[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: Jarle Stabell <jarle.stabell@dokpro.uio.no>
- To: "'xml-dev@ic.ac.uk'" <xml-dev@ic.ac.uk>
- Date: Tue, 16 Feb 1999 00:26:23 +0100
David Megginson wrote:
> public interface ModParser extends Parser
> {
> public abstract void setFeature (String featureID, boolean state)
> throws SAXNotSupportedException;
>
> public abstract void setHandler (String handlerID, ModHandler
handler)
> throws SAXNotSupportedException;
> }
Is it obvious that one should throw exceptions on not supported?
I believe it in many cases would be more comfortable if it returned a
boolean supported or not instead of throwing an exception, as many clients
probably want/need to check whether a particular feature is supported or
not (and trade off behaviour accordingly)
Cheers,
Jarle
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@ic.ac.uk)
|
