[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: "Ingargiola, Tito" <ti64877@imcnam.sbi.com>
- To: xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
- Date: Mon, 8 Feb 1999 11:22:37 -0500
Hi,
XML-RPC sounds nice to me: simple, light-weight and immediately applicable
to a good set of problems. I looked over some of the w3's pages on HTTP-NG,
however, and it looks like there's a good deal of overlapping functionality
between these two proposed standards. Why is this, and what's the intended
relation between the two (if any?) Are you investigating HTTP-NG support in
Frontier? Thanks for any insights. Regards,
Tito.
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@ic.ac.uk)
- Prev by Date:
RE: What Clean Specs Achieve, WAS: Colonialism, SAX, Java, and Namespaces
- Next by Date:
Re: What Clean Specs Achieve, WAS: Colonialism, SAX, Java, and Namespaces
- Previous by thread:
an initial idea for an XML überdocument shell (was Re: CORBA's not boring yet. / XML in an OS?)
- Next by thread:
RE: What Clean Specs Achieve, WAS: Colonialism, SAX, Java, and Namespaces
- Index(es):
|