Lists Home |
Date Index |
- From: Paul Prescod <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- To: email@example.com
- Date: Fri, 05 Feb 1999 08:00:20 -0600
> Although James Clarks' page does explain the state of affairs very clearly,
> it's still talking to the wrong people.
I don't think that "average developers" need to worry about namespaces. It
is quite simple to build powerful, useful applications without them. I
mean if you are implementing RDF or XSL then you need them, but short of
that, I wouldn't bother.
> Namespaces seem to be an essential solution to two problems
> encountered when designing XML stuctures:
> - how can I distinguish my tags from everyone else's, to avoid confusion
> (eg: "<my:pastry/>");
Actually, this problem is very RARELY encountered. If you are building a
typical one-organization application then what are you doing with "other
people's tags" in your documents? I mean, if you are writing typical
software, it will choke and die when it comes upon tags it does not know
> - how can I use a common repository of meaningful tags at the same time
> (eg: "<frozen:pastry><my:sauce
You don't need namespaces for that. Just create a "liters_quantity"
element type and include it in your various DTDs with parameter entities.
Paul Prescod - ISOGEN Consulting Engineer speaking for only himself
"Remember, Ginger Rogers did everything that Fred Astaire did,
but she did it backwards and in high heels."
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:email@example.com the following message;
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org the following message;
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:email@example.com)