|
|
xml-dev
|
|
Last updated: Sun Mar 16 17:11:23 2003
961 messages (listed by date and indexed by thread) |
Date Index
- XML and special Characters : unicode v3.0 ?,
Baden Hughes
- W3C-transformation language petition,
Paul Prescod
- XLINK role attribute for simple links?,
MikeDacon
- W3C spec.dtd,
Stefan Mintert
- Another Step Toward XML Content,
Ralph Ferris
- Yet another niggling XML syntax question,
roddey
- Re: Are notations dead, or just pining for the fjords? (was Re: SAX and delayed entity loading),
John Cowan
- Comments on WD-html-in-xml-19990224,
John Cowan
- HyBrick Download Problem Fixed,
Ralph Ferris
- Re: events vs callbacks,
Bill la Forge
- Re: Content-Document-Type: was (Re: MIME types vs. DOCTYPE),
MURATA Makoto
- recursing root element,
Frank Boumphrey
- XML with CSS in IE5,
Chung, Byung Hee
- ANNOUNCE: "HyBrick" Browser, V0.82,
Ralph Ferris
- Architecture docs for SAX,
Merriam, Rudyard
- Layered Model for XML,
Simon St.Laurent
- Proposal to standardise a Java API,
John Wilson
- ANNOUNCE: RDF DTD available,
Rick Jelliffe
- MIME and X(HT)ML (Re: MIME types vs. DOCTYPE),
Rick Jelliffe
- RE: Streaming XML (Was RE: XML Information Set Requirements, W3C Note 18-February-1999),
keshlam
- RE UML vs groves (Was Streaming XML),
Terry Allen
- Re: having to deal with mal-formed XML,
Jonathan Eisenzopf
- Re: MIME types vs. DOCTYPE (was RE: ANNOUNCE: New XHTML WD),
Tim Bray
- Multiple namespaces for HTML... why?,
Tim Bray
- Question about New XHTML WD,
Jeff Greif
- ANNOUNCE: New XHTML WD,
Frank Boumphrey
- Re: "Empty" Text Nodes,
John Cowan
- Streaming XML and SAX,
Simon St.Laurent
- re: Streams, protocols, documents and fragments,
Nathan Kurz
- RE: Streams, protocols, documents and fragments,
Borden, Jonathan
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Streams, protocols, documents and fragments,
Mark Birbeck
- RE: Streams, protocols, documents and fragments,
Borden, Jonathan
- RE: Streams, protocols, documents and fragments,
Tim.Shaw
- Re: Streams, protocols, documents and fragments,
Tom Harding
- Re: Streams, protocols, documents and fragments,
David Megginson
- Re: Streams, protocols, documents and fragments,
Tom Harding
- Re: Streams, protocols, documents and fragments,
Thomas Geer
- Re: Streams, protocols, documents and fragments,
David Megginson
- Re: Streams, protocols, documents and fragments,
Tom Harding
- Re: Streams, protocols, documents and fragments,
David Megginson
- Re: Streams, protocols, documents and fragments,
Tom Harding
- RE: Streams, protocols, documents and fragments,
Matthew Sergeant (EML)
- RE: Streams, protocols, documents and fragments,
Mark Birbeck
- RE: Streams, protocols, documents and fragments,
Mark Birbeck
- RE: Streams, protocols, documents and fragments,
Marc.McDonald
- RE: Streams, protocols, documents and fragments,
keshlam
- RE: Streams, protocols, documents and fragments,
Michael.Orr
- RE: Documents and Document Fragments,
Nathan Kurz
- RE: Streaming XML,
Tim Bray
- FYI: MS to ship IE5 on March 18th...,
Scot Wingo (nTronix)
- ANNOUNCE: XML Conformance Public Information Page,
G. Ken Holman
- RE: Streaming XML (Was RE: XML Information Set Requirements, W3C Note 18-February-1999),
Hutchison, Nigel
- RE: Streaming XML (Was RE: XML Information Set Requirements, W3C Note 18-February-1999),
Matthew Sergeant (EML)
- XML AND Semiconductor industry?,
Eric Huang
- XML implementation in MS-Word,
Chung, Byung Hee
- Re: More XML Identity Angst,
James Tauber
- localised declarations (Re: XML Information Set Requirements, W3C Note 18-February-1999),
James Tauber
- Re: events vs callbacks (was Re: SAX2 (was Re: DOM vs. SAX??? Nah. )),
Bill la Forge
- Announce: DTDGenerator frontend.,
Paul at Sunnyvale
- RE: Streaming XML (Was RE: XML Information Set Requirements, W3C Note 18-February-1999),
Mark Birbeck
- Re: Streaming XML (Was RE: XML Information Set Requirements, W3C Note 18-February-1999),
len bullard
- RE: Streaming XML (Was RE: XML Information Set Requirements, W3C Note 18-February-1999),
Borden, Jonathan
- Re: Streaming XML (Was RE: XML Information Set Requirements, W3C Note 18-February-1999),
Paul Prescod
- Re: Streaming XML (Was RE: XML Information Set Requirements, W3C Note 18-February-1999),
Steven R. Newcomb
- Re: Streaming XML (Was RE: XML Information Set Requirements, W3C Note 18-February-1999),
Lauren Wood
- Re: Streaming XML (Was RE: XML Information Set Requirements, W3C Note 18-February-1999),
len bullard
- RE: Streaming XML (Was RE: XML Information Set Requirements, W3C Note 18-February-1999),
Borden, Jonathan
- Re: Streaming XML (Was RE: XML Information Set Requirements, W3C Note 18-February-1999),
Steven R. Newcomb
- RE: Streaming XML (Was RE: XML Information Set Requirements, W3C Note 18-February-1999),
Borden, Jonathan
- Re: Streaming XML (Was RE: XML Information Set Requirements, W3C Note 18-February-1999),
Steven R. Newcomb
- RE: Streaming XML (Was RE: XML Information Set Requirements, W3C Note 18-February-1999),
Jonathan Borden
- Re: Streaming XML (Was RE: XML Information Set Requirements, W3C Note 18-February-1999),
len bullard
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Streaming XML (Was RE: XML Information Set Requirements, W3C Note 18-February-1999),
Mark Birbeck
- RE: Streaming XML (Was RE: XML Information Set Requirements, W3C Note 18-February-1999),
Eisele, Fred
- Well-formed vs. valid,
Jeffrey E. Sussna
- RE: Validation Conditions (was Streaming XML (was ...)),
Michael.Kay
- Re: layering specs,
Rick Jelliffe
- Re: Streaming XML (Was RE: XML Information Set Requirements, W3C Note 18-February-1999),
Richard Tobin
- Submitting comments on the XML Infoset Requirements,
David Megginson
- Stateful http xml middleware w/ servlets?,
Robb Shecter
- RE: Streams, protocols, documents and fragments was: RE: Documents and Document Fragments (Was RE: XML Information Set Requirements, W3C Note 18-February-1999),
Mark Birbeck
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Streams, protocols, documents and fragments was: RE: Documents and Document Fragments (Was RE: XML Information Set Requirements, W3C Note 18-February-1999),
James Tauber
- Re: Streams, protocols, documents and fragments was: RE: Documents and Document Fragments (Was RE: XML Information Set Requirements, W3C Note 18-February-1999),
James Tauber
- RE: Streams, protocols, documents and fragments was: RE: Documents and Document Fragments (Was RE: XML Information Set Requirements, W3C Note 18-February-1999),
Mark Birbeck
- test,
Sunny Sun
- Latin (was Re: Announcement: XML Infoset Requirements Published),
James Tauber
- XTech '99 starts in two weeks,
Jon Bosak
- Announcement: XML to DDML Converter available,
Rick Jelliffe
- New MDSAX and Coins release,
Bill la Forge
- Streaming XML (Was RE: XML Information Set Requirements, W3C Note 18-February-1999),
Mark Birbeck
- Documents and Document Fragments (Was RE: XML Information Set Requirements, W3C Note 18-February-1999),
Mark Birbeck
- RE: Documents and Document Fragments (Was RE: XML Information Set Req uirements, W3C Note 18-February-1999),
Didier PH Martin
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Documents and Document Fragments (Was RE: XML Information Set Requirements, W3C Note 18-February-1999),
James Tauber
- RE: Documents and Document Fragments (Was RE: XML Information Set Requirements, W3C Note 18-February-1999),
Mark Birbeck
- Re: Documents and Document Fragments (Was RE: XML Information Set Requirements, W3C Note 18-February-1999),
James Tauber
- RE: Documents and Document Fragments (Was RE: XML Information Set Requirements, W3C Note 18-February-1999),
Mark Birbeck
- Blockland (was Re: XML Information Set Requirements, W3C Note 18-February-1999),
Rick Jelliffe
- XML Product Manager opening at CommerceOne,
matt
- Confusion about conditional sections,
roddey
- ANNOUNCE: IBTWSH draft 5,
John Cowan
- xsl tutorials,
Harold Goldstein
- FW: XML Mail,
Borden, Jonathan
- XML Information Set Requirements, W3C Note 18-February-1999,
Clark Evans
- Re: XML Information Set Requirements, W3C Note 18-February-1999,
Marcus Carr
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: XML Information Set Requirements, W3C Note 18-February-1999,
Michael.Orr
- Re: XML Information Set Requirements, W3C Note 18-February-1999,
Nathan Kurz
- Re: XML Information Set Requirements, W3C Note 18-February-1999,
John Cowan
- RE: XML Information Set Requirements, W3C Note 18-February-1999,
Jeffrey E. Sussna
- Re: XML Information Set Requirements, W3C Note 18-February-1999,
Paul Prescod
- RE: XML Information Set Requirements, W3C Note 18-February-1999,
Jeffrey E. Sussna
- From XML to Latin Was: XML Information Set Requirements, W3C Note 18-February-1999,
Rob Schoening
- RE: XML Information Set Requirements, W3C Note 18-February-1999,
Walter Underwood
- RE: XML Information Set Requirements, W3C Note 18-February-1999,
Jeffrey E. Sussna
- Streaming XML? [was Re: XML Information Set Requirements..],
Tim.Shaw
- SAX and Standards Bodies (was Streaming XML?),
David Megginson
- Re: SAX and Standards Bodies (was Streaming XML?),
Simon St.Laurent
- Re: SAX and Standards Bodies (was Streaming XML?),
Rob Schoening
- RE: Streaming XML? [was Re: XML Information Set Requirements..],
Paul Butkiewicz
- Fw: XML Information Set Requirements, W3C Note 18-February-1999,
Oren Ben-Kiki
- RE: XML Information Set Requirements, W3C Note 18-February-1999,
Michael.Orr
- RE: XML Information Set Requirements, W3C Note 18-February-1999,
Marc.McDonald
- Re: XML Information Set Requirements, W3C Note 18-February-1999,
James Tauber
- Re: XML Information Set Requirements, W3C Note 18-February-1999,
Rick Jelliffe
- Re: XML Information Set Requirements, W3C Note 18-February-1999,
James Tauber
- Re: XML Information Set Requirements, W3C Note 18-February-1999,
Rick Jelliffe
- Re: XML Information Set Requirements, W3C Note 18-February-1999,
Tim Bray
- Re: XML Information Set Requirements, W3C Note 18-February-1999,
Bill la Forge
- Re: XML Information Set Requirements, W3C Note 18-February-1999,
Don Park
- Re: XML Information Set Requirements, W3C Note 18-February-1999,
James Tauber
- Re: XML Information Set Requirements, W3C Note 18-February-1999,
Don Park
- A question for developers,
Tim Bray
- Announcement: XML Infoset Requirements Published,
David Megginson
- Office 2000 and XML,
Paul Prescod
- XML DTD vs. XML-Data,
Tiago Moitinho de Almeida
- RE: CV/Resume,
Matthew Sergeant (EML)
- Immediate opening for XSL Pro!,
Rick Ross
- URIs as IDs in ModSAX (was Re: ModSAX (SAX 1.1) Proposal) (fwd),
Dan Brickley
- Re: ModSAX (SAX 1.1) Proposal (fwd),
Dan Brickley
- Exceptions or not (Was: RE: ModSAX (SAX 1.1) Proposal),
Jarle Stabell
- RXP 1.0 released,
Richard Tobin
- from a new member,
Prashanth Lakshmi Narayanan
- XML conferences in the UK,
Kaustav Bhattacharya
- XML 1.0 Errata, one year later,
Tim Bray
- No subject given,
Joseph DeArce
- XML Schema Requirements out,
Simon St.Laurent
- attaching files,
Jayadeva Babu Gali
- servlet/xml/xsl,
Jayadeva Babu Gali
- ANNOUNCING SAXON 4.0,
Michael.Kay
- Re: X3D,
Tim Bray
- ModSAX (SAX 1.1) Proposal,
David Megginson
- X3D,
len bullard
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: ModSAX (SAX 1.1) Proposal,
Jarle Stabell
- Re: ModSAX (SAX 1.1) Proposal,
Don Park
- RE: ModSAX (SAX 1.1) Proposal,
Ingargiola, Tito
- RE: ModSAX (SAX 1.1) Proposal,
Ingargiola, Tito
- Re: ModSAX (SAX 1.1) Proposal,
Don Park
- Re: ModSAX (SAX 1.1) Proposal,
Bill la Forge
- Re: ModSAX (SAX 1.1) Proposal,
Don Park
- Re: ModSAX (SAX 1.1) Proposal,
Don Park
- Re: ModSAX (SAX 1.1) Proposal,
Don Park
- Re: Roll-Your-Own Parsers,
roddey
- Valid RDF and security,
Robb Shecter
- Re: xml-dev Digest V1 #242,
keshlam
- Announcement: DocZilla Preview and all-new Demo Kit,
Mirja Hukari
- Suggestions for clean-specs (was: Clean specs),
MikeDacon
- XML Data Structure ...,
Dinesh Vadhia
- SAX2 (was Re: DOM vs. SAX??? Nah. ),
Bill la Forge
- Advantages of XML and SGML,
Clark Evans
- Ms. Manners,
roddey
- InheritanceFilter improved,
John Cowan
- Re: trying to understand the roll of XML,
Jonathan Eisenzopf
- Fw: DOM vs. SAX??? Nah. (was RE: Storing Lots of FiddlyBits (was Re: What is XML for?),
Clark Evans
- Fw: DOM vs. SAX??? Nah. (was RE: Storing Lots of Fiddly Bits (was Re: What is XML for?),
Oren Ben-Kiki
- Quite Standards Questions,
Richard Anderson
- dynamically XML,
Jayadeva Babu Gali
- Possible enhancements to Namespaces to allow valiadation,
Marc.McDonald
- RE: what is "completely different" [Re: RDF, Namespaces, and Versioning?],
Andrew Layman
- The Peace Process: DOM and namespaces...,
Rick Ross
- re: The Peace Process: DOM and namespaces...,
David Megginson
- Re: The Peace Process: DOM and namespaces...,
James Clark
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: The Peace Process: DOM and namespaces...,
Tim Bray
- Re: The Peace Process: DOM and namespaces...,
Tim Bray
- Re: The Peace Process: DOM and namespaces...,
Don Park
- RE: The Peace Process: DOM and namespaces...,
Andrew Layman
- Re: The Peace Process: DOM and namespaces...,
Don Park
- Re: The Peace Process: DOM and namespaces...,
Bill la Forge
- Re: The Peace Process: DOM and namespaces...,
Tim Bray
- Re: The Peace Process: DOM and namespaces...,
Bill la Forge
- The Peace Process: DOM and namespaces...,
keshlam
- Re: The Peace Process: DOM and namespaces...,
Tim Bray
- Re: The Peace Process: DOM and namespaces...,
Tim Bray
- RE: The Peace Process: DOM and namespaces...,
Matthew Sergeant (EML)
- RE: The Peace Process: DOM and namespaces...,
Michael.Kay
- Re: The Peace Process: DOM and namespaces...,
Bill la Forge
- Re: The Peace Process: DOM and namespaces...,
Bill la Forge
- Re: The Peace Process: DOM and namespaces...,
Don Park
- Re: The Peace Process: DOM and namespaces...,
Bill la Forge
- RE: The Peace Process: DOM and namespaces...,
Chris Lovett
- RE: Word and XML (was: XML standards coherency and so forth),
Biron,Paul V
- Re: RDF, Namespaces, and Versioning?,
James Tauber
- Roll-Your-Own Parsers (was: Re: What Clean Specs Achieve),
hpyle
- ANN: IBM XML Parser for Java (XML4J) v2.0.0,
TAMURA Kent
- Bluestone XML Product Family,
Atkins, Jon
- Data Model Patterns (Was: Groves and Architectural Forms),
Clark Evans
- RE: "Namespaces in XML" idea?,
Ronald Bourret
- RE: What Clean Specs Achieve, WAS: Colonialism, SAX, Java, and Namespaces,
Mark Birbeck
- URL: 19 Short Questions about Namespaces (with Answers),
David Megginson
- Re: XDK,
Don Park
- XML Parser with DOM in C,
David E. Cleary
- RE: What Clean Specs Achieve, WAS: Colonialism, SAX, Java, and Namespaces,
Tim Bray
- XML-RPC & HTTP-NG (was A critique of XML-RPC),
Ingargiola, Tito
- an initial idea for an XML überdocument shell (was Re: CORBA's not boring yet. / XML in an OS?),
James Tauber
- Clear specs: suggestions,
John E. Simpson
- 19 Short Questions about Namespaces (with Answers),
David Megginson
- Announcement: 4DOM 0.7.0,
uche.ogbuji
- problem,
Jayadeva Babu Gali
- Little problem with namespace,
Buster Blues
- Re: "Clean Specs",
Tim Bray
- Re: "Clean Specs",
Simon St.Laurent
- Re: "Clean Specs",
W. Eliot Kimber
- Re: "Clean Specs",
Liam R. E. Quin
- Re: "Clean Specs",
uche.ogbuji
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: "Clean Specs",
Tim Bray
- Re: "Clean Specs",
Don Park
- Re: "Clean Specs",
Frank Boumphrey
- Re: "Clean Specs",
Tim Bray
- Re: "Clean Specs",
Don Park
- RE: "Clean Specs",
Tim Bray
- Re: "Clean Specs",
Tim Bray
- RE: "Clean Specs",
Ronald Bourret
- RE: "Clean Specs",
Ronald Bourret
- "Clean Specs",
JEROME.YUROW
- Re: "Clean Specs",
Rick Jelliffe
- Fw: "Clean Specs",
Oren Ben-Kiki
- Re: Fw: "Clean Specs",
Tim Bray
- Fw: Fw: "Clean Specs",
Oren Ben-Kiki
- Fw: "Clean Specs",
Oren Ben-Kiki
- RE: "Clean Specs",
Buss, Jason A
- Re: "Clean Specs",
Frank Boumphrey
- Re: Fw: "Clean Specs",
Don Park
- XSL and namespaces,
Paul Prescod
- document vs non-document entity (was Re: CORBA's not boring yet. / XML in an OS?),
James Tauber
- A critique of XML-RPC,
John Cowan
- MDSAX beta2 includes filters for namespace and architectural forms,
Bill la Forge
- Re: Extra Complexity?,
Samuel R. Blackburn
- ANN: xmlproc 0.60,
Lars Marius Garshol
- Re: What Clean Specs Achieve,
Tim Bray
- What Clean Specs Achieve, WAS: Colonialism, SAX, Java, and Namespaces,
Bill la Forge
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: What Clean Specs Achieve, WAS: Colonialism, SAX, Java, and Namespaces,
Mark Birbeck
- Re: What Clean Specs Achieve,
Simon St.Laurent
- Re: What Clean Specs Achieve, WAS: Colonialism, SAX, Java, and Na mespaces,
uche.ogbuji
- RE: What Clean Specs Achieve, WAS: Colonialism, SAX, Java, and Namespaces,
Peter Seibel
- RE: What Clean Specs Achieve, WAS: Colonialism, SAX, Java, and Namespaces,
Rob Schoening
- Re: What Clean Specs Achieve, WAS: Colonialism, SAX, Java, and Namespaces,
John Cowan
- Re: What Clean Specs Achieve, WAS: Colonialism, SAX, Java, and Namespaces,
Clark Evans
- XDK,
Clark Evans
- RE: XDK,
Jeffrey E. Sussna
- RE: What Clean Specs Achieve, WAS: Colonialism, SAX, Java, and Namespaces,
Mark Birbeck
- RE: What Clean Specs Achieve, WAS: Colonialism, SAX, Java, and Namespaces,
Daniel Austin
- RE: What Clean Specs Achieve, WAS: Colonialism, SAX, Java, and Namespaces,
Mark Birbeck
- Slowness of JDK 1.1.x String.intern() [was Re: SAX, Java, and Namespaces ],
Jeff Greif
- Namespaces for "average programmers",
Paul Prescod
- RE: Colonialism, SAX, Java, and Namespaces,
Ronald Bourret
- Re: Colonialism, SAX, Java, and Namespaces,
Simon St.Laurent
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Colonialism, SAX, Java, and Namespaces,
Mark Birbeck
- Re: Colonialism, SAX, Java, and Namespaces,
Frank Boumphrey
- Re: Colonialism, SAX, Java, and Namespaces,
Bill la Forge
- RE: Colonialism, SAX, Java, and Namespaces,
Ron Daniel
- XML Spy v1.4 released,
Falk, Alexander
- MSXML 1.0,
Charles Gamble
- When to use attributes vs. elements,
Peter Seibel
- Re: A New Hope (was Re: Storing Lots of Fiddly Bits (was Re: What is XML for?)),
Rick Jelliffe
- New XML Resources page (Re: Using XSL as a Validation Language),
Rick Jelliffe
- Re: SAX, Java, and Namespaces (was Re: Restricted Namespaces forXML),
hpyle
- Re: SAX, Java, and Namespaces (was Re: Restricted NamespacesforXML),
Paul Prescod
- RE: SAX, Java, and Namespaces (was Re: Restricted Namespaces forXML),
Borden, Jonathan
- Namespaces and interoperability (was Re: SAX, Java, and Namespaces),
James Robertson
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: SAX, Java, and Namespaces (was Re: Restricted Namespaces forXML),
Tim Bray
- HTML, XML, XML-RPC in one net app,
Dave Winer
- 'How to unsubscribe?' information is attached to every mail.,
Shekhar Kshirsagar
- Re: SAX, Java, and Namespaces (was Re: Restricted Namespaces for XML),
Tim Bray
- Re: SAX, Java, and Namespaces (was Re: Restricted Namespacesfor XML),
Tyler Baker
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: SAX, Java, and Namespaces (was Re: Restricted Namespaces for XML),
hpyle
- Re: SAX, Java, and Namespaces (was Re: Restricted Namespaces for XML),
Simon St.Laurent
- Re: SAX, Java, and Namespaces (was Re: Restricted Namespaces forXML),
Paul Prescod
- Colonialism, SAX, Java, and Namespaces,
Simon St.Laurent
- Re: Colonialism, SAX, Java, and Namespaces,
Paul Prescod
- Re: Colonialism, SAX, Java, and Namespaces,
Simon St.Laurent
- Re: Colonialism, SAX, Java, and Namespaces,
Dave Winer
- Re: Colonialism, SAX, Java, and Namespaces,
Paul Prescod
- Re: Colonialism, SAX, Java, and Namespaces,
Jerome McDonough
- RDF (was Re: Colonialism, SAX, Java, and Namespaces),
James Robertson
- Re: RDF (was Re: Colonialism, SAX, Java, and Namespaces),
Paul Prescod
- Re: RDF (was Re: Colonialism, SAX, Java, and Namespaces),
James Robertson
- Re: RDF (was Re: Colonialism, SAX, Java, and Namespaces),
Paul Prescod
- Re: Colonialism, SAX, Java, and Namespaces,
David Megginson
- Re: Colonialism, SAX, Java, and Namespaces,
Paul Prescod
- Re: Colonialism, SAX, Java, and Namespaces,
Tyler Baker
- Re: Colonialism, SAX, Java, and Namespaces,
Paul Prescod
- Re: Colonialism, SAX, Java, and Namespaces,
Simon St.Laurent
- Average developers (was Re: Colonialism, SAX, Java, and Namespaces),
James Robertson
- Re: SAX, Java, and Namespaces (was Re: Restricted Namespaces forXML),
David Megginson
- Architectural Forms and Namespaces (Was: Re: SAX, Java, and Namespaces ),
Clark Evans
- Re: Architectural Forms and Namespaces (Was: Re: SAX, Java, and Namespaces ),
W. Eliot Kimber
- Architectural Forms and Namespaces (Was: Re: SAX, Java, and Namespaces ),
David Megginson
- Namespace Applications,
Paul Prescod
- Re: Namespace Applications,
Gabe Beged-Dov
- Re: Namespace Applications,
james anderson
- MS patents style sheets,
Simon St.Laurent
- CORBA's not boring yet. / XML in an OS?,
Robb Shecter
- Re: CORBA's not boring yet. / XML in an OS?,
Tyler Baker
- Namespace Registry? And what about Architectures?,
Clark Evans
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: CORBA's not boring yet. / XML in an OS?,
Ingargiola, Tito
- RE: CORBA's not boring yet. / XML in an OS?,
Ed Howland
- RE: CORBA's not boring yet. / XML in an OS?,
Matthew Sergeant (EML)
- RE: CORBA's not boring yet. / XML in an OS?,
Matthew Sergeant (EML)
- Re: CORBA's not boring yet. / XML in an OS?,
James Tauber
- CORBA's not boring yet. / XML in an OS?,
Oren Ben-Kiki
- Re: CORBA's not boring yet. / XML in an OS?,
Rick Jelliffe
- RE: Namespaces does *not* formally introduce "global attributes",
Ronald Bourret
- COBOL XML parser?,
Simon St.Laurent
- Component Markup Language,
Robb Shecter
- Re: Component Markup Language,
Frank Boumphrey
- Re: Component Markup Language,
Pierre Morel
- RE: Component Markup Language,
Mark Birbeck
- RE: Component Markup Language,
Matthew Sergeant (EML)
- RE: Component Markup Language,
Benedetto, Christopher
- Re: Component Markup Language,
Bill la Forge
- RE: Component Markup Language,
Mark Birbeck
- RE: Component Markup Language,
Matthew Sergeant (EML)
- RE: Component Markup Language,
Tim Bray
- RE: Component Markup Language,
Benedetto, Christopher
- RE: Component Markup Language,
Mark Birbeck
- RE: Component Markup Language,
Mark Birbeck
- Re: Component Markup Language,
Frank Boumphrey
- Re: Component Markup Language,
Frank Boumphrey
- RE: Component Markup Language,
Matthew Sergeant (EML)
- Re: Component Markup Language,
Frank Boumphrey
- Re: Component Markup Language,
James Tauber
- Re: A weaker XSL?,
Don Park
- Re: What is a good database for very large collections?,
Marcelo Cantos
- Restricted Namespaces for XML,
Don Park
- Re: Restricted Namespaces for XML,
Tyler Baker
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Restricted Namespaces for XML,
Don Park
- RE: Restricted Namespaces for XML,
Ronald Bourret
- Re: Restricted Namespaces for XML,
Tyler Baker
- SAX, Java, and Namespaces (was Re: Restricted Namespaces for XML),
David Megginson
- Re: SAX, Java, and Namespaces (was Re: Restricted Namespaces for XML),
Tyler Baker
- Re: SAX, Java, and Namespaces (was Re: Restricted Namespaces for XML),
David Megginson
- Re: SAX, Java, and Namespaces (was Re: Restricted Namespaces for XML),
Tyler Baker
- Re: Restricted Namespaces for XML,
Don Park
- Re: Restricted Namespaces for XML,
Tim Bray
- XML parsing techniques,
Peter Seibel
- 'Strong' status for XML,
Simon St.Laurent
- Can attribute value be of type ELEMENT ?,
Shekhar Kshirsagar
- Control Characters,
Eric Hellman
- What is the purpose of ANY keyword ?,
Shekhar Kshirsagar
- RE: Forking the DOM (was Re: Storing Lots of Fiddly Bits),
Matthew Sergeant (EML)
- XML and databases (NYC talk 2/8),
DuCharme, Robert
- Compound Documents as directories stored in zip files,
David Mohring
- Reminder: XML Research Dissemination Workshop 26 February in Edinburgh,
Henry S. Thompson
- unsubscribe,
Jayadeva Babu Gali
- Namespace clashes?,
Peter Finch
- RE: object databases,
Michael.Kay
- RE: 5.3 and Appendix A contradiction [Re: Another errata?],
Mark Birbeck
- ANN: ezDTD v1.5 -- DTD Editor/Generator/Formatter,
fasthand
- Stripping leading and trailing spaces???,
Dan Finkelstein
- Compositional Documents,
Chris Berry
- how to browse xml files with xsl style sheet LOCALLY ?,
Mathieu Mangeot Lerebours
- Is this invalid?,
Richard Tobin
- Namespaces without a domain name,
Matthew Sergeant (EML)
- Namespaces,
James Clark
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Namespaces,
Andrew Layman
- Re: Namespaces,
Don Park
- Fw: Namespaces,
Oren Ben-Kiki
- Fw: Fw: Namespaces,
Oren Ben-Kiki
- RE: Fw: Namespaces,
Mark Birbeck
- RE: Fw: Namespaces,
Mark Birbeck
- RE: Fw: Namespaces,
Mark Birbeck
- Fw: Namespaces,
Oren Ben-Kiki
- RE: Namespaces,
Ronald Bourret
- Fw: Namespaces,
Oren Ben-Kiki
- Re: Fw: Namespaces,
Tim Bray
- FW: Namespaces,
Serrat Jaime - jasr
- No Subject,
Chris Berry
- <Possible follow-ups>
- No Subject,
Benedetto, Christopher
- Since we're talking about databases...,
Tim Bray
- Re: Frontier as a scalable XML repository (was Re: Is XML dead already or what?),
Deke Smith
- RE: Real world DTD,
DuCharme, Robert
- NamespaceFilter and ParserFilter updates,
John Cowan
- SNMP,
Merriam, Rudyard
- What is a good database for very large collections? (was Re: XSL/ECMAscript (was RE: Frontier as a scalable XML repository (was Re: Is XML dead already or what?)),
Rick Jelliffe
- RE: Storing Lots of Fiddly Bits (was Re: What is XML for?),
Mark Birbeck
- Re: Storing Lots of Fiddly Bits (was Re: What is XML for?),
Paul Prescod
- RE: Storing Lots of Fiddly Bits (was Re: What is XML for?),
Borden, Jonathan
- Re: Storing Lots of Fiddly Bits (was Re: What is XML for?),
Paul Prescod
- Forking the DOM (was Re: Storing Lots of Fiddly Bits),
Simon St.Laurent
- RE: Storing Lots of Fiddly Bits (was Re: What is XML for?),
Borden, Jonathan
- Re: Storing Lots of Fiddly Bits (was Re: What is XML for?),
Clark Evans
- RE: Storing Lots of Fiddly Bits (was Re: What is XML for?),
Borden, Jonathan
- Re: Storing Lots of Fiddly Bits (was Re: What is XML for?),
Clark Evans
- RE: Storing Lots of Fiddly Bits (was Re: What is XML for?),
Borden, Jonathan
- Re: Storing Lots of Fiddly Bits (was Re: What is XML for?),
Clark Evans
- Re: Storing Lots of Fiddly Bits (was Re: What is XML for?),
Tyler Baker
- A weaker XSL? (Was: Storing Lots of Fiddly Bits ),
Clark Evans
- Re: A weaker XSL?,
Nathan Kurz
- Re: A weaker XSL?,
Tyler Baker
- Re: A weaker XSL?,
Clark Evans
- Re: Storing Lots of Fiddly Bits (was Re: What is XML for?),
Paul Prescod
- Re: Storing Lots of Fiddly Bits (was Re: What is XML for?),
matt
- A New Hope (was Re: Storing Lots of Fiddly Bits (was Re: What is XML for?)),
spreitze
- RE: Storing Lots of Fiddly Bits (was Re: What is XML for?),
Borden, Jonathan
- HDBMS vs RDBMS (Was: Re: Storing Lots of Fiddly Bits (was Re: What is XML for?)),
Clark Evans
- Re: Storing Lots of Fiddly Bits (was Re: What is XML for?),
Paul Prescod
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Storing Lots of Fiddly Bits (was Re: What is XML for?),
Mark Birbeck
- Re: Storing Lots of Fiddly Bits (was Re: What is XML for?),
Mark D. Anderson
- Re: Storing Lots of Fiddly Bits (was Re: What is XML for?),
Marcelo Cantos
- Re: Storing Lots of Fiddly Bits (was Re: What is XML for?),
uche.ogbuji
- RE: Storing Lots of Fiddly Bits (was Re: What is XML for?),
Borden, Jonathan
- RE: Storing Lots of Fiddly Bits (was Re: What is XML for?),
W. Eliot Kimber
- Re: Storing Lots of Fiddly Bits (was Re: What is XML for?),
uche.ogbuji
- Re: Storing Lots of Fiddly Bits (was Re: What is XML for?),
Steven R. Newcomb
- RE: Storing Lots of Fiddly Bits (was Re: What is XML for?),
Borden, Jonathan
- Re: Storing Lots of Fiddly Bits (was Re: What is XML for?),
Paul Prescod
- RE: Storing Lots of Fiddly Bits (was Re: What is XML for?),
Borden, Jonathan
- Re: Storing Lots of Fiddly Bits (was Re: What is XML for?),
Paul Prescod
- Re: Storing Lots of Fiddly Bits (was Re: What is XML for?),
uche.ogbuji
- RE: Storing Lots of Fiddly Bits (was Re: What is XML for?),
Borden, Jonathan
- Re: Storing Lots of Fiddly Bits (was Re: What is XML for?),
uche.ogbuji
- Re: Storing Lots of Fiddly Bits (was Re: What is XML for?),
Paul Prescod
- Re: Storing Lots of Fiddly Bits (was Re: What is XML for?),
Clark Evans
- DOM API,
Paul Prescod
- RDF, Namespaces, and Versioning?,
Clark Evans
- re: RDF, Namespaces, and Versioning?,
David Megginson
- Re: RDF, Namespaces, and Versioning?,
Clark Evans
- Re: RDF, Namespaces, and Versioning?,
David Megginson
- what is "completely different" [Re: RDF, Namespaces, and Versioning?],
james anderson
- what is "completely different" [Re: RDF, Namespaces, and Versioning?],
David Megginson
- Re: Storing Lots of Fiddly Bits (was Re: What is XML for?),
Marcelo Cantos
- Re: Storing Lots of Fiddly Bits (was Re: What is XML for?),
Paul Prescod
- Re: Storing Lots of Fiddly Bits (was Re: What is XML for?),
Bill la Forge
- RE: Storing Lots of Fiddly Bits (was Re: What is XML for?),
keshlam
- Re: SAX: Next Round (Lexical Event Handler),
John Cowan
- Namespace prefixes in attribute declarations,
Ronald Bourret
- RE: Another errata?,
Ronald Bourret
- Re: Another errata?,
james anderson
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Another errata?,
Tim Bray
- RE: Another errata?,
Andrew Layman
- RE: Another errata?,
Mark Birbeck
- Re: Another errata?,
Don Park
- RE: Another errata?,
Mark Birbeck
- RE: Another errata?,
Ogievetsky, Nikita
- RE: Another errata?,
Mark Birbeck
- RE: Another errata?,
Ronald Bourret
- RE: Another errata?,
Mark Birbeck
- RE: Another errata?,
Mark Birbeck
- Re: Another errata?,
Tim Bray
- RE: Compound Documents - necessary for success?,
Ronald Bourret
- XSL Draft?,
parul agarwal
- Interesting Monday.,
Matthew Sergeant (EML)
- RE: XML query engines,
Jarle Stabell
|
|
|
|
|
|
