Lists Home |
Date Index |
- From: David Megginson <email@example.com>
- To: Clark Evans <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Date: Wed, 10 Feb 1999 14:10:24 -0500 (EST)
Clark Evans writes:
> > Of course, I know that I could do all of this with
> > architectural forms as well.
> You can do _all_ of it with both? I had pictured
> a combination punch to solve the problem. I see
> namespaces and architectural forms as yet another
> complementary system within XML.
Architectural forms can do everything that namespaces do, but not in
such a web-friendly way. Namespaces can handle only a small subset of
what architectural forms can do.
> I don't see one or the other used. I see them
> being used in combination. What am I missing?
The AF equivalent of a qualified name is the URL or public ID of the
meta-DTD file combined with the architectural form. It hasn't really
taken off, though, and I agree that self-identifying AFs
(i.e. qualified names) show some promise.
All the best,
David Megginson email@example.com
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:email@example.com the following message;
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org the following message;
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:email@example.com)