[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: James Robertson <jamesr@steptwo.com.au>
- To: xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
- Date: Sun, 07 Feb 1999 10:48:02 +1000
At 01:12 6/02/1999 , Simon St.Laurent wrote:
| I would really appreciate if someday the people building W3C specs would
| acknowledge that 'average developers' actually do have to worry about
| namespaces, notations, parameter entities, include/ignore sections, and
| trying to read the specs themselves. If they would then take that knowledge
| and apply it to the specification-writing process, from start to finish, we
| might be able to move forward with a lot less back-and-forth about what
| these things are really supposed to mean.
Simon,
I would ask: _why_ does the average developer need all
this complexity?
I've been tacking jobs big and small, in the real world, for
some time now.
And I haven't bothered with any of it.
Simple DTDs can take you a hell of a long way ...
(Namespaces are simply meaningless in 99% of real-world
apps, for without DTDs, you have nothing.)
Just my $0.02 of course ... ;-)
J
-------------------------
James Robertson
Step Two Designs Pty Ltd
SGML, XML & HTML Consultancy
http://www.steptwo.com.au/
jamesr@steptwo.com.au
"Beyond the Idea"
ACN 081 019 623
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@ic.ac.uk)
- Prev by Date:
Namespaces and interoperability (was Re: SAX, Java, and Namespaces)
- Next by Date:
RDF (was Re: Colonialism, SAX, Java, and Namespaces)
- Previous by thread:
Re: Colonialism, SAX, Java, and Namespaces
- Next by thread:
Re: SAX, Java, and Namespaces (was Re: Restricted Namespaces forXML)
- Index(es):
|