[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: "Frank Boumphrey" <bckman@ix.netcom.com>
- To: "Jonathan Borden" <jborden@mediaone.net>, "xml mailing list" <xml-dev@ic.ac.uk>
- Date: Wed, 24 Feb 1999 14:34:01 -0500
one point: there is no reason to define text/xhtml as opposed to
>using text/xml and inserting a DOCTYPE or perhaps a default xmlns
>definition. If a user-agent needs to know the DOCTYPE ... look at it!
The problem arises with slim clients such as a cell phone. To look at the
DOCTYPE the document must be downloaded, and cracked open. Rather a waste of
both Band width and resources. For example a cell phone may elect not to
accept a SGML based HTML document, and may not know how to present an XML
document. Style sheets may not be appropriate for some clients
DITTO if one wants to use a namespace.
What we need is some kind of content negotiation between the client and the
server, and the HTTP header is obviously the way to do this.
The problem with using a specific text/xhtml mime is that it sets a
dangerous precedent, and could lead to a potential explosion of mime types.
However some kind of negotiation must be performed.
Without giving any thing away I think I can say that there has been a
spirited debate on the subject, and as is pointed out in the WD, comment and
suggestions on this subject is particularly welcome.
Regards,
Frank
Frank Boumphrey
XML and style sheet info at Http://www.hypermedic.com/style/index.htm
Author: - Professional Style Sheets for HTML and XML http://www.wrox.com
CoAuthor: XML applications from Wrox Press, www.wrox.com
Author: Using XML on the Web (March)
----- Original Message -----
From: Jonathan Borden <jborden@mediaone.net>
To: Frank Boumphrey <bckman@ix.netcom.com>; xml mailing list
<xml-dev@ic.ac.uk>
Sent: Wednesday, February 24, 1999 1:24 PM
Subject: RE: ANNOUNCE: New XHTML WD
>excellent. one point: there is no reason to define text/xhtml as opposed to
>using text/xml and inserting a DOCTYPE or perhaps a default xmlns
>definition. If a user-agent needs to know the DOCTYPE ... look at it!
>
>Jonathan Borden
>http://jabr.ne.mediaone.net
>
>>
>>
>> The new working draft for XHTML is available at
>>
>> http://www.w3.org/TR/1999/WD-html-in-xml-19990224/
>>
>> Frank
>> Frank Boumphrey
>>
>
>
>xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
>Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on
CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
>To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
>(un)subscribe xml-dev
>To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following
message;
>subscribe xml-dev-digest
>List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@ic.ac.uk)
>
>
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@ic.ac.uk)
|