18-February-1999) - From: Mark Birbeck <Mark.Birbeck@iedigital.net>
Re: SAX and Standards Bodies (was Streaming XML?) - From: Rob Schoening <rschoening@unforgettable.com>
Re: events vs callbacks (was Re: SAX2 (was Re: DOM vs. SAX??? Nah. )) - From: "Bill la Forge" <b.laforge@jxml.com>
Re: SAX and Standards Bodies (was Streaming XML?) - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>
RE: Validation Conditions (was Streaming XML (was ...)) - From: David Megginson <david@megginson.com>
Announce: DTDGenerator frontend. - From: "Paul at Sunnyvale" <paul@qub.com>
RE: Well-formed vs. valid - From: "Jeffrey E. Sussna" <jes@kuantech.com>
events vs callbacks (was Re: SAX2 (was Re: DOM vs. SAX??? Nah. )) - From: Gabe Beged-Dov <begeddov@jfinity.com>
Re: Well-formed vs. valid - From: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
RE: Streaming XML (Was RE: XML Information Set Requirements, W3C Note 18-February-1999) - From: Mark Birbeck <Mark.Birbeck@iedigital.net>
Re: Latin (was Re: Announcement: XML Infoset Requirements Published) - From: John Cowan <cowan@locke.ccil.org>
Re: Streaming XML (Was RE: XML Information Set Requirements, W3C Note 18-February-1999) - From: John Cowan <cowan@locke.ccil.org>
Re: Streaming XML (Was RE: XML Information Set Requirements, W3C Note 18-February-1999) - From: David Megginson <david@megginson.com>
Well-formed vs. valid - From: "Jeffrey E. Sussna" <jes@kuantech.com>
RE: Validation Conditions (was Streaming XML (was ...)) - From: Michael.Kay@icl.com
Re: layering specs - From: Walter Underwood <wunder@infoseek.com>
Re: Confusion about conditional sections - From: roddey@us.ibm.com
Re: layering specs - From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@allette.com.au>
Re: Streaming XML (Was RE: XML Information Set Requirements, W3C Note 18-February-1999) - From: Richard Tobin <richard@cogsci.ed.ac.uk>
SAX and Standards Bodies (was Streaming XML?) - From: David Megginson <david@megginson.com>
Submitting comments on the XML Infoset Requirements - From: David Megginson <david@megginson.com>
More XML Identity Angst - From: David Megginson <david@megginson.com>
Re: Streaming XML (Was RE: XML Information Set Requirements, W3C Note 18-February-1999) - From: John Cowan <cowan@locke.ccil.org>
Re: Latin (was Re: Announcement: XML Infoset RequirementsPublished) - From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@metalab.unc.edu>
Stateful http xml middleware w/ servlets? - From: Robb Shecter <shecter@darmstadt.gmd.de>
Streaming XML? [was Re: XML Information Set Requirements..] - From: Tim.Shaw@wdr.com
Re: XML Information Set Requirements, W3C Note 18-February-1999 - From: Clark Evans <clark.evans@manhattanproject.com>
RE: Streams, protocols, documents and fragments was: RE: Documents and Document Fragments (Was RE: XML Information Set Requirements, W3C Note 18-February-1999) - From: Mark Birbeck <Mark.Birbeck@iedigital.net>
Re: XML Information Set Requirements, W3C Note 18-February-1999 - From: "Don Park" <donpark@quake.net>
Streams, protocols, documents and fragments was: RE: Documents and Document Fragments (Was RE: XML Information Set Requirements, W3C Note 18-February-1999) - From: "Borden, Jonathan" <jborden@mediaone.net>
Re: XML Information Set Requirements, W3C Note 18-February-1999 - From: Ralph Ferris <ralph@fsc.fujitsu.com>
test - From: "Sunny Sun" <sunny@comax.com.tw>
Latin (was Re: Announcement: XML Infoset Requirements Published) - From: "James Tauber" <jtauber@jtauber.com>
Re: XML Information Set Requirements, W3C Note 18-February-1999 - From: "James Tauber" <jtauber@jtauber.com>
RE: Announcement: XML Infoset Requirements Published - From: Rob Schoening <rschoening@unforgettable.com>
Re: Documents and Document Fragments (Was RE: XML Information Set Requirements, W3C Note 18-February-1999) - From: "James Tauber" <jtauber@jtauber.com>
layering specs - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>
Re: Streaming XML (Was RE: XML Information Set Requirements, W3C Note 18-February-1999) - From: Marcelo Cantos <marcelo@mds.rmit.edu.au>
RE: Announcement: XML Infoset Requirements Published - From: David Megginson <david@megginson.com>
XTech '99 starts in two weeks - From: Jon.Bosak@eng.Sun.COM (Jon Bosak)
Announcement: XML to DDML Converter available - From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@allette.com.au>
RE: Announcement: XML Infoset Requirements Published - From: Rob Schoening <rschoening@unforgettable.com>
Re: XML Information Set Requirements, W3C Note 18-February-1999 - From: Paul Prescod <paul@prescod.net>
Re: ModSAX (SAX 1.1) Proposal - From: David Megginson <david@megginson.com>
RE: Announcement: XML Infoset Requirements Published - From: David Megginson <david@megginson.com>
Re: XML Information Set Requirements, W3C Note 18-February-1999 - From: David Megginson <david@megginson.com>
RE: Documents and Document Fragments (Was RE: XML Information Set Requirements, W3C Note 18-February-1999) - From: Mark Birbeck <Mark.Birbeck@iedigital.net>
RE: Streaming XML (Was RE: XML Information Set Requirements, W3C Note 18-February-1999) - From: Mark Birbeck <Mark.Birbeck@iedigital.net>
RE: Streaming XML (Was RE: XML Information Set Requirements, W3C Note 18-February-1999) - From: Mark Birbeck <Mark.Birbeck@iedigital.net>
Re: ModSAX (SAX 1.1) Proposal - From: "Don Park" <donpark@quake.net>
Re: XML Information Set Requirements, W3C Note 18-February-1999 - From: "Don Park" <donpark@quake.net>
Re: Documents and Document Fragments (Was RE: XML Information Set Requirements, W3C Note 18-February-1999) - From: "James Tauber" <jtauber@jtauber.com>
Re: Streaming XML (Was RE: XML Information Set Requirements, W3C Note 18-February-1999) - From: Marcelo Cantos <marcelo@mds.rmit.edu.au>
New MDSAX and Coins release - From: "Bill la Forge" <b.laforge@jxml.com>
Re: ModSAX (SAX 1.1) Proposal - From: James Clark <jjc@jclark.com>
Re: ModSAX (SAX 1.1) Proposal - From: "Don Park" <donpark@quake.net>
Re: Confusion about conditional sections - From: "Richard L. Goerwitz III" <richard@goon.stg.brown.edu>
RE: FW: XML Mail - From: "Borden, Jonathan" <jborden@mediaone.net>
RE: Documents and Document Fragments (Was RE: XML Information Set Req uirements, W3C Note 18-February-1999) - From: "Didier PH Martin" <martind@netfolder.com>
Streaming XML (Was RE: XML Information Set Requirements, W3C Note 18-February-1999) - From: Mark Birbeck <Mark.Birbeck@iedigital.net>
Documents and Document Fragments (Was RE: XML Information Set Requirements, W3C Note 18-February-1999) - From: Mark Birbeck <Mark.Birbeck@iedigital.net>
Re: XML Information Set Requirements, W3C Note 18-February-1999 - From: "Bill la Forge" <b.laforge@jxml.com>
Re: XML Information Set Requirements, W3C Note 18-February-1999 - From: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
Re: XML Information Set Requirements, W3C Note 18-February-1999 - From: Paul Prescod <paul@prescod.net>
Re: XML Information Set Requirements, W3C Note 18-February-1999 - From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@allette.com.au>
Re: XML Information Set Requirements, W3C Note 18-February-1999 - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>
Re: XML Information Set Requirements, W3C Note 18-February-1999 - From: len bullard <cbullard@hiwaay.net>
Re: XML Information Set Requirements, W3C Note 18-February-1999 - From: "James Tauber" <jtauber@jtauber.com>
RE: Announcement: XML Infoset Requirements Published - From: Michael.Kay@icl.com
Re: XML Information Set Requirements, W3C Note 18-February-1999 - From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@allette.com.au>
Re: XML Information Set Requirements, W3C Note 18-February-1999 - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>
Re: ModSAX (SAX 1.1) Proposal - From: "Bill la Forge" <b.laforge@jxml.com>
Blockland (was Re: XML Information Set Requirements, W3C Note 18-February-1999) - From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@allette.com.au>
Re: XML Information Set Requirements, W3C Note 18-February-1999 - From: "James Tauber" <jtauber@jtauber.com>
Re: ModSAX (SAX 1.1) Proposal - From: James Clark <jjc@jclark.com>
RE: XML Information Set Requirements, W3C Note 18-February-1999 - From: <Marc.McDonald@Design-Intelligence.com>
Re: Confusion about conditional sections - From: "Chris Olds" <colds@nwlink.com>
XML Product Manager opening at CommerceOne - From: matt@veosystems.com
RE: XML Information Set Requirements, W3C Note 18-February-1999 - From: <Michael.Orr@Design-Intelligence.com>
RE: XML Information Set Requirements, W3C Note 18-February-1999 - From: "Jeffrey E. Sussna" <jes@kuantech.com>
Re: Exceptions or not (Was: RE: ModSAX (SAX 1.1) Proposal) - From: David Brownell <db@Eng.Sun.COM>
RE: XML Information Set Requirements, W3C Note 18-February-1999 - From: Walter Underwood <wunder@infoseek.com>
From XML to Latin Was: XML Information Set Requirements, W3C Note 18-February-1999 - From: Rob Schoening <rschoening@unforgettable.com>
RE: XML Information Set Requirements, W3C Note 18-February-1999 - From: "Jeffrey E. Sussna" <jes@kuantech.com>
Re: XML Information Set Requirements, W3C Note 18-February-1999 - From: Paul Prescod <paul@prescod.net>
RE: XML Information Set Requirements, W3C Note 18-February-1999 - From: "Jeffrey E. Sussna" <jes@kuantech.com>
Re: XML Information Set Requirements, W3C Note 18-February-1999 - From: John Cowan <cowan@locke.ccil.org>
Re: Confusion about conditional sections - From: John Cowan <cowan@locke.ccil.org>
Re: XML Information Set Requirements, W3C Note 18-February-1999 - From: Nathan Kurz <nate@valleytel.net>
Re: Confusion about conditional sections - From: David Brownell <db@Eng.Sun.COM>
Confusion about conditional sections - From: roddey@us.ibm.com
Fw: XML Information Set Requirements, W3C Note 18-February-1999 - From: "Oren Ben-Kiki" <oren@capella.co.il>
Re: XML Information Set Requirements, W3C Note 18-February-1999 - From: John Cowan <cowan@locke.ccil.org>
ANNOUNCE: IBTWSH draft 5 - From: John Cowan <cowan@locke.ccil.org>
Re: Announcement: XML Infoset Requirements Published - From: John Cowan <cowan@locke.ccil.org>
RE: XML Information Set Requirements, W3C Note 18-February-1999 - From: <Michael.Orr@Design-Intelligence.com>
XML Information Set Requirements and XP - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>
Re: FW: XML Mail - From: John Cowan <cowan@locke.ccil.org>
xsl tutorials - From: Harold Goldstein <dcbiker@goldray.com>
RE: XML Information Set Requirements, W3C Note 18-February-1999 - From: "Jeffrey E. Sussna" <jes@kuantech.com>
Re: FW: XML Mail - From: "Robert Hanson" <rhanson@blast.net>
Re: Announcement: XML Infoset Requirements Published - From: Ken MacLeod <ken@bitsko.slc.ut.us>
Re: FW: XML Mail - From: John Cowan <cowan@locke.ccil.org>
RE: FW: XML Mail - From: "Matthew Sergeant (EML)" <Matthew.Sergeant@eml.ericsson.se>
RE: FW: XML Mail - From: David Megginson <david@megginson.com>
RE: FW: XML Mail - From: "Borden, Jonathan" <jborden@mediaone.net>
Re: FW: XML Mail - From: John Cowan <cowan@locke.ccil.org>
Re: XML Information Set Requirements, W3C Note 18-February-1999 - From: Marcus Carr <mrc@allette.com.au>
Re: XML Information Set Requirements, W3C Note 18-February-1999 - From: Clark Evans <clark.evans@manhattanproject.com>
FW: XML Mail - From: "Borden, Jonathan" <jborden@mediaone.net>
Re: XML Information Set Requirements, W3C Note 18-February-1999 - From: Marcus Carr <mrc@allette.com.au>
RE: XML Information Set Requirements, W3C Note 18-February-1999 - From: "Didier PH Martin" <martind@netfolder.com>
Re: XML Information Set Requirements, W3C Note 18-February-1999 - From: Marcus Carr <mrc@allette.com.au>
XML Information Set Requirements, W3C Note 18-February-1999 - From: Clark Evans <clark.evans@manhattanproject.com>
Re: XML Mail - From: Clark Evans <clark.evans@manhattanproject.com>
A question for developers - From: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
Announcement: XML Infoset Requirements Published - From: David Megginson <david@megginson.com>
XML Mail - From: David Megginson <david@megginson.com>
XML Mail - From: Clark Evans <clark.evans@manhattanproject.com>
Re: Office 2000 and XML - From: Jerome McDonough <jmcdonou@library.berkeley.edu>
Office 2000 and XML - From: Paul Prescod <paul@prescod.net>
Re: URIs as IDs in ModSAX (was Re: ModSAX (SAX 1.1) Proposal) (fwd) - From: "Don Park" <donpark@quake.net>
Re: XML DTD vs. XML-Data - From: "Jeff Greif" <jmg@trivida.com>
XML DTD vs. XML-Data - From: "Tiago Moitinho de Almeida" <tma@chiron.pt>
RE: URIs as IDs in ModSAX (was Re: ModSAX (SAX 1.1) Proposal) (fwd) - From: Ron Daniel <RDaniel@DATAFUSION.net>
RE: CV/Resume - From: Mark Birbeck <Mark.Birbeck@iedigital.net>
Re: URIs as IDs in ModSAX (was Re: ModSAX (SAX 1.1) Proposal) (fwd) - From: Robb Shecter <shecter@darmstadt.gmd.de>
FW: CV/Resume - From: "Livingstone, Stephen" <Livinsb@rbos.co.uk>
RE: CV/Resume - From: "Matthew Sergeant (EML)" <Matthew.Sergeant@eml.ericsson.se>
Immediate opening for XSL Pro! - From: "Rick Ross" <rick@activated.com>
Re: ModSAX (SAX 1.1) Proposal - From: "Don Park" <donpark@quake.net>
RE: from a new member - From: Mark Birbeck <Mark.Birbeck@iedigital.net>
Re: URIs as IDs in ModSAX (was Re: ModSAX (SAX 1.1) Proposal) (fwd) - From: John Cowan <cowan@locke.ccil.org>
Re: from a new member - From: Ruth Bergman <Ruth@jpl.nasa.gov>
Re: URIs as IDs in ModSAX (was Re: ModSAX (SAX 1.1) Proposal) (fwd) - From: David Megginson <david@megginson.com>
Re: URIs as IDs in ModSAX (was Re: ModSAX (SAX 1.1) Proposal) (fwd) - From: John Cowan <cowan@locke.ccil.org>
Re: URIs as IDs in ModSAX - From: John Cowan <cowan@locke.ccil.org>
Re: URIs as IDs in ModSAX (was Re: ModSAX (SAX 1.1) Proposal) (fwd) - From: David Megginson <david@megginson.com>
Re: URIs as IDs in ModSAX (was Re: ModSAX (SAX 1.1) Proposal) (fwd) - From: Dan Brickley <Daniel.Brickley@bristol.ac.uk>
RE: ModSAX (SAX 1.1) Proposal - From: David Megginson <david@megginson.com>
Re: URIs as IDs in ModSAX (was Re: ModSAX (SAX 1.1) Proposal) (fwd) - From: Robb Shecter <shecter@darmstadt.gmd.de>
RE: ModSAX (SAX 1.1) Proposal - From: "Ingargiola, Tito" <ti64877@imcnam.sbi.com>
RE: Exceptions or not (Was: RE: ModSAX (SAX 1.1) Proposal) - From: Miles Sabin <msabin@cromwellmedia.co.uk>
Re: Exceptions or not - From: Toby Speight <tms@ansa.co.uk>
URIs as IDs in ModSAX (was Re: ModSAX (SAX 1.1) Proposal) (fwd) - From: Dan Brickley <Daniel.Brickley@bristol.ac.uk>
RE: Exceptions or not (Was: RE: ModSAX (SAX 1.1) Proposal) - From: Jarle Stabell <jarle.stabell@dokpro.uio.no>
Re: ModSAX (SAX 1.1) Proposal (fwd) - From: Dan Brickley <Daniel.Brickley@bristol.ac.uk>
Exceptions or not (Was: RE: ModSAX (SAX 1.1) Proposal) - From: David Megginson <david@megginson.com>
RE: ModSAX (SAX 1.1) Proposal - From: David Megginson <david@megginson.com>
Exceptions or not (Was: RE: ModSAX (SAX 1.1) Proposal) - From: Jarle Stabell <jarle.stabell@dokpro.uio.no>
RXP 1.0 released - From: Richard Tobin <richard@cogsci.ed.ac.uk>
RE: ModSAX (SAX 1.1) Proposal - From: "Ingargiola, Tito" <ti64877@imcnam.sbi.com>
RE: XML conferences in the UK - From: "Livingstone, Stephen" <Livinsb@rbos.co.uk>
Re: ModSAX (SAX 1.1) Proposal - From: Tyler Baker <tyler@infinet.com>
Re: XML conferences in the UK - From: Robin Cover <robin@isogen.com>
Why SAX doesn't have a requirements document (was Re: ModSAX (SAX 1.1) Proposal) - From: David Megginson <david@megginson.com>
from a new member - From: Prashanth Lakshmi Narayanan <PrashanthL@inf.com>
XML conferences in the UK - From: Kaustav Bhattacharya <k.bhattacharya@bbc.co.uk>
Re: ModSAX (SAX 1.1) Proposal - From: David Megginson <david@megginson.com>
RE: ModSAX (SAX 1.1) Proposal - From: David Megginson <david@megginson.com>
XML 1.0 Errata, one year later - From: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
No subject given - From: "Joseph DeArce" <jdearce@tiaa-cref.org>
FW: Namespaces - From: Serrat Jaime - jasr <jasr@im.se>
XML Schema Requirements out - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>
attaching files - From: jayadeva@lgsi.co.in (Jayadeva Babu Gali)
xml-dev Digest V1 #242 - From: "Oren Ben-Kiki" <oren@capella.co.il>
servlet/xml/xsl - From: jayadeva@lgsi.co.in (Jayadeva Babu Gali)
RE: DOM vs. SAX??? Nah. (was RE: Storing Lots of Fiddly Bits (was Re: What is XML for?) - From: Michael.Kay@icl.com
ANNOUNCING SAXON 4.0 - From: Michael.Kay@icl.com
Re: ModSAX (SAX 1.1) Proposal - From: Tyler Baker <tyler@infinet.com>
Re: Valid RDF and security - From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@allette.com.au>
Re: ModSAX (SAX 1.1) Proposal - From: Clark Evans <clark.evans@manhattanproject.com>
Re: ModSAX (SAX 1.1) Proposal - From: "Don Park" <donpark@quake.net>
Re: X3D - From: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
X3D - From: len bullard <cbullard@hiwaay.net>
RE: ModSAX (SAX 1.1) Proposal - From: Jarle Stabell <jarle.stabell@dokpro.uio.no>
ModSAX (SAX 1.1) Proposal - From: David Megginson <david@megginson.com>
Re: Roll-Your-Own Parsers - From: roddey@us.ibm.com
Re: Valid RDF and security - From: Paul Prescod <paul@prescod.net>
Re: Announcement: DocZilla Preview and all-new Demo Kit - From: Michael Leventhal <mlelist@citec.fi>
Valid RDF and security - From: Robb Shecter <shecter@darmstadt.gmd.de>
Re: Announcement: DocZilla Preview and all-new Demo Kit - From: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
Re: Announcement: DocZilla Preview and all-new Demo Kit - From: Robb Shecter <shecter@darmstadt.gmd.de>
Re: Announcement: DocZilla Preview and all-new Demo Kit - From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@metalab.unc.edu>
Re: xml-dev Digest V1 #242 - From: keshlam@us.ibm.com
Announcement: DocZilla Preview and all-new Demo Kit - From: Mirja Hukari <mirja.hukari@citec.fi>
Suggestions for clean-specs (was: Clean specs) - From: MikeDacon@aol.com
XML Data Structure ... - From: David Megginson <david@megginson.com>
Re: ? DOM committee to "address this issue"? [Re: The Peace Process: DOM and namespaces...] - From: Tyler Baker <tyler@infinet.com>
Re: Ms. Manners - From: "Don Park" <donpark@quake.net>
? DOM committee to "address this issue"? [Re: The Peace Process: DOM and namespaces...] - From: james anderson <James.Anderson@mecomnet.de>
XML Data Structure ... - From: "Dinesh Vadhia" <dineshv@email.msn.com>
SAX2 (was Re: DOM vs. SAX??? Nah. ) - From: "Bill la Forge" <b.laforge@jxml.com>
Fw: DOM vs. SAX??? Nah. (was RE: Storing Lots of Fiddly Bits (was Re: What is XML for?) - From: "Oren Ben-Kiki" <oren@capella.co.il>
Re: Roll-Your-Own Parsers - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>
Advantages of XML and SGML - From: Clark Evans <clark.evans@manhattanproject.com>
RE: The Peace Process: DOM and namespaces... - From: Chris Lovett <clovett@microsoft.com>
Ms. Manners - From: roddey@us.ibm.com
Re: Roll-Your-Own Parsers (was: Re: What Clean Specs Achieve) - From: roddey@us.ibm.com
InheritanceFilter improved - From: John Cowan <cowan@locke.ccil.org>
re: RDF, Namespaces, and Versioning? - From: roddey@us.ibm.com
Re: Slowness of JDK 1.1.x String.intern() [was Re: SAX, Java, and Namespaces ] - From: David Brownell <db@Eng.Sun.COM>
Re: DOM vs. SAX??? Nah. (was RE: Storing Lots of Fiddly Bits (was Re: What is XML for?) - From: "Don Park" <donpark@quake.net>
Re: DOM vs. SAX??? Nah. (was RE: Storing Lots of Fiddly Bits (was Re: What is XML for?) - From: Clark Evans <clark.evans@manhattanproject.com>
Re: The Peace Process: DOM and namespaces... - From: "Bill la Forge" <b.laforge@jxml.com>
Re: Slowness of JDK 1.1.x String.intern() [was Re: SAX, Java, and Namespaces ] - From: james anderson <James.Anderson@mecomnet.de>
Re: DOM vs. SAX??? Nah. (was RE: Storing Lots of Fiddly Bits (was Re: What is XML for?) - From: "Bill la Forge" <b.laforge@jxml.com>
DOM vs. SAX??? Nah. (was RE: Storing Lots of Fiddly Bits (was Re: What is XML for?) - From: David Megginson <david@megginson.com>
Re: The Peace Process: DOM and namespaces... - From: John Cowan <cowan@locke.ccil.org>
Re: trying to understand the roll of XML - From: Jonathan Eisenzopf <eisen@pobox.com>
DOM vs. SAX??? Nah. (was RE: Storing Lots of Fiddly Bits (was Re: What is XML for?) - From: "Oren Ben-Kiki" <oren@capella.co.il>
Re: Slowness of JDK 1.1.x String.intern() [was Re: SAX, Java, and Namespaces ] - From: Tyler Baker <tyler@infinet.com>
Re: Slowness of JDK 1.1.x String.intern() [was Re: SAX, Java, and Namespaces ] - From: David Brownell <db@Eng.Sun.COM>
Re: Roll-Your-Own Parsers (was: Re: What Clean Specs Achieve) - From: David Brownell <db@Eng.Sun.COM>
Re: The Peace Process: DOM and namespaces... - From: Tyler Baker <tyler@infinet.com>
Re: The Peace Process: DOM and namespaces... - From: James Clark <jjc@jclark.com>
Re: The Peace Process: DOM and namespaces... - From: Marcelo Cantos <marcelo@mds.rmit.edu.au>
Re: The Peace Process: DOM and namespaces... - From: "Don Park" <donpark@quake.net>
Re: The Peace Process: DOM and namespaces... - From: Tyler Baker <tyler@infinet.com>
Re: The Peace Process: DOM and namespaces... - From: "Bill la Forge" <b.laforge@jxml.com>
Re: The Peace Process: DOM and namespaces... - From: "Bill la Forge" <b.laforge@jxml.com>
Re: The Peace Process: DOM and namespaces... - From: Tyler Baker <tyler@infinet.com>
Re: The Peace Process: DOM and namespaces... - From: Marcelo Cantos <marcelo@mds.rmit.edu.au>
Re: The Peace Process: DOM and namespaces... - From: Tyler Baker <tyler@infinet.com>
re: DOM vs. SAX??? Nah. - From: David Megginson <david@megginson.com>
Fw: DOM vs. SAX??? Nah. (was RE: Storing Lots of FiddlyBits (was Re: What is XML for?) - From: Clark Evans <clark.evans@manhattanproject.com>
Re: Fw: DOM vs. SAX??? Nah. (was RE: Storing Lots of Fiddly Bits (was Re: What is XML for?) - From: John Cowan <cowan@locke.ccil.org>
Re: Fw: DOM vs. SAX??? Nah. (was RE: Storing Lots of FiddlyBits (was Re: What is XML for?) - From: Clark Evans <clark.evans@manhattanproject.com>
Re: XML Parser with DOM in C - From: keshlam@us.ibm.com
Re: Fw: DOM vs. SAX??? Nah. (was RE: Storing Lots of Fiddly Bits (was Re: What is XML for?) - From: Walter Underwood <wunder@infoseek.com>
RE: The Peace Process: DOM and namespaces... - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>
RE: The Peace Process: DOM and namespaces... - From: Michael.Kay@icl.com
Re: The Peace Process: DOM and namespaces... - From: "Rick Ross" <rick@activated.com>
RE: The Peace Process: DOM and namespaces... - From: "Matthew Sergeant (EML)" <Matthew.Sergeant@eml.ericsson.se>
Re: The Peace Process: DOM and namespaces... - From: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
Re: The Peace Process: DOM and namespaces... - From: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
The Peace Process: DOM and namespaces... - From: keshlam@us.ibm.com
Re: The Peace Process: DOM and namespaces... - From: David Megginson <david@megginson.com>
Schema Muddle (was Quite Standards Questions) - From: David Megginson <david@megginson.com>
Re: The Peace Process: DOM and namespaces... - From: "Rick Ross" <rick@activated.com>
Re: Roll-Your-Own Parsers (was: Re: What Clean Specs Achieve) - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>
Re: The Peace Process: DOM and namespaces... - From: David Megginson <david@megginson.com>
Misattribution (was Re: The Peace Process: DOM and namespaces...) - From: David Megginson <david@megginson.com>
Re: The Peace Process: DOM and namespaces... - From: "Rick Ross" <rick@activated.com>
Re: an initial idea for an XML überdocument shell (was Re: CORBA's not boring yet. / XML in an OS?) - From: David Mohring <heretic@ihug.co.nz>
Re: The Peace Process: DOM and namespaces... - From: "Bill la Forge" <b.laforge@jxml.com>
Re: The Peace Process: DOM and namespaces... - From: Tyler Baker <tyler@infinet.com>
Re: The Peace Process: DOM and namespaces... - From: Tyler Baker <tyler@infinet.com>
Re: The Peace Process: DOM and namespaces... - From: Tyler Baker <tyler@infinet.com>
Re: The Peace Process: DOM and namespaces... - From: Tyler Baker <tyler@infinet.com>
Re: The Peace Process: DOM and namespaces... - From: "Rick Ross" <rick@activated.com>
RE: Quite Standards Questions - From: Ronald Bourret <rbourret@ito.tu-darmstadt.de>
Fw: DOM vs. SAX??? Nah. (was RE: Storing Lots of Fiddly Bits (was Re: What is XML for?) - From: "Oren Ben-Kiki" <oren@capella.co.il>
Quite Standards Questions - From: "Richard Anderson" <rja@arpsolutions.demon.co.uk>
Re: The Peace Process: DOM and namespaces... - From: "Rick Ross" <rick@activated.com>
Re: The Peace Process: DOM and namespaces... - From: "Rick Ross" <rick@activated.com>
Re: The Peace Process: DOM and namespaces... - From: David Megginson <david@megginson.com>
Re: The Peace Process: DOM and namespaces... - From: David Megginson <david@megginson.com>
Re: The Peace Process: DOM and namespaces... - From: David Megginson <david@megginson.com>
DOM vs. SAX??? Nah. (was RE: Storing Lots of Fiddly Bits (was Re: What is XML for?) - From: David Megginson <david@megginson.com>
Re: RDF, Namespaces, and Versioning? - From: David Megginson <david@megginson.com>
Re: Possible enhancements to Namespaces to allow valiadation - From: james anderson <James.Anderson@mecomnet.de>
RE: Word and XML (was: XML standards coherency and so forth) - From: Tony McDonald <tony.mcdonald@ncl.ac.uk>
Re: The Peace Process: DOM and namespaces... - From: James Clark <jjc@jclark.com>
Re: dynamically XML - From: "Steve Muench" <SMUENCH@us.oracle.com>
Re: The Peace Process: DOM and namespaces... - From: Tyler Baker <tyler@infinet.com>
dynamically XML - From: jayadeva@lgsi.co.in (Jayadeva Babu Gali)
Re: The Peace Process: DOM and namespaces... - From: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
Re: Roll-Your-Own Parsers (was: Re: What Clean Specs Achieve) - From: Tyler Baker <tyler@infinet.com>
Re: The Peace Process: DOM and namespaces... - From: Tyler Baker <tyler@infinet.com>
Re: The Peace Process: DOM and namespaces... - From: Tyler Baker <tyler@infinet.com>
Re: The Peace Process: DOM and namespaces... - From: Tyler Baker <tyler@infinet.com>
Re: The Peace Process: DOM and namespaces... - From: Tyler Baker <tyler@infinet.com>
Re: The Peace Process: DOM and namespaces... - From: Tyler Baker <tyler@infinet.com>
Re: The Peace Process: DOM and namespaces... - From: James Clark <jjc@jclark.com>
Re: Roll-Your-Own Parsers (was: Re: What Clean Specs Achieve) - From: "Bill la Forge" <b.laforge@jxml.com>
Re: The Peace Process: DOM and namespaces... - From: "Bill la Forge" <b.laforge@jxml.com>
Re: The Peace Process: DOM and namespaces... - From: "Don Park" <donpark@quake.net>
RE: The Peace Process: DOM and namespaces... - From: Andrew Layman <andrewl@microsoft.com>
Re: The Peace Process: DOM and namespaces... - From: Rob Schoening <rschoening@unforgettable.com>
Re: The Peace Process: DOM and namespaces... - From: "Don Park" <donpark@quake.net>
Possible enhancements to Namespaces to allow valiadation - From: <Marc.McDonald@Design-Intelligence.com>
Re: The Peace Process: DOM and namespaces... - From: Tyler Baker <tyler@infinet.com>
Re: The Peace Process: DOM and namespaces... - From: Tyler Baker <tyler@infinet.com>
Re: The Peace Process: DOM and namespaces... - From: Tyler Baker <tyler@infinet.com>
RE: Storing Lots of Fiddly Bits (was Re: What is XML for?) - From: keshlam@us.ibm.com
Re: The Peace Process: DOM and namespaces... - From: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
Re: The Peace Process: DOM and namespaces... - From: David Megginson <david@megginson.com>
Re: The Peace Process: DOM and namespaces... - From: David Megginson <david@megginson.com>
Re: The Peace Process: DOM and namespaces... - From: Tyler Baker <tyler@infinet.com>
Re: The Peace Process: DOM and namespaces... - From: "Rick Ross" <rick@activated.com>
Re: The Peace Process: DOM and namespaces... - From: "Rick Ross" <rick@activated.com>
RE: what is "completely different" [Re: RDF, Namespaces, and Versioning?] - From: Andrew Layman <andrewl@microsoft.com>
re: The Peace Process: DOM and namespaces... - From: David Megginson <david@megginson.com>
Re: The Peace Process: DOM and namespaces... - From: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
The Peace Process: DOM and namespaces... - From: "Rick Ross" <rick@activated.com>
Re: Roll-Your-Own Parsers (was: Re: What Clean Specs Achieve) - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>
what is "completely different" [Re: RDF, Namespaces, and Versioning?] - From: David Megginson <david@megginson.com>
what is "completely different" [Re: RDF, Namespaces, and Versioning?] - From: james anderson <James.Anderson@mecomnet.de>
Architectural Forms and Namespaces (Was: Re: SAX, Java, and Namespaces ) - From: David Megginson <david@megginson.com>
RE: Word and XML (was: XML standards coherency and so forth) - From: "Biron,Paul V" <Paul.V.Biron@kp.ORG>
Re: RDF, Namespaces, and Versioning? - From: "James Tauber" <jtauber@jtauber.com>
Re: XML Parser with DOM in C - From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@allette.com.au>
Re: RDF, Namespaces, and Versioning? - From: Clark Evans <clark.evans@manhattanproject.com>
Re: XML Parser with DOM in C - From: "Richard Anderson" <rja@arpsolutions.demon.co.uk>
RE: XML Parser with DOM in C - From: "Matthew Sergeant (EML)" <Matthew.Sergeant@eml.ericsson.se>
re: RDF, Namespaces, and Versioning? - From: David Megginson <david@megginson.com>
Roll-Your-Own Parsers (was: Re: What Clean Specs Achieve) - From: hpyle@agora.co.uk
RE: "Namespaces in XML" idea? - From: Michael.Kay@icl.com
Fractal XML Index Notation - From: Clark Evans <clark.evans@manhattanproject.com>
Re: What Clean Specs Achieve - From: Tyler Baker <tyler@infinet.com>
ANN: IBM XML Parser for Java (XML4J) v2.0.0 - From: TAMURA Kent <kent@trl.ibm.co.jp>
Namespace Registry? And what about Architectures? - From: Clark Evans <clark.evans@manhattanproject.com>
Re: Storing Lots of Fiddly Bits (was Re: What is XML for?) - From: uche.ogbuji@fourthought.com
RDF, Namespaces, and Versioning? - From: Clark Evans <clark.evans@manhattanproject.com>
Re: What Clean Specs Achieve - From: roddey@us.ibm.com
Bluestone XML Product Family - From: "Atkins, Jon" <jatkins@Bluestone.com>
Re: "Namespaces in XML" idea? - From: David Megginson <david@megginson.com>
Re: URL: 19 Short Questions about Namespaces (with Answers) - From: Tyler Baker <tyler@infinet.com>
Re: "Namespaces in XML" idea? - From: Tyler Baker <tyler@infinet.com>
Re: "Namespaces in XML" idea? - From: Tyler Baker <tyler@infinet.com>
Re: Storing Lots of Fiddly Bits (was Re: What is XML for?) - From: Paul Prescod <paul@prescod.net>
Data Model Patterns (Was: Groves and Architectural Forms) - From: Clark Evans <clark.evans@manhattanproject.com>
Re: URL: 19 Short Questions about Namespaces (with Answers) - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>
Re: HTML, XML, XML-RPC in one net app - From: Deke Smith <deke@tallent.com>
Re: "Namespaces in XML" idea? - From: James Clark <jjc@jclark.com>
RE: "Namespaces in XML" idea? - From: David Megginson <david@megginson.com>
RE: "Namespaces in XML" idea? - From: Dan Brickley <Daniel.Brickley@bristol.ac.uk>
RE: "Namespaces in XML" idea? - From: Ronald Bourret <rbourret@ito.tu-darmstadt.de>
Re: "Namespaces in XML" idea? - From: Lars Marius Garshol <larsga@ifi.uio.no>
Re: "Clean Specs" - From: Jack Park <jackpark@thinkalong.com>
OS-XML was: Re: CORBA's not boring yet. / XML in an OS? - From: Jack Park <jackpark@thinkalong.com>
RE: "Clean Specs" - From: "Lauren Wood" <lauren@sqwest.bc.ca>
Re: Fw: "Clean Specs" - From: "Lauren Wood" <lauren@sqwest.bc.ca>
RE: Storing Lots of Fiddly Bits (was Re: What is XML for?) - From: "Borden, Jonathan" <jborden@mediaone.net>
Re: Storing Lots of Fiddly Bits (was Re: What is XML for?) - From: uche.ogbuji@fourthought.com
RE: Storing Lots of Fiddly Bits (was Re: What is XML for?) - From: "Borden, Jonathan" <jborden@mediaone.net>
Re: URL: 19 Short Questions about Namespaces (with Answers) - From: James Clark <jjc@jclark.com>
Re: Fw: "Clean Specs" - From: "Don Park" <donpark@quake.net>
Re: "Clean Specs" - From: "Frank Boumphrey" <bckman@ix.netcom.com>
"Namespaces in XML" idea? - From: Tyler Baker <tyler@infinet.com>
Re: Storing Lots of Fiddly Bits (was Re: What is XML for?) - From: Marcelo Cantos <marcelo@mds.rmit.edu.au>
Re: Storing Lots of Fiddly Bits (was Re: What is XML for?) - From: "Steven R. Newcomb" <srn@techno.com>
RE: What Clean Specs Achieve, WAS: Colonialism, SAX, Java, and Namespaces - From: Mark Birbeck <Mark.Birbeck@iedigital.net>
RE: What Clean Specs Achieve, WAS: Colonialism, SAX, Java, and Namespaces - From: Daniel Austin <daniela@cnet.com>
RE: What Clean Specs Achieve, WAS: Colonialism, SAX, Java, and Namespaces - From: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
RE: What Clean Specs Achieve, WAS: Colonialism, SAX, Java, and Namespaces - From: Mark Birbeck <Mark.Birbeck@iedigital.net>
Re: "Clean Specs" - From: Marcus Carr <mrc@allette.com.au>
Re: URL: 19 Short Questions about Namespaces (with Answers) - From: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
RE: What Clean Specs Achieve, WAS: Colonialism, SAX, Java, and Namespaces - From: Rob Schoening <rschoening@unforgettable.com>
RE: "Clean Specs" - From: "Buss, Jason A" <jabuss@cessna.textron.com>
Re: Fw: "Clean Specs" - From: John Cowan <cowan@locke.ccil.org>
URL: 19 Short Questions about Namespaces (with Answers) - From: David Megginson <david@megginson.com>
Fw: "Clean Specs" - From: "Oren Ben-Kiki" <oren@capella.co.il>
Re: A New Hope (was Re: Storing Lots of Fiddly Bits (was Re: What is XML for?)) - From: spreitze@parc.xerox.com
RE: What Clean Specs Achieve, WAS: Colonialism, SAX, Java, and Namespaces - From: Mark Birbeck <Mark.Birbeck@iedigital.net>
RE: XDK - From: "Jeffrey E. Sussna" <jes@kuantech.com>
Re: XDK - From: "Don Park" <donpark@quake.net>
XML Parser with DOM in C - From: "David E. Cleary" <davec@progress.com>
Re: Fw: "Clean Specs" - From: Tyler Baker <tyler@infinet.com>
Re: Fw: Fw: "Clean Specs" - From: Tyler Baker <tyler@infinet.com>
Re: What Clean Specs Achieve, WAS: Colonialism, SAX, Java, and Namespaces - From: Clark Evans <clark.evans@manhattanproject.com>
XDK - From: Clark Evans <clark.evans@manhattanproject.com>
RE: What Clean Specs Achieve, WAS: Colonialism, SAX, Java, and Namespaces - From: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
Re: What Clean Specs Achieve, WAS: Colonialism, SAX, Java, and Namespaces - From: John Cowan <cowan@locke.ccil.org>
XML-RPC & HTTP-NG (was A critique of XML-RPC) - From: "Ingargiola, Tito" <ti64877@imcnam.sbi.com>
RE: What Clean Specs Achieve, WAS: Colonialism, SAX, Java, and Namespaces - From: Rob Schoening <rschoening@unforgettable.com>
Fw: Fw: "Clean Specs" - From: "Oren Ben-Kiki" <oren@capella.co.il>
Re: Fw: "Clean Specs" - From: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
Re: Fw: "Clean Specs" - From: Tyler Baker <tyler@infinet.com>
Re: Storing Lots of Fiddly Bits (was Re: What is XML for?) - From: Paul Prescod <paul@prescod.net>
DOM API - From: Paul Prescod <paul@prescod.net>
RE: When to use attributes vs. elements - From: Andrew Layman <andrewl@microsoft.com>
RE: What Clean Specs Achieve, WAS: Colonialism, SAX, Java, and Namespaces - From: peter@weblogic.com (Peter Seibel)
Re: Storing Lots of Fiddly Bits (was Re: What is XML for?) - From: Paul Prescod <paul@prescod.net>
Re: Storing Lots of Fiddly Bits (was Re: What is XML for?) - From: Clark Evans <clark.evans@manhattanproject.com>
Fw: "Clean Specs" - From: "Oren Ben-Kiki" <oren@capella.co.il>
Re: Storing Lots of Fiddly Bits (was Re: What is XML for?) - From: Paul Prescod <paul@prescod.net>
Re: A New Hope (was Re: Storing Lots of Fiddly Bits (was Re: What is XML for?)) - From: spreitze@parc.xerox.com
Re: document vs non-document entity (was Re: CORBA's not boring yet. / XML in an OS?) - From: Paul Prescod <paul@prescod.net>
an initial idea for an XML überdocument shell (was Re: CORBA's not boring yet. / XML in an OS?) - From: "James Tauber" <jtauber@jtauber.com>
Clear specs: Audience - From: Clark Evans <clark.evans@manhattanproject.com>
Re: Clear specs: suggestions - From: "John E. Simpson" <simpson@polaris.net>
Re: "Clean Specs" - From: Avi Rappoport <avirr@LanMinds.Com>
Re: CORBA's not boring yet. / XML in an OS? - From: "Fredrik Lindgren" <f.lindgren@upright.se>
Re: Clear specs: suggestions - From: "Frank Boumphrey" <bckman@ix.netcom.com>
Re: "Clean Specs" - From: Tyler Baker <tyler@infinet.com>
Re: "Clean Specs" - From: "Lauren Wood" <lauren@sqwest.bc.ca>
Re: CORBA's not boring yet. / XML in an OS? - From: Robb Shecter <shecter@darmstadt.gmd.de>
Re: "Clean Specs" - From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@allette.com.au>
Re: CORBA's not boring yet. / XML in an OS? - From: Tyler Baker <tyler@infinet.com>
"Clean Specs" - From: <JEROME.YUROW@hq.doe.gov>
[corrected] 19 Short Questions about Namespaces (with Answers) - From: David Megginson <david@megginson.com>
RE: Colonialism, SAX, Java, and Namespaces - From: Ron Daniel <RDaniel@DATAFUSION.net>
Clear specs: suggestions - From: "John E. Simpson" <simpson@polaris.net>
19 Short Questions about Namespaces (with Answers) - From: David Megginson <david@megginson.com>
Re: CORBA's not boring yet. / XML in an OS? - From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@allette.com.au>
Re: problem - From: Shekhar Kshirsagar <skshirsa@nortelnetworks.com>
Re: "Clean Specs" - From: David Megginson <david@megginson.com>
Announcement: 4DOM 0.7.0 - From: uche.ogbuji@fourthought.com
Re: "Clean Specs" - From: james anderson <James.Anderson@mecomnet.de>
Re: document vs non-document entity (was Re: CORBA's not boring yet. / XML in an OS?) - From: james anderson <James.Anderson@mecomnet.de>
problem - From: jayadeva@lgsi.co.in (Jayadeva Babu Gali)
RE: When to use attributes vs. elements - From: Dan Brickley <Daniel.Brickley@bristol.ac.uk>
RE: "Clean Specs" - From: Ronald Bourret <rbourret@ito.tu-darmstadt.de>
RE: "Clean Specs" - From: Ronald Bourret <rbourret@ito.tu-darmstadt.de>
Re: CORBA's not boring yet. / XML in an OS? - From: Robb Shecter <shecter@darmstadt.gmd.de>
Re: CORBA's not boring yet. / XML in an OS? - From: Robb Shecter <shecter@darmstadt.gmd.de>
Little problem with namespace - From: "Buster Blues" <busterdeniro@hotmail.com>
Re: Component Markup Language - From: Robb Shecter <shecter@darmstadt.gmd.de>
Re: Component Markup Language - From: Robb Shecter <shecter@darmstadt.gmd.de>
Re: "Clean Specs" - From: Tyler Baker <tyler@infinet.com>
RE: "Clean Specs" - From: Murray Maloney <murray@muzmo.com>
Re: "Clean Specs" - From: Murray Maloney <murray@muzmo.com>
Re: "Clean Specs" - From: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
RE: Storing Lots of Fiddly Bits (was Re: What is XML for?) - From: "Borden, Jonathan" <jborden@mediaone.net>
Re: "Clean Specs" - From: Tyler Baker <tyler@infinet.com>
Re: Storing Lots of Fiddly Bits (was Re: What is XML for?) - From: uche.ogbuji@fourthought.com
RE: "Clean Specs" - From: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
RE: Storing Lots of Fiddly Bits (was Re: What is XML for?) - From: "W. Eliot Kimber" <eliot@dns.isogen.com>
Re: "Clean Specs" - From: John Cowan <cowan@locke.ccil.org>
RE: "Clean Specs" - From: Murray Maloney <murray@muzmo.com>
Re: Storing Lots of Fiddly Bits (was Re: What is XML for?) - From: "Bill la Forge" <b.laforge@jxml.com>
RE: Storing Lots of Fiddly Bits (was Re: What is XML for?) - From: "Borden, Jonathan" <jborden@mediaone.net>
Re: Storing Lots of Fiddly Bits (was Re: What is XML for?) - From: uche.ogbuji@fourthought.com
Re: "Clean Specs" - From: uche.ogbuji@fourthought.com
Re: "Clean Specs" - From: "Don Park" <donpark@quake.net>
Re: "Clean Specs" - From: uche.ogbuji@fourthought.com
RE: "Clean Specs" - From: "Borden, Jonathan" <jborden@mediaone.net>
Re: "Clean Specs" - From: Murray Maloney <murray@muzmo.com>
XML e-mail viewer was RE: CORBA's not boring yet. / XML in an OS? - From: "Borden, Jonathan" <jborden@mediaone.net>
Re: "Clean Specs" - From: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
Re: RDF (was Re: Colonialism, SAX, Java, and Namespaces) - From: Paul Prescod <paul@prescod.net>
Re: "Clean Specs" - From: "Frank Boumphrey" <bckman@ix.netcom.com>
Re: "Clean Specs" - From: "Don Park" <donpark@quake.net>
Re: Storing Lots of Fiddly Bits (was Re: What is XML for?) - From: Marcelo Cantos <marcelo@mds.rmit.edu.au>
Re: "Clean Specs" - From: "W. Eliot Kimber" <eliot@dns.isogen.com>
Re: "Clean Specs" - From: "W. Eliot Kimber" <eliot@dns.isogen.com>
Re: "Clean Specs" - From: Murray Maloney <murray@muzmo.com>
Re: "Clean Specs" - From: "Liam R. E. Quin" <liamquin@interlog.com>
Re: "Clean Specs" - From: James Robertson <jamesr@steptwo.com.au>
Re: RDF (was Re: Colonialism, SAX, Java, and Namespaces) - From: James Robertson <jamesr@steptwo.com.au>
Re: "Clean Specs" - From: James Robertson <jamesr@steptwo.com.au>
Re: "Clean Specs" - From: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
Re: "Clean Specs" - From: "W. Eliot Kimber" <eliot@dns.isogen.com>
Re: "Clean Specs" - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>
Re: "Clean Specs" - From: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
Re: DTD: Extra Complexity? - From: Paul Prescod <paul@prescod.net>
XSL and namespaces - From: Paul Prescod <paul@prescod.net>
Re: document vs non-document entity (was Re: CORBA's not boring yet. / XML in an OS?) - From: "James Tauber" <jtauber@jtauber.com>
Re: DTD: Extra Complexity? - From: "Steven R. Newcomb" <srn@techno.com>
Re: "Clean Specs" - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>
Re: Extra Complexity? - From: Jeff Greif <jmg@trivida.com>
RE: "Clean Specs" - From: "Borden, Jonathan" <jborden@mediaone.net>
Re: RDF (was Re: Colonialism, SAX, Java, and Namespaces) - From: Paul Prescod <paul@prescod.net>
Re: Extra Complexity? - From: Paul Prescod <paul@prescod.net>
Re: document vs non-document entity (was Re: CORBA's not boring yet. / XML in an OS?) - From: Paul Prescod <paul@prescod.net>
"Clean Specs" - From: Paul Prescod <paul@prescod.net>
Re: Namespace Applications - From: james anderson <James.Anderson@mecomnet.de>
Re: document vs non-document entity (was Re: CORBA's not boring yet. / XML in an OS?) - From: james anderson <James.Anderson@mecomnet.de>
Re: Namespaces and DTDs was RE: Namespaces and interoperability (was Re: SAX, Java, and Namespaces) - From: james anderson <James.Anderson@mecomnet.de>
Re: A critique of XML-RPC - From: Dave Winer <dave@userland.com>
Re: document vs non-document entity (was Re: CORBA's not boring yet. / XML in an OS?) - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>
document vs non-document entity (was Re: CORBA's not boring yet. / XML in an OS?) - From: "James Tauber" <jtauber@jtauber.com>
CORBA's not boring yet. / XML in an OS? - From: "Oren Ben-Kiki" <oren@capella.co.il>
Re: What Clean Specs Achieve - From: uche.ogbuji@fourthought.com
Re: What Clean Specs Achieve, WAS: Colonialism, SAX, Java, and Na mespaces - From: uche.ogbuji@fourthought.com
Re: CORBA's not boring yet. / XML in an OS? - From: "James Tauber" <jtauber@jtauber.com>
Re: Component Markup Language - From: "James Tauber" <jtauber@jtauber.com>
Re: CORBA's not boring yet. / XML in an OS? - From: uche.ogbuji@fourthought.com
RE: What Clean Specs Achieve - From: "Borden, Jonathan" <jborden@mediaone.net>
A critique of XML-RPC - From: John Cowan <cowan@locke.ccil.org>
Re: Extra Complexity? - From: "Frank Boumphrey" <bckman@ix.netcom.com>
Namespaces and DTDs was RE: Namespaces and interoperability (was Re: SAX, Java, and Namespaces) - From: "Borden, Jonathan" <jborden@mediaone.net>
RDF (was Re: Colonialism, SAX, Java, and Namespaces) - From: James Robertson <jamesr@steptwo.com.au>
Average developers (was Re: Colonialism, SAX, Java, and Namespaces) - From: James Robertson <jamesr@steptwo.com.au>
Namespaces and interoperability (was Re: SAX, Java, and Namespaces) - From: James Robertson <jamesr@steptwo.com.au>
MDSAX beta2 includes filters for namespace and architectural forms - From: "Bill la Forge" <b.laforge@jxml.com>
Re: Extra Complexity? - From: John Cowan <cowan@locke.ccil.org>
Re: Extra Complexity? - From: "Samuel R. Blackburn" <sblackbu@erols.com>
Re: DTD: Extra Complexity? - From: Clark Evans <clark.evans@manhattanproject.com>
DTD: Extra Complexity? - From: "Dan Holle" <dan@holle.demon.co.uk>
What is XML? (Was: Re: What Clean Specs Achieve) - From: Clark Evans <clark.evans@manhattanproject.com>
Re: What Clean Specs Achieve - From: Clark Evans <clark.evans@manhattanproject.com>
ANN: xmlproc 0.60 - From: Lars Marius Garshol <larsga@ifi.uio.no>
RE: What Clean Specs Achieve - From: Mark Birbeck <Mark.Birbeck@iedigital.net>
RE: What Clean Specs Achieve - From: Mark Birbeck <Mark.Birbeck@iedigital.net>
Re: What Clean Specs Achieve - From: Tyler Baker <tyler@infinet.com>
RE: What Clean Specs Achieve - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>
Re: What Clean Specs Achieve - From: james anderson <James.Anderson@mecomnet.de>
Re: Namespace Applications - From: Gabe Beged-Dov <begeddov@jfinity.com>
RE: What Clean Specs Achieve - From: Mark Birbeck <Mark.Birbeck@iedigital.net>
Re: What Clean Specs Achieve - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>
Namespace Applications - From: Paul Prescod <paul@prescod.net>
Re: What Clean Specs Achieve - From: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
Re: COBOL XML parser? - From: james anderson <James.Anderson@mecomnet.de>
Re: What Clean Specs Achieve - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>
RE: What Clean Specs Achieve, WAS: Colonialism, SAX, Java, and Namespaces - From: Mark Birbeck <Mark.Birbeck@iedigital.net>
Re: Colonialism, SAX, Java, and Namespaces - From: "Bill la Forge" <b.laforge@jxml.com>
Re: Colonialism, SAX, Java, and Namespaces - From: "Frank Boumphrey" <bckman@ix.netcom.com>
What Clean Specs Achieve, WAS: Colonialism, SAX, Java, and Namespaces - From: "Bill la Forge" <b.laforge@jxml.com>
Re: Colonialism, SAX, Java, and Namespaces - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>
Re: Colonialism, SAX, Java, and Namespaces - From: Paul Prescod <paul@prescod.net>
RE: When to use attributes vs. elements - From: Andrew Layman <andrewl@microsoft.com>
Re: Colonialism, SAX, Java, and Namespaces - From: Tyler Baker <tyler@infinet.com>
Re: Slowness of JDK 1.1.x String.intern() [was Re: SAX, Java,and Namespaces ] - From: Tyler Baker <tyler@infinet.com>
RE: Namespaces does *not* formally introduce "global attributes" - From: Mark Birbeck <Mark.Birbeck@iedigital.net>
Re: Namespaces does *not* formally introduce "global attributes" - From: Tyler Baker <tyler@infinet.com>
Re: SAX, Java, and Namespaces (was Re: Restricted NamespacesforXML) - From: Paul Prescod <paul@prescod.net>
Re: Colonialism, SAX, Java, and Namespaces - From: Paul Prescod <paul@prescod.net>
Re: Architectural Forms and Namespaces (Was: Re: SAX, Java, and Namespaces ) - From: "W. Eliot Kimber" <eliot@dns.isogen.com>
Re: Colonialism, SAX, Java, and Namespaces - From: Avi Rappoport <avirr@LanMinds.Com>
RE: CORBA's not boring yet. / XML in an OS? - From: "Jeffrey E. Sussna" <jes@kuantech.com>
Re: Slowness of JDK 1.1.x String.intern() [was Re: SAX, Java, and Namespaces ] - From: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
Slowness of JDK 1.1.x String.intern() [was Re: SAX, Java, and Namespaces ] - From: "Jeff Greif" <jmg@trivida.com>
Namespaces for "average programmers" - From: Paul Prescod <paul@prescod.net>
RE: Colonialism, SAX, Java, and Namespaces - From: Mark Birbeck <Mark.Birbeck@iedigital.net>
Re: Colonialism, SAX, Java, and Namespaces - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>
Re: When to use attributes vs. elements - From: "G. Ken Holman" <gkholman@CraneSoftwrights.com>
RE: When to use attributes vs. elements - From: Dan Brickley <Daniel.Brickley@bristol.ac.uk>
Architectural Forms and Namespaces (Was: Re: SAX, Java, and Namespaces ) - From: Clark Evans <clark.evans@manhattanproject.com>
Re: SAX, Java, and Namespaces (was Re: Restricted Namespaces forXML) - From: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
Re: COBOL XML parser? - From: Lars Marius Garshol <larsga@ifi.uio.no>
Re: Colonialism, SAX, Java, and Namespaces - From: David Megginson <david@megginson.com>
RE: When to use attributes vs. elements - From: Andrew Layman <andrewl@microsoft.com>
Re: When to use attributes vs. elements - From: "John E. Simpson" <simpson@polaris.net>
RE: Colonialism, SAX, Java, and Namespaces - From: Ronald Bourret <rbourret@ito.tu-darmstadt.de>
Re: Colonialism, SAX, Java, and Namespaces - From: Jerome McDonough <jmcdonou@library.berkeley.edu>
Re: A weaker XSL? - From: Paul Prescod <paul@prescod.net>
XML Spy v1.4 released - From: "Falk, Alexander" <falk@icon.at>
Re: SAX, Java, and Namespaces (was Re: Restricted Namespaces forXML) - From: David Megginson <david@megginson.com>
RE: Namespaces does *not* formally introduce "global attributes" - From: Mark Birbeck <Mark.Birbeck@iedigital.net>
FW: MSXML 1.0 - From: Charles Gamble <Charles.Gamble@singularity.co.uk>
SAXON (Was: Re: A weaker XSL?) - From: Clark Evans <clark.evans@manhattanproject.com>
Re: Colonialism, SAX, Java, and Namespaces - From: Paul Prescod <paul@prescod.net>
MSXML 1.0 - From: Charles Gamble <Charles.Gamble@singularity.co.uk>
Re: Colonialism, SAX, Java, and Namespaces - From: Dave Winer <dave@userland.com>
When to use attributes vs. elements - From: peter@weblogic.com (Peter Seibel)
Re: A weaker XSL? - From: Clark Evans <clark.evans@manhattanproject.com>
Re: A New Hope (was Re: Storing Lots of Fiddly Bits (was Re: What is XML for?)) - From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@allette.com.au>
Re: A weaker XSL? - From: Clark Evans <clark.evans@manhattanproject.com>
RE: SAX, Java, and Namespaces (was Re: Restricted Namespaces forXML) - From: "Borden, Jonathan" <jborden@mediaone.net>
Re: Colonialism, SAX, Java, and Namespaces - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>
Re: Colonialism, SAX, Java, and Namespaces - From: Paul Prescod <paul@prescod.net>
Re: SAX, Java, and Namespaces (was Re: Restricted NamespacesforXML) - From: Paul Prescod <paul@prescod.net>
Re: Fw: Namespaces does *not* formally introduce "global attributes" - From: james anderson <James.Anderson@mecomnet.de>
Colonialism, SAX, Java, and Namespaces - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>
Re: Component Markup Language - From: "Frank Boumphrey" <bckman@ix.netcom.com>
New XML Resources page (Re: Using XSL as a Validation Language) - From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@allette.com.au>
Re: A weaker XSL? - From: Paul Prescod <paul@prescod.net>
Re: SAX, Java, and Namespaces (was Re: Restricted Namespaces forXML) - From: hpyle@agora.co.uk
RE: A weaker XSL? - From: Michael.Kay@icl.com
HTML, XML, XML-RPC in one net app - From: Dave Winer <dave@userland.com>
'How to unsubscribe?' information is attached to every mail. - From: Shekhar Kshirsagar <skshirsa@nortelnetworks.com>
RE: A weaker XSL? - From: "Matthew Sergeant (EML)" <Matthew.Sergeant@eml.ericsson.se>
Re: SAX, Java, and Namespaces (was Re: Restricted Namespaces forXML) - From: Paul Prescod <paul@prescod.net>
RE: Namespaces does *not* formally introduce "global attributes" - From: David Megginson <david@megginson.com>
Re: A weaker XSL? - From: Paul Prescod <paul@prescod.net>
RE: Namespaces does *not* formally introduce "global attributes" - From: Mark Birbeck <Mark.Birbeck@iedigital.net>
Re: SAX, Java, and Namespaces (was Re: Restricted Namespaces for XML) - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>
No Subject - From: "Benedetto, Christopher" <CBenedet@Bluestone.com>
Re: CORBA's not boring yet. / XML in an OS? - From: Daniel Veillard <Daniel.Veillard@w3.org>
RE: CORBA's not boring yet. / XML in an OS? - From: Dave Winer <dave@userland.com>
RE: Namespace clashes? - From: Ronald Bourret <rbourret@ito.tu-darmstadt.de>
RE: Component Markup Language - From: "Matthew Sergeant (EML)" <Matthew.Sergeant@eml.ericsson.se>
RE: CORBA's not boring yet. / XML in an OS? - From: "Matthew Sergeant (EML)" <Matthew.Sergeant@eml.ericsson.se>
Fw: Namespaces does *not* formally introduce "global attributes" - From: "Oren Ben-Kiki" <oren@capella.co.il>
RE: A weaker XSL? - From: "Matthew Sergeant (EML)" <Matthew.Sergeant@eml.ericsson.se>
RE: CORBA's not boring yet. / XML in an OS? - From: "Matthew Sergeant (EML)" <Matthew.Sergeant@eml.ericsson.se>
Re: SAX, Java, and Namespaces (was Re: Restricted Namespaces for XML) - From: hpyle@agora.co.uk
Re: Component Markup Language - From: matt@veosystems.com
Re: Storing Lots of Fiddly Bits (was Re: What is XML for?) - From: Paul Prescod <paul@prescod.net>
Re: Storing Lots of Fiddly Bits (was Re: What is XML for?) - From: Clark Evans <clark.evans@manhattanproject.com>
RE: Storing Lots of Fiddly Bits (was Re: What is XML for?) - From: "Borden, Jonathan" <jborden@mediaone.net>
HDBMS vs RDBMS (Was: Re: Storing Lots of Fiddly Bits (was Re: What is XML for?)) - From: Clark Evans <clark.evans@manhattanproject.com>
RE: Storing Lots of Fiddly Bits (was Re: What is XML for?) - From: "Borden, Jonathan" <jborden@mediaone.net>
Re: Component Markup Language - From: len bullard <cbullard@hiwaay.net>
Re: Component Markup Language - From: "Frank Boumphrey" <bckman@ix.netcom.com>
Re: Component Markup Language - From: "Frank Boumphrey" <bckman@ix.netcom.com>
Re: SAX, Java, and Namespaces (was Re: Restricted Namespacesfor XML) - From: Tyler Baker <tyler@infinet.com>
Re: SAX, Java, and Namespaces (was Re: Restricted Namespaces for XML) - From: Tyler Baker <tyler@infinet.com>
Re: SAX, Java, and Namespaces (was Re: Restricted Namespaces for XML) - From: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
Re: SAX, Java, and Namespaces (was Re: Restricted Namespaces for XML) - From: David Megginson <david@megginson.com>
Re: CORBA's not boring yet. / XML in an OS? - From: Dave Winer <dave@userland.com>
Re: Fw: Namespaces does *not* formally introduce "global attributes" - From: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
Re: SAX, Java, and Namespaces (was Re: Restricted Namespaces for XML) - From: Tyler Baker <tyler@infinet.com>
Re: A weaker XSL? - From: Pavel Velikhov <pvelikho@cs.ucsd.edu>
Re: CORBA's not boring yet. / XML in an OS? - From: spreitze@parc.xerox.com
Re: A weaker XSL? - From: David Megginson <david@megginson.com>
Fw: Namespaces does *not* formally introduce "global attributes" - From: David Megginson <david@megginson.com>
SAX, Java, and Namespaces (was Re: Restricted Namespaces for XML) - From: David Megginson <david@megginson.com>
Re: A weaker XSL? - From: Paul Prescod <paul@prescod.net>
Re: A weaker XSL? - From: Paul Prescod <paul@prescod.net>
Re: A weaker XSL? - From: Clark Evans <clark.evans@manhattanproject.com>
Re: A weaker XSL? - From: peter@weblogic.com (Peter Seibel)
Re: Namespaces does *not* formally introduce "global attributes"